You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Cladhexea. Level 4 warning as a continuation of those recieved on your IP talk page. Please familiarize yourself with how to use Help:Talk pages, and how to write an article (see Wikipedia:Writing better articles), before posting this again. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Chaotic Enby! Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 22:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chaotic Enby, Wikipedia is made by people who work together. Chaotic Enby can we work together please? Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 22:58, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 22:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UtherSRG you blocked me? I tried to help Wikipedia by making talk:Cladhexea not destruction. Mines(-) talk:Cladhexea the my edits were like giving an image you know miner stuff. I knew the order Cladhexea wasn’t described yet meaning no info, so I made talk:Cladhexea. Hopefully you understand why I did this just for talk:Cladhexea. Good day. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. "Not described" doesn't mean that information describing how it looked like/behaved like was missing in the article, it means that the species in the order have not been formally described yet, as the paper establishing most of Placozoa's current taxonomy did not have any type specimens to describe these species from. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my taxonomy part I only go down to order were the text is bold not linked to anything. Yes info can be misleading like when Cladhexea is described maybe some thing I said are wrong maybe not. I don’t know what Cladhexea is really like so I did any biologist would do, make a good guess. I don’t know maybe cladhexea is extinct maybe maybe not. This is like talking about an extinct animal maybe Protoconodonta an extinct group of arrow worms. We won’t have a lot of data because there extinct. I hope you understand now what is happening. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And my images are like all placozoa. I can understand why you say that but the images are generall placozoa info, and Cladhexea is a placozoa. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the argument but all and all I can say that you are right about the images and behavior of Cladhexea but is just a guess based on other placozoa. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not "maybe it is extinct maybe not". You can read the article here to see how it is define, it corresponds to former placozoan Clade VI. To be fair, there's really not that much to say about it, but that doesn't mean you can add guesses to the article (see Wikipedia:Original research). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are for discussion about the article, not for making drafts for improving it. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 23:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question DO YOU THINK I CAN MODIFY A ARTICLE TO ITS LIMITS? THINK ABOUT THAT. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't make sense. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well the article at least makes sense and if you don’t like my stuff then search the species of placozoa, that will give you some fun(being sarcastic)!. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 00:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, you are correct but still it is pretty good and how did you even find what I made? I mean it has more info than the article so you need to give me some credit and I used reliable sources so and I know there undescribed but they are most likely real. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I have 2 people arguing with me about making a scientific thing on talk:cladhexea if you 2 don’t like that then Search the placozoa species on Wikipedia and go to the talk. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 00:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sooooooo I will need to wait for 13 days and I will recap on “…” every day so, and I wish this argument ends so bye? Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to do so, you will risk being indefinitely blocked and having your talk page access removed. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:06, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't use reliable sources. https://wiki.scholarship.edu.vn/Cladhexea and https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Cladhexea are both Wikipedia:Mirrors of the existing page, they shouldn't be used as sources (see also WP:CIRCULAR). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atlas, this madness needs to stop. This talk page is not for drafts. I tried to read over this page, and I'm wondering how far we are removed from an indefinite block for disruption--you may want to look at WP:CIR. If you continue with that kind of talk, I will not have any other option but to remove talk page access. Drmies (talk) 01:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Drmies after 13 days I’ll edit the article. Happy?(happĩ?) Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 01:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The point of being blocked is to reflect on how it is you have disrupted the community, and figure out how to not do so in the future. If you are going to simply stew for two weeks and then resume editing in a disruptive manner, you will be blocked indefinitely. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:26, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait okay ill forget about it. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 01:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you decided to WP:LOUTSOCK (see this edit), I'm extending your block to a month from now. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 11:43, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlas Þə Biologist! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, and once your short block expires, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Also, you can use your user sandbox for test editing or making drafts of new or improved articles.

Finally, please note the recent edits I made to your user pages on other projects, to make images into "thumbnail" size.

Happy editing! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In biology an obelisk is a rod shaped wild RNA that infects cells like viroids, viruses, etc…

obelisk are viroid’s more complex cousins sorta. They were found in humans partially in the mouth infecting Streptococcus sanguinis. The obelisk probably has an important place in evolutionary tree of life; in the image you see that I put on Wikimedia commons we see the obelisk. They are the last wRNA (wild RNA) we see in till viruses. We think there could be around 43,000 species of obelisk. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 05:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm not sure how accurate this tree of life is, I don't know any phylogenies that nest cellular life inside viruses. Viruses don't even necessarily share common descent (see Realm (virology)), with several known instances of virus coming into existence from stray plasmids. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 05:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By plasmids do you mean wild RNA? Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 05:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mucoromyceta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s funny because I was just about to put resources… Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 22:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Atlas Þə Biologist, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 02:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mucoromyceta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NotAGenious (talk) 04:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Atlasopedia! Ask a question, ask for a sub article and I’ll make it on my talk! Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I think there should be 3 subsuperdomains in the biota.

1. Acytota (non-cellular life = viruses)
2. Cytota (cellular life)
3. Rnytota (RNA life)

The reason I included the “rnytota” is to have RNA life. If you think this is for familiar than this is a reference to the RNA world hypothesis, and it’s still very much a RNA world. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 02:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi others again! Atlas Þə Biologist (talk ✐ᝰ) 21:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on ✐ᝰ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 21:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was to go to my contributions. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk ✐ᝰ) 21:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you need a mainspace redirect to your contributions? I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 21:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it looks cool and for some reason Wikipedia can’t just do the normal thing so I needed to make redirect. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 21:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just used [[Special:Contribs/I dream of horses|(Hoofprints)]] [[User talk:I dream of horses|(Neigh at me)]] for my signature. No redirects necessary. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 21:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Atlas Þə Biologist (talk ✐ᝰ) 21:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I just made the article Pyrosomella verticillata. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Taxonomy/Furia (animal) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have some fun symbols for you! ⌾○⦿●•⊕◘∴∷⁍⁌⁃◈»☛❁✿❀⊗✧⊹♡◾￫⇾⊛✽✤❥⬤◙‣➼➥➛▹▷➤→⫸➣⋗⊵⊳≫➧➲✪★✩⍟▪▫▣◆◇⎔▢❏■⊡❙⊢∙↳⇢☞➠↱↬⤠⤞➮➭⇰⤇➺↠↦⤅➾➩➳❖➜ Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"What's the deal with the radio silence, Harry?" Captain Laura Castellanos asked, her voice crackling through the headset. Harry, the young communications officer aboard the submarine, The Nautilus, fiddled with the dials nervously.

"It's weird, Captain," Harry replied, his eyes glued to the flickering screens, "We're not picking up anything from the surface. It's like we've dropped off the face of the Earth down here." Laura nodded, her gaze drifting to the depth gauge. They were deep, much deeper than any of their previous dives. The mission to study the mysteries of the ocean floor had taken them to uncharted territories, and she could feel the excitement building among the crew.

"Look it’s a 120-meter-long Apolemia uvaria!" exclaimed Dr. Marcus, the lead biologist on the team. His voice reverberated through the narrow corridor of the submarine, filled with a mix of awe and excitement. The crew gathered around the small porthole, peering into the abyssal darkness outside. Suddenly, a burst of bioluminescence pierced the gloom, revealing the ethereal beauty of the giant siphonophore. Its glowing tendrils danced in the water like the fingers of a spectral pianist, each one a silent symphony of life in the deep sea.

The Apolemia uvaria was a creature of unparalleled grace and size, its body a series of gas-filled bladders that stretched out like a neon necklace. Laura felt a shiver of wonder run down her spine as she watched it glide effortlessly through the water, the pressure at this depth seemingly inconsequential to its delicate form. The biologists began to snap photos and take notes, their voices hushed and reverent as they recorded the rare encounter.

"It's in a spiral shape, Captain," Dr. Marcus murmured, his eyes gleaming with the excitement of discovery. Laura leaned closer to the porthole, studying the creature's form. The siphonophore's tendrils spun out from the central axis in a mesmerizing pattern, each coil designed to trap the unsuspecting prey that dared to venture too close. The light show it put on was a silent siren's call, luring in small fish and crustaceans that had no idea of the lethal embrace that awaited them.

The submarine's spotlight cast a beam through the water, illuminating a cloud of krill that had been drawn in by the siphonophore's bioluminescence. The tiny organisms darted and swirled, their bodies reflecting the blue-green glow in a frenetic ballet of survival. Laura's heart raced as she watched the siphonophore's tendrils stretch and coil around the swarm, drawing them into the deadly spiral. The water around the creature grew thick with the panic of a thousand tiny lives about to be extinguished.

"I think we should return to the surface," Laura announced, her voice firm and clear. The scientists looked up from their equipment, surprised by the interruption. Harry nodded in agreement, his fingers poised over the controls that would send them back to the safety of the surface. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[2][3][4][5]   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  22:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I might leave Wikipedia. I’m sorry I might I don’t know yet and it’s for 1 reason, the user Elmidae. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 04:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A topic is a thing you put in talks. Am I correct?topic topic topic topic topic topic topic _topic ^topic Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:19, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not ready for a standalone article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pyrosomatinae and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:42, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I like the photo Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 23:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Memer15151 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

iNaturalist is not reliable in this case, as its source of information is the Wikipedia article fr Pyrosomatidae, and you cannot cite Wikipedia on Wikipedia. You should also work on cleaning up the grammar and clarity issues, although fixing them is not required for acceptance. Just remove the iNaturalist source and find out where the Wikipedia article it used got its information for that statement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pyrosomatinae and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UserMemer (chat) Tribs 11:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iberian Ribbed Newt
In an aquarium
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Superphylum:	Deuterostomia
(unranked):	Bilateria
Phylum:	Chordata
Superclass:	Tetrapoda
Class:	Amphibia
Subclass:	Lissamphibia
Order:	Urodela
Family:	Salamandridae
Genus:	Pleurodeles
Species:	P. waltl
Binomial name
Pleurodeles waltl

Cute newt not a lizard.

Likes to chill out

They live in Iberia

• newt'

newt

Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 00:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jlwoodwa were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

None of this draft's cited sources mention Justapedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justapedia Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 03:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use images at full size. They can be slow to load, or in some cases, entirely break Wikipedia. If a user is interested in the image, they can click on it to make it bigger rather than having it immediately shoved in their face. As such, I've added the thumb parameter to all your userspace images (and frameless for your pfp). See WP:EIS for syntax, and suggestions. Thank you and best wishes. Zinnober9 (talk) 05:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Articles with Justapedia origins has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Entirely unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TSAR and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 05:22, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Living things and Pleomorphic. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG], requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Google search is not an acceptable reference.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TSAR and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:05, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlas Þə Biologist,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Jonathan Deamer, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Eukaryota/incertae sedis for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jonathan Deamer}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Jonathan Deamer (talk) 20:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I originally wanted for it to be Template:Eukaryota/incertae sedis. It should be move to template:Eukaryota/incertae sedis. It should be deleted. Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 20:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eukaryota/incertae sedis==

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Eukaryota/incertae sedis, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:55, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

Per previous decline reasons.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pyrosomatinae and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:14, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There’s nothing wrong with it. So what’s the problem now? Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 03:47, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]