Archives

User talk:Ashley Pomeroy/Pre-2011 (Pre-2011)

"Some people heard Johnny Rotten's cry of "get pissed... destroy!" and took this as a call to set up left-wing youth community theatre projects. I set out to get pissed and destroy":

I finally bought the album, and although I love it, there are so many melodic/musical similarities... like Margaritaville, or Wake Up...not to mention his own work in Tarkio! - Theornamentalist (talk) 04:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Larry Norman are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. I don't appreciate you pointing people to my personal page nor do I appreciate you telling me how to live my life. More importantly, it's not appropriate for a talk page on a subject who is not me. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not delete text. I merely correct misspelled words and grammar - like the professor writing on the walls of the restroom :)

EoGuy (talk) 23:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your edit to Megali Mantineia, which corrected "inhabiants" somewhere down the page, but completed failed to spot the obvious, and obviously incorrect "The old school, built i 1743-53" in the very last line, along with three other typos and misspellings. That was staggeringly incompetent, and gives me the impression that you're not even bothering to read the articles, or indeed read the start and end of the articles that you're correcting. The mistake above was particularly bad. Your kind of dabbling but sloppy work is likely to do more damage to Wikipedia than the deletions you have spent every month of your life for the last six years correcting, so I would love it if you stopped attacking editors who are focusing on different aspects of Wikipedia than you are. Chris the speller ^yack 15:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • • How do you add 'I love this twat' to a writeup?*** 93.97.228.234 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because images of those things would be irelevant? He co-created Pee-Wee Herman. That's perfectly relevant. Gran² 13:55, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

... has been edited, changing the terms of your offer and alleging you to be a self-described "jerk face". 76.244.149.253 (talk) 21:16, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I say

I hate rosé

but I'll drink it

anyway

Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 12:44, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ashley. Thank you for your posting the "off site canvassing" email you received from User:Bzuk with regard to "No Highway in the Sky". This editor is a long story as he is one who basically does not like to have his particular views on anything (particularly formatting and a variety of other issues some of which he has self admitted as being done to be "petty") ever challenged or questioned in any way. I am used to discovering his canvassing in other WP forums made without his advising me (although this is the first time I have been made aware of his also doing so "off site" as well), but not to worry I can take care of myself. (I don't know where he came up with the impression that I am a John Wayne fan, however, as I am not.) With that out of the way, you certainly have a really super photography blog which I found linked on your user page which, by the way, I think is wonderfully written. I have bookmarked it and will now follow regularly. I do both SLR digital photography -- mostly of railroads -- as well as digital image restoration of all kinds. (See my user page for links to my many other photography and history web sites.) Thanks for your support in the "off site canvassing" issue and making me aware that it happened. I have asked Bzuk to not do it again. Centpacrr (talk) 20:17, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ashley - I noticed you contributed in some way to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_control_photography so I thought you might be interested in the fact that I have created Mark Roberts Motion Control. Could you please look it over and make sure I've done it right. I'm hoping you might like to contribute to it too.

I had a look through your Wiki bio and 2 things struck me - your mention of Monty Python. I must be one of the world's biggest Python fans having met all of the living Pythons. I've been bonkers about it since 1973. I also saw that you mentioned the original Brighton Rock movie. Well my mum happened to be at its 1947 premiere as you can see in the leftmost pic, second row from the top here: http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.464385394013.260043.517774013&type=1&l=addc32f450 Setomorp (talk) 04:34, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:39, 25 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Muhself.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In May 2008, you asked a question at Talk:Penelope Tree#Drugs. I have just left a response for you. (Better late than never.) If you wish to respond, please do so over there. HairyWombat 20:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That bit where you explain how you're the first to alter Richard Attenborough's entry seems to link to a bit about the death of his grand-daughter Lucy. It's just a bit bad taste. It's the 'I put that in' bit. Also - were you the guy on e2 who got very, very excited about 'A Flock Of Seagulls', because I really respect that... AFOS is the real deal. They're not a *specific* flock, just a flock. Of seagulls, man... any flock, any place... all those rooms are empty. It's like when Gary muses 'and I can think for myself'. Yeah. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.228.234 (talk) 00:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , I stumbled upon your name and see your Wikipedia editor. I've not written any articles and have only added small details and a few photos to wiki commons. The reason why I write is to ask your help in writing an article on the surname Pomeroy as I see you share this name with me. I recently researched the lineage and for the last 3 months keep stumbling upon more Pomeroys every day. Until the research I'd never heard the name except my immediate family. I have submitted a page , but its in its approval stage. Any help or further research in building the page would be a great help.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenpomeroy (talk • contribs) 03:24, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I missed your message on this article's Talk page until now.

Yes, there are probably better ways to spend my declining years than tagging cites on a list line by line. However, the assessors insist on it, and the deletionists delight on pouncing upon articles they consider undercited. What's a guy to do?

Georgejdorner (talk) 21:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comment Talk:Policeman_submachine_gun. I prod that article. DrunkSquirrel (talk) 02:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, was wondering if you'd like to weigh in on whether we should move The Lords of Brooklyn to The Lord's of Brooklyn. Cheers! JesseRafe (talk) 03:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about your "Fly Me to the Moon" mass deletion. I've seen it done before by other editors on many great songs, but we still seem so determinedly unable to establish what is notable. You did delete some great versions though. Take a look at the history of "Summertime" is you fancy a laugh/cry. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 19:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, There is a discussion regarding edits you, me and another have made. perhaps you'd like to join in? Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 11:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited No Turn Unstoned, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dame (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 65535 (number) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• also the limit for many player variables in [[video game]]s, such as attack damage in ''[StarCraft]]'', [[experience point]]s in ''[[Dragon Warrior]]'', character stats for ''[[Mu Online]]'', and the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Ashely, I see you recently deleted a lot of text in the Trenitalia article about an advertising goof by Trenitalia some time ago, replacing the entire explanation with the terse phrase "non-white". Yeah, I wrote that explanation. Why? Because at the time, people were writing about the family saying they were "black" when they were clearly from the Indian subcontinent. Obviously, "black" doesn't mean the same thing in the UK as it does in North America, so I clarified that the original Italian (which I speak) didn't say "black".

Your reduction of the whole detailed discussion to "non-white" might be OK...if the phrase "non-white" meant the same everywhere...but it doesn't. Recently here in Richardson, Texas, there was a stink about a guy running for mayor who was half-Iranian and half-Palestinian, for an otherwise "all-white" city council. The implication (by a respected local magazine) was that the candidate for mayor was "non-white". The problem with this whole thing is that Arabs consider themselves "white" (ask the US Census Bureau) and Iranians are the original "white" since "Iranian" is the same word as "Aryan". Really. See RumorCheck.org

In any case, there is considerable confusion in the US over whether Asian Indians (as the family in the photo appeared to be) are considered "white". They were considered "white" by the US Census Bureau up until 1980, after which they were lumped in with "Asian"...but, of course, in the US, Asian in popular speech refers only to residents of the Far East (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, etc.). I believe that it is presumptive to assume that everyone reading this article would know what "white" and "non-white" meant.

Anyway, before I revert your edit, would you like to talk about it first? William J. 'Bill' McCalpin (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I stumbled across your user page and your photos in particular File:St Lawrence 0800.jpg. I was curious what/which "St Lawrence's" is referred to in the photo but couldn't figure it out. If there's an appropriate WP article describing it, may I suggest wikilinking to it in the summary for your photo? 94.7.168.62 (talk) 12:28, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, a bit more searching (and checking another of your photos) and I've figured it out. 94.7.168.62 (talk) 12:36, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Windows 95-XP Calculator.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick Chauvel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Grozny. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a vandal, just an inept editor. I didn't know how to fix the sub-heading, thanks for doing so. The misspellings come from posting in a hurry. The banner at the top of the page asked for citations to be added; I put in several recent published works - including my own book - and one primary source document. I think I have improved the article. Thanks again for your comments. -Chris O'Connor — Preceding unsigned comment added by CPO1955 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strawberries are an interesting and delightful burst of flavor in the morn on the more. So has been bumping into you...via your page. I'm new to Wikipedia and find I too am much more interested in content. So far avoiding conflict, but have read a couple of the debates. I hope you enjoy your day. I think I'll add more to my user page based on yours. Should I give my full name, anything involved with that? Alrich44 (talk) 18:10, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	well done Ashley Ashutosh gupta ultimate (talk) 18:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You added in T.A.M.I. Show the statement that John Landis and David Cassidy were in the audience. What is your source for this? An inline citation is needed, to a reliable source, when such a statement is added to an article. If you provide information about the source, I could help to format it. Thanks. Edison (talk) 21:03, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. You clearly are far more qualified than my editors at Wiley. When they got the galleys of my book, they said it was the best written financial book they had seen in a long time. I guess you know better.

As for the CMT, the only edits I made were to correct erroneous statements. You do not need to be sponsored to receive the CMT. You need to be a member of the MTA, for which you do need sponsorship. I put that information into the article. I also updated information so that readers understood the difference between NASD Regulation and FINRA, since at the time the exemption was granted, there was no such thing as FINRA. There is absolutely no conflict in those edits (and besides, I do not even hold a CMT).

I have made edits on the Elliott Wave page, which was my specialty back when I worked as a technical analyst. However, I contacted other Wikipedia editors to see if they felt it was COI before I made the edits, once I understood how Wikipedia works. As for my position at the NYSE, I suspect you are not very good with the Internet, if you cannot find out what I do here. I am glad you sent this message though, since I do need to update my page, since the NYSE is now owned by Intercontinental Exchange.

None of my editing on anything around technical analysis was done while I worked as a technical analyst. That ended in 2004 and my first edit on Wikipedia was in 2007. I have never actively sold my book (take a look on Amazon, and that will be abundantly obvious). I am not aware of any mistakes in my Wiki edits, but nobody is perfect and I always welcome corrections.

Have a good daySposer (talk) 11:09, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I get the latter, but the former? Really? 10k edits is hardly "most prolific" these days. Perhaps you need to get a reality checkpoint on that one. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reversed your edit on Art rock. We should stick to what sources say, AllMusic is one of the best sources for music-related articles, and Chris de Burgh's early albums fit very comfortably into art rock and are far closer to - for instance - the Moody Blues than Barry Manilow. Like many art rock musicians, he moved into a more mainstream direction in the '80s (even Bowie did that FFS!) and much of his early work is story-songs, not Manilow-esque ballads. Rodericksilly (talk) 14:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution but perhaps you should tone it down a bit, observations are fine but personal attacks on other editors even as a group are not really allowed, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 17:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from America. I saw your edit on Decca. Read your profile. Enjoyed it. Some good thoughts and feelings there, esp. about certain editors and editing habits at Wikipedia. Instructive, constructive, encouraging. I'm going to study your image coding to see how it's supposed to be done. I've only read the picture tutorial. You are a camera buff. For years I've kicked around getting a camera. I've never owned one. Photos make me sad. I wonder if "goodly" is a British word. I never see it or hear it here. Best,
–Vmavanti (talk) 18:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ashley Pomeroy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Ashley Pomeroy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:12, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just added some some discussion on the likely lens used for HAL 9000 based on work you had done eight years ago that might be of interest. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 16:34, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ashley Pomeroy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ashley Pomeroy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking for a period of 3 months. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 09:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reverberation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strymon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you do, Ashley, do not give up your day job! 1.146.204.132 (talk) 15:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akai CD3000XL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akai CD3000XL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

North8000 (talk) 18:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

G'day Ashley, hope this finds you well. You recently added some detail to the See also section of the article McLaren MP4-18 is this in line with the anual of Style regarding see also sections? I know a brief explanation for tangential topics whose relation may be unclear is welcome, but I thought it was apparent. Regardless, I have no strong feelings about this, and I'll leave it as is. Just like your thoughts. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 21:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]