• Archive 1 (until September 19, 2007): User talk:Aqwis/Archive1
• Archive 2 (until January 13, 2007): User talk:Aqwis/Archive2
• Archive 3 (until April 4, 2008): User talk:Aqwis/Archive3
• Archive 4 (until June 27, 2008): User talk:Aqwis/Archive4
• Archive 5 (until June 18, 2009): User talk:Aqwis/Archive5
• Archive 6 (until January 16, 2009): User talk:Aqwis/Archive6

---

Hope you are still up for this. If so, please help me fix it up when you get the chance. By the way, i've been to Bergen twice in my life - last time was a year and a half ago. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 07:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please return to talk page discussion on 2000s and be helping to decided what is important to put in there. it is not good now at all. 70.153.230.93 (talk) 01:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have been very busy for the past few days. I will, however, comment on the article shortly. --Aqwis (talk) 15:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction on Tromsø. I usually check the names added by anonymous IPs, but quite often they are not notable or it is simply vandalism, and it has become instinctive for me to revert if the person doesn't have an article. Sorry for not checking it. Hayden120 (talk) 10:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. :) --Aqwis (talk) 10:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am contacting you because you are listed as a participant for WikiProject Norway, and the above-mentioned article is sourced by all Norwegian-language references. Moreover, the references do not appear to support notability; they might be mere trivial references to the subject. Since these sources are all offline, and I do not speak or read Norwegian, I'm hoping whether you can assist me in determining whether the article qualifies for speedy deletion. Many thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 12:53, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May I have rollback rights?--Curtis23's Usalions 20:26, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--Curtis23's Usalions 02:13, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: his request had been denied at WP:RFPERM (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:02, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consider his request re-reviewed, then. --Aqwis (talk) 13:17, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that HJ Mitchell, who originally denied the request, has said he's fine with this. But imho, it doesn't seem entirely appropriate to just go along with it when you discover you've been forum shopped and have inadvertently overrode another administrator's decision without discussing it with them. Still, all's well that ends well, I'm happy with him keeping the rollback right. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 18:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please have rollback rights? MichaelJackson231 (talk) 11:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Aqwis, I was wondering if you could help me get into the edit filter managers group, please? If you want to, comment here/question me here! Thanks! Endofskull (talk) 22:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Spotlight Newsletter, Issue VII : September 2010
Help us collaborate and move the project forward by joining our IRC chat room today! Articles The current article is : Trauma (medicine)
Wikiproject: We are attempting to revive this project (yet again) after nearly a year of inactivity and we want some help. Please do come by out IRC channel.
About the articles: Current article is Trauma (medicine), started at a C-class, hoping for at least GA-class.
Home · Change Subscription · Unsubscribe

Hello Aqwis,

I'm not sure if you can help with this, I just clicked an 'A' administrator - if you can help I'd appreciate it.

I keep writing a page for the Cornucopia Institute, and it keeps getting deleted. I have made sure to comply with as many of the rules I can find, I've adjusted the format so it follows the style of other organization's pages similar to this one so I don't understand why it's so quickly deleted?!? Can you help?

I tried to communicate with the people who deleted them prior but their talk boxes wouldn't work for me. I was going to attempt to put a 'hangon' tag on the article, but I couldn't find it like I was directed to. I'm trying to write a legitimate article for this organization because I believe firmly they should be on here and would be useful on here. I've done as much reading as I can and am not sure what to do next.

Please help. Gardenerlynn (talk) 02:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC)gardenerlynn[reply]

The article List of people from Molde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

per suggestion merged to Molde no incoming links except redirects to delete when prod expires

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:59, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations Aqwis, your image Image:Fløyen view on Bergen edit.jpg was the Random Picture of the Day! It looked like this:

.

- Presidentman (talk · contribs) (Talkback) Random Picture of the Day 01:31, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I very recently published an article on Wikipedia and it was quickly deleted. The article was called "Stigma Identity Management", and I believe it to have been wrongfully deleted. I was wondering if you would be willing to userfy the page for me or at least provide a second opinion on why the article fell under the category of "promotional", as I can see nothing promotional about it. Any assistance you can provide is much appreciate. Thank you.

IdentityManagement (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was the admin who deleted that article. I'm restoring it to mainspace under the name "Stigma management" , as the title used "Stigma Identity Management" does not seem to be in use. (and, given the user name, I assumed COI & promotionalism of a related service, which may have been over-hasty. I havealso advised the user to take another username. DGG ( talk ) 15:25, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Aqwis,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 04:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I am currently too busy to participate in this. --Aqwis (talk) 17:06, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am new here and cannot rollback, but there is vandalism on Wikipedia:Files for upload. Please roll it back. Thanks. Rarkenin (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Someone rolled it back just after you posted. --Aqwis (talk) 17:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi saw you just zapped Car trim level acronym, see Trim level acronym as well, this is the third creation of the same page in 24 hours. Cheers! CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 21:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gone. --Aqwis (talk) 21:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saw that, btw, user just recreated Car trim level acronym as a redirect to Car Acronym. Don't know if this is okay? Leave it up to you and your mop ;-) CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 21:48, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably fine. --Aqwis (talk) 22:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get a chance to see this before it was A7'ed (looks like it got tagged and deleted very quickly), but given that the band has a release on Gold Standard Laboratories and a bio and two reviewed albums on Allmusic ([1]), this doesn't look like a clear-cut case. Would you mind restoring it so I can take a second look and see if it merits inclusion? I suppose you could PROD it along the way, which would at least give me time to look over its current state. Chubbles (talk) 01:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Aqwis (talk) 14:00, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:FrigilianaPano3.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Julia\talk 18:31, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well that was quite unexpected! --Aqwis (talk) 22:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Norway for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 18:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aqwis,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:FrigilianaPano3.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 9, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-02-09. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you as an administrator please have a look here and help out, thanks. HempFan (talk) 20:33, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar

I appreciate Your Contributions To the Wikipedia community . I Doff my hat for you. with all due respect i wish To humbly seek your Help in contesting or reviewing and restoring an article by Name Olagist that has been Marked for speedy Deletion. i strongly believe in you and i believe i didn't go out of context in writing the article rather it was due to its immense Contribution to the Nigerian Education Sector . i hope to hear from you soon . Thanks in Anticipation Mikebilz (talk) 19:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aqwis.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Forever. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Forever redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dysklyver 22:21, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — JJMC89 bot 00:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir, I'm a active user of Wikipedia. And I have requested for permission for helping Wikipedia for a safer place and help fellow Wikipedian's. If you feel I need more practice though, I'll be happy to gain more experience. So, I would like to grab your attention. Im extremely sorry if I words are rude towards you sir. Thank you for taking the time to review my case, and have a nice day! AR.Dmg (talk) 12:15, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you please help me to move an userspace draft about an award-winning composer into article space? I would appreciate this a lot if you could review it or tell me who could review the article. The draft is about Wojciech Waleczek—a succesful pianist from Poland whose numerous achievements deserve to be celebrated with his own Wikipedia page. He took 3rd prize at the Premio Mario Zanfi competition and was the absolute winner of the 4th Franz Liszt National Piano Competition—to name just a few of his accomplishments. Mr Waleczek already has his articles on German and Polish Wikipedia. Hope to hear back from you. Regards, AngelOfDestiny (talk) 13:46, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Start Class.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 01:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Wikipedia:NO! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 4 § Wikipedia:NO! until a consensus is reached. Capsulecap ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Collagenous colitis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inflammatory. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Collagenous colitis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]