Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Dengero (talk) 09:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

• Should you be interested, leave a note on my talk page. Best. Wifione ^Message 09:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Anbu, Are we going for GA review for the Chennai collabs. Please let the forum know - if there are gaps, we can address and push for it. Ssriram mt (talk) 00:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Replied at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chennai/Collaborations of the month --Anbu121 (talk me) 03:03, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Anbu, I am working on the map and it's almost complete. I am expecting it to be done this weekend. Thanks for the Barnstar. Happy editing :) --Challengethelimits (talk) 01:27, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing my River Arun error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.15.11.47 (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

A page you created, Grand Venus Mall, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Phearson (talk) 17:42, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Please read the article to which it redirects to. --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:44, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Please point out to me the reference that shows this mall's alternative name. Phearson (talk) 17:49, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Here you go: http://www.thehindu.com/life-and-style/leisure/article3558600.ece --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:51, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Ponyo has already retracted the speedy del. I am satisfied. Phearson (talk) 17:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Please look into Sharad Kumar Dixit. I have created the article but am unsure if all the details that i have entered there are correct. Used many unreliable sources. Help me out in verying/improving it please. And add many references if you can. Could you tell me other Indian users whom I can contact? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scbs 2007 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

It looks like copy pasted from different sources. You can't do that. --Anbu121 (talk me) 18:36, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

That's why i asked for your help. There are not a lot of articles on this person. the few that are present have redundant data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scbs 2007 (talk • contribs) 20:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Right now, don't I don't have enough time except for putting the copyright tag on the article. Post on the talk page of the article the list of sources from where you copy pasted. Let me see if I can do some copy editing. By the way, if you copy paste again, you could be blocked. --Anbu121 (talk me) 20:34, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

/:) Ok! Don't need you to look into it. Thanks anyways! Scbs_2007 (talk)

Being for more than a year here and having contributed constructively, I thought you would be aware of copyright policies of Wikipedia. Your first reply appeared very sarcastic to me. Read this (Wikipedia:Copyright violations) if you are not aware of it till now and try to remove the copy-pasted content yourself. --Anbu121 (talk me) 21:57, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Ever come across this: Wikipedia:Civility There was absolutely no need of retorting in the way you did! \:) Let's end it here! PEACE!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scbs 2007 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

I was right. You do know about all the policies and guidelines here and still you have chosen to copy paste and call others to clean up your mess. Initially I thought of dropping a warning template for copyright on your talk page, but you would have already known that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Anbu121 (talk me) 04:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

thanks for the help,,,,,,,,,,--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi there. I'm glad this page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akash_Maharaj) was deleted, but do you have any idea why the first line of the pre-deleted page ("Akash Maharaj is a former Yale student whose acceptance was rescinded...") still shows up in google search and why the whole page can be easily viewed in cache? Is there a way to delete that too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonfoerster (talk • contribs) 09:33, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

I guess it takes one or two days for google to refresh its cache. But, I am not very sure about it. Try asking it in the Help Desk --Anbu121 (talk me) 09:38, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

are monitoring his activities? 124.176.20.38

LIER I WASNT VANDALISINGG DIE DIE DIE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katiealwill (talk • contribs) 15:02, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

my page was not to threaten or harm anybody it is to my friend jake costello we edit pictures of each other all the time and crop face and bodies just for a laugh so now i thought i would make a page on here about him there is nothing in this that would harm him attack him or make him upset or angry in any way — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nath2k10 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not the place to play with your friend. What you do is called as vandalism. If you continue to create such pages, you could get blocked. --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:06, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

it's not playing its a social interaction that caused no harm it is not "called as" or classed as vandalism as it is not harming anyone it is not creating discomfort and it is neither bothering anyone buy you block me if you want i couldnt care less you just a fucking guy who to serious

Thanks for your suggestion.Do you know any editor who has expertise in file related issues.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 17:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

You can contact User:INeverCry. --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Article is not notable and is being used to harass and defame an individual. Please DO NOT REVERT. 75.70.221.14 (talk) 19:21, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

If you think it is not notable, you can nominate it for deletion through Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Don't blank it. --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:22, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

It is defamatory and therefore must be blanked immediately. It is illegal. By reverting it you are aiding in the commission of a crime. 75.70.221.14 (talk) 19:25, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

All the information in the article is sourced. Wikipedia articles are written by using information which is publicly available and hence is not illegal. --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

The sources are invalid, and being used to defame. Any further revision of my edits and I will make sure you are charged as an accessory. 75.70.221.14 (talk) 19:35, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Only some of the references are blogs, but you have removed far too many sources and content. --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:49, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

The IP (75.70.221.14) belongs to the owner of the site. He has a total COI in this. 2A02:2498:E002:70:0:0:0:20 (talk) 22:13, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes I deleted White Terror. It is hopelessly biased propaganda and an editor claims possession and refused incremental improvement. Best to delete it and start again. cwmacdougall 21:29, 5 November 2012

If talk page discussions doesn't lead to a consensus, you can take it to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard --Anbu121 (talk me) 20:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion. I have now filed a complaint on the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard. cwmacdougall 23:29, 5 November 2012

With my appeals to the NPOV and Dispute Resolution noticeboards having failed to spark interest from administrators, and with consensus apparently impossible, I fear that edit warring will reoccur... Any suggestions? cwmacdougall 22:40, 11 November 2012

Did you tried Wikipedia:Requests for comment? If RFC doesn't work out, Mediation Committee is the last resort for content disputes in Wikipedia. But filing a case there would require consent of all parties involved. I haven't read the discussions on the talk page fully, but having a glance and looking at the revision history of the page, I could smell some socking. Didn't you? --Anbu121 (talk me) 07:45, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

You mean sock-puppets? Certainly not on my part. I suspected EverlastingGaze of writing under another name, but am not sure. How do you tell? Re further appeals, the current editing block will end shortly; I will see how things progress then. cwmacdougall 8:44, 12 November 2012

I thought it was apropriate and intelligent BTW i am adam chu — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.33.44.253 (talk) 21:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm just warning you because you do too much changes... I don't want to be unpleasant with you... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.35.208.194 (talk) 15:07, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

It had a Creative Commons licence, but of a "no commercial use, no derivatives" type, so not compatible. Even if it had a genuinely free licence, I would have deleted it as promotional, given the unencyclopaedic and hagiographic nature of the text, cheers Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:44, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

FYI, I've blocked User:75.70.221.14 for two weeks for the threat of legal action above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:14, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Sombody hacked my account this is a mistake I am terribly sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caitlinmf11 (talk • contribs) 02:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

hi anbu, the article you deleted now,wasnt a copy but i re edited and added only relevant info and established notability,thereby please remove the tag.(Harishrawat11 (talk) 12:30, 11 November 2012 (UTC))

As far as I remember, the article has the same content as it was before. Since the deleted content is not viewable, let an administrator decide whether the content is same or not. --Anbu121 (talk me) 12:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear Anbu, Diwali greetings. :) Just check out the template "Perth Rail Yard" ("Perth Station layout and surrounding railyard") in Perth railway station. Is it possible to have a similar one for Chennai Central? I'm sure it would be a great value addition. Thanks. Rasnaboy (talk) 04:04, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Including basin bridge junction or just the platforms? --Anbu121 (talk me) 05:40, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Well. Chennai Central is a complex terminus with several parts in addition to the Main terminus (including the suburban Moore market terminus). It has several yards and other railway aids, namely, the Basin Bridge Train Care Centre, the Basin Bridge loco yard, and the Salt Cotaurs goods yard. Although some of these are named as Basin Bridge, they are technically part of the Central complex located at the northern side of the complex (except the Basin Bridge Junction, which can be treated as a separate station), since they have been built to serve the terminus. I think it would be better if there is mention of these in the layout map as well. Would like to know your opinion. :) Rasnaboy (talk) 05:56, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

I am thinking to group them into two templates:One for layout of platforms alone, another for depicting the connection between the station, goods yard, loco yard, junction, traincare center (In this case the station will be shown as one entity without platforms). --Anbu121 (talk me) 06:06, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

The more I look into it, the less I feel like I understand what they're trying to do; certainly I copy-paste infoboxii from similar articles when trying to write. As it stands it doesn't seem like an urgent problem, so a PROD seems like a perfectly sensible solution. I've watchlisted it so if anyone contests it we can look for a better solution (which would probably depend on why). WilyD 09:45, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Your comments are invited: Talk:Sutlej#Source_of_Sutlej_discussion LADave (talk) 18:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

You requested a speedy deletion, which I did not find prudent. I edited it and added sources and more information. It is a popular youtube channel so it is not "unremarkable" Rosscoolguy (talk) 01:42, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

I have removed the speedy deletion template. But still, the article has only one independent source. The youtube links to the channel itself doesn't qualify as a source. --Anbu121 (talk me) 06:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

I have deleted the section in Arvind Kejriwal as the statement had no reference. I read the three references mentioned, including one written by Arundhati Roy and two other news articles which did not even include a word like, Youth for Equality. So either you undo your contribution or I would have to repeat my act of deleting the paragraph.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lonelykartika (talk • contribs)

Please read this reference again. It does mention 'Youth for Equality' clearly. --Anbu121 (talk me) 03:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Greetings Anbu; there is a user on the black people article who has sought to include some of the material that was deemed offtopic in the recent rfc discussion. Specifically, text and an image on Australian Aborigines as "black people" [1]. I've tried explaining to and quoting for him what the community's decision was but to little effect. If it's not any trouble, could you perhaps clarify for him what exactly was the general consensus? It should only take a minute or two. Kind regards - Soupforone (talk) 00:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for inviting me. Even I am not fully aware of the discussion and consensus. I can see that the user is in good conversation with you and I don't see a need for explicit intervention. --Anbu121 (talk me) 12:32, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

I understand. Perhaps, then, you'll consider weighing in on the new rfc? Kind regards-- Soupforone (talk) 23:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Anbu. With the kind of development one can see in Chennai Central article over the past month due to the collaboration, which has made it increase almost three-fold, we can see that articles of similar kind should be taken for COTM, since they can be improved substantially. The efforts are much prolific and results are encouraging than with solely working on an already improved one (like Vandalur Zoo). Now I realise what you suggested initially is correct—taking one already improved article (a B-class one) and another yet-to-be-improved one (a start/stub one). This way, I think, we can improve the start-class article substantially and tweak the B-class one to the GA level. Do you think this will work? Can we nominate two articles this time, or should we solely concentrate on a single article at a time? Think we can discuss this with other editors too. Rasnaboy (talk) 12:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Can you take this to the project's talk page and invite regular members for a discussion. --Anbu121 (talk me) 12:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Anbu, Its COTM time. --Challengethelimits (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding. I was traveling for past 1 week. I really don't mind if any of you pitch in and do the routine if I forget to do so. That's why I haven't explicitly mentioned my name as coordinator. --Anbu121 (talk me) 12:12, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Hey. Thanks for taking care of that. I'm going to remove the archive hold on the section and (hopefully!) we're done with this. --regentspark (comment) 17:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Re: my rollback on Chennai Mass Rapid Transit System, took a look and I'm genuinely mystified -- I have no recollection of doing that, much less any rationale for it, so I can only presume I clicked it by accident. Thanks for fixing it, and sorry for the trouble! Jpatokal (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:25, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your reverts at CSI College of Engineering. Ever since news reports came out regarding placement scam in the college, IPs have started removing content without explanation. And I am handling them alone (I think I am the only one watching the page). I've used up 3 reverts for the day. I don't think contacting the ips in their talk pages would be useful since they keep hopping. The current state of the article is a mess. Can you please revert the article to this version by makecat? And I doubt the IPs would stop with this. I've never gone to RFPP. Do you think this article requires semi protection since I suppose I am the the only watcher? Please give a tb at my talk page if you reply, as I am mostly in my mobile nowadays. Cheers. Suraj T 14:50, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry, the version that are asking for has very sensible information including names of the people invovled in it. Given that we don't have any reliable online source, I prefer not to revert to that version. The current version mentions about the scam without naming people. I have watchlisted the article and will be monitoring it. --Anbu121 (talk me) 15:09, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

That's right. I've seen the newspapers myself. Hence I left it stand. Can't find any online mentions. for your ref: [2] from dinamalar, 26 Nov. I'll try to get online sources. I suppose we cant add the sceen shot. Suraj T 15:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

And thanks for watchlisting. :) Suraj T 15:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify, 22:28, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I have no idea how to mark up anything on Wikipedia or any of the local etiquette.

Found some massive vandalism rendering an article unreadable here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_management

Investigating, I found a long history of similar vandalism. You were the last person to comment on the offending IP's talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:64.109.209.62

I guess the page is fixed and the IP has been blocked now. Anyways, I have watchlisted. --Anbu121 (talk me) 05:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

May I suggest as these two pages have been vandalised more than once that they are protected at least as a temporary measure?Joshuaselig (talk) 21:31, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Page protection can be requested at WP:RFPP. But in this case, the vandalism has been done by a registered user, not IPs. The user has been given a final warning and if the user vandalizes one more time, the account will be blocked. Since the disruption is by only one user, protection is not an apt measure. --Anbu121 (talk me) 04:55, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Those "Newspaper sites" are also printing wrong spelling. Actually only "g" letter should be there. Not "gg". See this wikipedia article name for agarwal spelling : Aarthi Agarwal. Thank you. Raghusri (talk) Raghusri 11:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

What evidence do you have to say that the newspapers are spelling it wrong? --Anbu121 (talk me) 11:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5