Thanks for participating in today's workshop. Please could you take a few minutes to provide feedback at Wikipedia talk:GLAM/SLNSW? --99of9 (talk) 11:32, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

from: 210.241.199.201 —Preceding undated comment added 15:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you for your excellent presentation! Great to see innovation from our libraries. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk 04:32, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article DIY rainbow crossing‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 168.12.253.66 (talk) 15:15, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a suggestion for what should be done about this article on the the article's talk page. Wittylama 11:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Awarded to Aliaretiree for persistence with List of newspapers in New South Wales in the face of a daunting combination of expanding scope and a need for great precision. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 11:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Australia is looking for experienced Wikipedians to help out at training sessions across New South Wales, in particular in Newcastle, Wollongong, Port Macquarie and in Parkes. If you're interested, the details are at the following link:

• http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaau-l/2013-July/003677.html

We'd love to see you there! Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:58, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orlady (talk) 08:02, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your commitment to developing the world's body of information on 19th century homemaking books. Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	thankyou for expanding the Eva Johnson article Richard Bruce Bradford (talk) 01:27, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harrias ^talk 00:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the sands and wise directories need lots of work - I had only started the wise for wa, but in the geneaology section of what is left in the wa state library (shrinking like a harvest of violets, shelves reduced, stock reduced, staff reduced, and even leaks about the whole service being on the block so to speak) there are victorian and tasmanian live copies of old wise directories.. but time is in the way - good on you for starting the sands one anyways - the wise (and I am sure there are others as well) - cheers satusuro 11:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With the wise article - I noticed the habit of links in the first sentence - sorry to be a stickler, but really, lead sentences and paras are meant to be summaries with no links - per MOS. Not sure where the links in the first line thing has come from, but unless I see otherwise that is what I have expected... WP:LEAD satusuro 09:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:03, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aliaretiree. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Photographic plate, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
• instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Repeatedly adding information about State Library of New South Wales where you are employed to articles about the Library, changing article content without consensus and failing to address concerns on discussions posted on Talk page per WP policy. NotaBene 鹰百利 ^Talk 13:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NOTABENE, yes I did forget to write on the talk page before editing... definitely something I should have remembered to do as it is covered in the SLNSW staff editing policy on the SLNSW project page - my mistake. I was actually trying to improve the referencing on the article to include as many non-COI sources as possible and was very surprised to see your edit that the item in question was not in the collections of the SLNSW so added a citation to the record in the catalogue. My motivation was to improve the information available on wiki about an item on the Australian Memory of the World register (a subset of the UNESCO project) but I guess rules must trump facts with citations in this case. I hope you will continue to expand the article to be more balanced in scope and not limited only to the scientific applications of this photographic technique, for the benefit of future readers. Aliaretiree (talk) 11:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aliaretiree You missed the point of the concerns raised. Not only is the source of the information potentially biased, you as an editor of the articles have the conflict of interest, and should not have made the edits to the articles in question. It is not a matter of rules versus facts. You are employed by an organisation, writing about that organisation, where the only source of the information is that organisation itself (a primary source, in case you are unclear of the concern regarding potential bias), and you had an undisclosed conflict of interest, as did your colleague Margaret.I.Riley when that person made similar edits to Wikipedia articles regarding the place with which you both were affiliated, yet you see no potential for bias or conflict of interest? Your flippant remark that this is merely “rules must trump facts with citations” displays a cavalier attitude regarding an understanding about bias. (N.B., it was only after you and your colleague repeatedly added incorrectly sourced information that was challenged that you added a proper citation). The idea of discussing on the Talk page is to gain a consensus from disinterested parties who would then make any edits, not for you to add potentially biased information to an online encyclopedia.

Being affiliated with an organisation should preclude you from editing articles about that organisation, not just in violation of your institution’s policy, but Wikipedia guidelines (vide supra, “avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organisation, its competitors, projects or products;”) and academic ethics as well. You should have mentioned the source of the information on the Talk page, and let unbiased editors decide on the use of the information and make the edits, especially since your sources were a primary source from the organisation itself, and a 60 year old magazine article. I hope you refrain from making similar edits to Wikipedia where you have a conflict of interest, even if you disclose that conflict, and where you use the organisation itself as the sole source of information (id est, a primary source) about that organisation. NotaBene 鹰百利 ^Talk

Good work on the Thancoupie article. Jschnur (talk) 07:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is now too big and too long. Something needs to be done. An average user of wikipedia could not easily access. Strongly suggest it is broken up into regions and Sydney. JarrahTree 05:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am quite concerned that effort is put in by someone to specifically take it on as a task, at some stage, so it would be very useful to have a conversation on wiki or off, as to how it is done - as the size is beyond a usual user of wikipedia to deal with. Rather than go to noticeboards and other similar exposed locations that can invoke the usual suspects, I was hoping you might offer some suggestions or criterion. In western australia we have gone to regions. Your comment(s) would be appreciated JarrahTree 01:18, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JarrahTree I appreciate your input, we will review it and try to make it more user friendly, but for now it is the most complete list of newspapers published in NSW that exists in any source. The history of settlement in NSW and the history of newspaper publishing in NSW, which seems to have had a golden age in the late 1800's - WWI, make dividing into Sydney and regional areas an unworkable solution as the greater Sydney region is now quite extensive but was not when many of the historical newspaper titles were published. As you can tell from the history, this list article is constantly being updated and referenced by a lot of people creating articles about the newspapers themselves as they are digitised in the national digitisation program so any major changes will need to be consultative. Aliaretiree (talk) 01:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If only completeness was an aspect of what it is all WP:ABOUT.

I really think that the task solver doesnt necessarily have be you, I, or any one particular editor, but somehow even a taskforce aka group of interested eds in discussion about newspaper lists for australia - in other words the consultative process amongst editors that you raise is very important.

At this stage, considering your response, perhaps alpha or era breakups. If you have a look at the Western Australia project geographical lists - there are singular completeness collections that have been broken up into separate alpha components simply to make them manageable, as anything otherwise is well beyond a users capacity to load on mobiles, or older and lower power computers.

It would be good to think there is a positive forward thinking process that might resolve the issue of the size, and that there is a recognition of a definite need for the item to be made more amenable to users who are not on high capacity broadband crunchers JarrahTree 08:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that parent and child cats (some confuse the issue by referring to subcat and supercat) are not needed on the articles you edited today - and most have been removed. 'Literary awards' are generic for all, 'Australian literary awards' is a 'child' and the parent does not get added. Thanks. JarrahTree 13:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aliaretiree,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Robert Merlini for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Snickers2686 (talk) 02:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aliaretiree, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 16:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Aliaretiree: please note, that in relation to the conflict-of-interest discussion above, autopatrol flag will put less eyes on your creations, however if you think a page is a possible COI, using Wikipedia:Articles for creation may be appropriate. Happy editing, — xaosflux ^Talk 16:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you are arranging an editathon on March 10, you might be interested in Women in Red's plans for Women's History Month. We have also developed Ten Simple Rules for new editors interested in creating biographies, which might be useful. We also have redlists on architecture: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Architecture and Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Architects.

		Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons. New: "Women's History Month" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 17:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: many thanks, I'll add those links.Aliaretiree (talk) 01:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aliaretiree. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aliaretiree. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Balmoral, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quite concerned that the new batch of user names are actually using SLNSW in their usernames - please help them understand the problems of having usernames that include where they edit from - specifically WP:COI thanks JarrahTree 10:54, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

it is really great to see that people have changed their usernames - great! Trust the training goes well !! JarrahTree 03:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping an eye out for our newbie editors. The SLNSW accounts are ones I set up to use in training under supervision and then they get their own unique ones set up. 8 new editors introduced to the wiki world today! Aliaretiree (talk) 03:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent - I do hope they get good positive responses to their work! Please let them know that there are always Australian editors who really want to help if they ever get stuck! JarrahTree 04:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for coming today and sharing your skills and expertise with our attendees - your support was very much appreciated and made a big difference! Rubicon49bce (talk) 11:45, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of LGBT rights activists in Sydney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of LGBT rights activists in Sydney until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 16:33, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will make sure it is salted into a user page or somewhere, and further development into a different type of article will almost certainly survive later... Will need to explain all offline sometime soon - its complicated... JarrahTree 13:17, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw you wrote most of the Eirene Mort article - great work! I’ve been going through the list of missing articles of ADB women and slowly trying to them written. I was really happy about Zara Aronson in case you are interested 😀 anyway, I just wanted to thank you for your contributions and I am genuinely grateful for your high quality work on that article! - Chris.sherlock (talk) 01:55, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to the City of Sydney Picture This editathon. --99of9 (talk) 03:58, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aliaretiree

Queensland Memory is participating in Wikipedia’s 1Lib1Ref campaign again this year.

I found your name in the project pages for previous years and wanted to know if you would like to do some editing again this year?

Tania Schafer and I have scheduled 2 pop in sessions in the Edge’s Digital Media Lab, 10am-12noon Thursday 27th May or Wednesday 2nd June but the great thing about Wikipedia is you can do it wherever and whenever suits you! T

If you’re interested in helping us get the number of State Library edits up this year please read the 2021 project page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/State_Library_of_Queensland/1Lib1Ref_2021.

Before you get started please sign up to the Dashboard so we can keep track of the number of edits SLQ has made. Or send me your Wiki name I can sign you up.

This year we are focusing on getting our JOL Blogs referenced or added as External Links on relevant Wikipedia pages, I can email you a document for blog content ideas. However if this doesn’t interest you see our project page for other ideas.

Let Tania Schafer or myself know if you have any questions.

Thanks

Troykeith85 (talk) 05:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article This Week in Libraries has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Aliaretiree, Your contributions to article of John Metcalfe (librarian) and William Herbert Ifould helped me quite a bit in drafting an article about the Free Library Movement in Australia and New South Wales so i was inclined to ask if you'd be interested in adding to the 'history' section and the 'people' section of the article. Thank you.

Here is the draft: Free Library Movement Avast rumali (talk) 10:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]