Archives

no archives yet (create)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:41, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Battle of Guling, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Battle of Xingyang (190). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:58, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Battle of Guling, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_guling.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Battle of Guling and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Battle of Guling, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Battle of Guling. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Battle of Guling with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at . Leave a note at Talk:Battle of Guling saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! _dk (talk) 20:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ahendra, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 02:22, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Muslim conquest of Khorasan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KJ ^Discuss? 14:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Battle of Kili, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www2.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_kili.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Burs

added a link pointing to Burs

Battle of Kili

added a link pointing to Zafar Khan

Muslim conquest of Khorasan

added a link pointing to Marv

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for your contributions. One note when splitting off content from one article to a new one: The Wikipedia license requires an attribution trail so we can always find who added any text to any article. When splitting off an article, that needs to be noted somewhere so we can trace back to the original article. So, if you could make an edit summary for the first edit to the new page say something like "Copied content from (old article), see that page for attribution", that will help tremendously. Thanks again for your work! Crow^Caw 22:04, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Bishapur (643-644), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fars and Misr. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Al-Qa'qa'a ibn Amr at-Tamimi

added a link pointing to Hormuz

Battle of Kili

added a link pointing to Kili

Battle of Sind

added a link pointing to Zafar Khan

Dhiraar bin Al-Azwar

added a link pointing to Hijra

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Feint

added a link pointing to Han River

Murakami Yoshikiyo

added a link pointing to Yamamoto Kansuke

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Jiangling (208)

added links pointing to Chen Jiao and Li Tong

Zhu Ling (Three Kingdoms)

added a link pointing to Zhang Lu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Rajputs, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 21:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While you did appear to source most of your additions, which is great, the sources were in many cases pretty dubious. We require that people self-identify the caste to which we say they are affiliated. Please read User:Sitush/Common#Castelists before adding anything back there. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 21:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OkayAhendra (talk) 22:04, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Uthman may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:41, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahendra, I think it'll be helpful for your article creation to read WP:WikiProject Three Kingdoms for a sense of how a Three Kingdoms article should be structured, how they should begin, etc. _dk (talk) 22:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice, Underbar. i will try to work how to be more structured in editing three kingdoms article by your linkAhendra (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WeiYan Painting of Sanguo Yanyi CH Brewitt Taylor.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Weixan02.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wei Yan statue sichuan.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Wei Yan statue sichuan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Deng Ai

added links pointing to Han and Sun Jun

Battle of Jalandhar

added a link pointing to Zafar Khan

Isa Khan

added a link pointing to Rangpur

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in WP:QAI. Requests by users who are not yet members should go to the talk page where they will get more attention. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SD0001. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Umayyad conquest of Hispania without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SD0001 (talk) 09:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kishoreganj district.GIF. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Rajputs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Battle of Ain Jalut, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

• If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
• If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dhiraar bin Al-Azwar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bukhari. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dirar Bin Al-Azwar Mosque.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dirar Bin Al-Azwar Mosque.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sir.. i've ask the Pic owner and he gave me the permission for non Profit. here's the evidence:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/samdefranc/4214867817/

Your latest edit,[1] appears to use a primary source(Fatu al Buldan) and a questionable source by Mazhar-ul-Haq(of whom I could find nothing about). You might want to find better sources than those two. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:44, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Capture of Medina-Sidonia (712) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Far too short for a separate article - can be covered in Medina-Sidonia#History.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 23:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-Ghazi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oromo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit on Timur. Justin Marozzi is a writer and journalist, not a historian. If you can find a reliable source(s), feel free to re-add the information. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not do this again. As was clearly stated in the edit summary where it was removed, see User:Sitush/Common#Castecats. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 03:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I reverted you, the category is not to be used for people. Do it again and you shall be banished for eternity.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 19:55, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Mamluk Midfa.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Fire arrows and torpedoes in military medieval.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ismail Ibn Sharif, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Military history of the Mali Empire page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Baibars

added a link pointing to Tarsus

Mali Empire

added a link pointing to Songhai

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Maritime history of Somalia into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Doug Weller (talk) 14:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Murud-Janjira page, your edit caused a duplicate page number error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Musa I of Mali page, your edit caused a duplicate page number error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Abu Bakr II page, your edit caused a duplicate page number error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Mali Empire page, your edit caused a duplicate page number error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited African military systems to 1800, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Embankments. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Janjira State

added links pointing to Hormuz, Muscat and Ottoman

Battle of Ravi

added a link pointing to Ravi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Algiers expedition (1541), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mali Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yemeni. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mali Empire may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 8}}. First published in 1981 by Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-22422-5. | page=76 & 300(quotation of [[Ibn Batutta]]: ''Then I travelled to the town of Kawkaw, which is a great town on

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:34, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Battle of Burs, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.alim.org/library/biography/khalifa/content/KUM/18/19#sthash.mJYX6Vx5.dpuf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Battle of Burs and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Battle of Burs, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Battle of Burs. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Battle of Burs with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at . Leave a note at Talk:Battle of Burs saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Proofreader (talk) 16:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Muslim conquest of Kerman has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Battle of Hormizd-Ardashir, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from Gautier H. A. Juynboll (translator) (1989), The History of al-Tabari Vol. 13: The Conquest of Iraq, Southwestern Persia, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Battle of Hormizd-Ardashir and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Battle of Hormizd-Ardashir, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Battle of Hormizd-Ardashir. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Battle of Hormizd-Ardashir with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at . Leave a note at Talk:Battle of Hormizd-Ardashir saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ahendra. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:14, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Caliph Abu Bakar Ibrahim Al Baghdadi.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Malik Ambar page, your edit caused a redundant parameter error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ahendra. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:800px-Muslim Cemetery Eastern Wall Jerusalem 14.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 06:46, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 'Ubadah ibn al-Samit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kufah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:29, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sure, i will restrain from edit war @.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:29, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

but let me give my reason

let me give my reason, the source which complained by HistoryofIran was non RS

• firstly he had title from legit academy:

1 tun abdul razak 2 Medina university

proof: https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_Basalamah

• secondly he had official crew which operated in youtube and has renewable backup source for his media which can be accounted for

proof: https://play.google.com/store/?utm_source=apac_Med&utm_medium=hasem&utm_content=Jan0220&utm_campaign=Evergreen&pcampaignid=MKT-DR-apac-id-1003227-Med-hasem-py-Evergreen-Jan0220-Text_Search_BKWS-BKWS%7cONSEM_kwid_43700012165119803_creativeid_382795658080_device_c_kwd_kwd-25374944786_geoid_9072592_network_g&gclid=CjwKCAiAg9rxBRADEiwAxKDTunwNhRYgTiOW6ZZ9YuFkHCqZi3xt7HNBY--s4kTdrRF_Ivod-W_9thoC22MQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

• thirdly, he had backup from his lectures from legitimate Islamic academic organization that has been legally operate under the law of Indonesia/Government. the organization is

Hidayatullah

proof: https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidayatullah_(organisasi)Ahendra (talk) 20:41, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

edit: i also include the backup sources which uploaded by Dr. Khalid Basalamah team in the reference link= https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.khbofficial.mobile&hl=en

which always reverted by HistoryofIran, as i have said earlier Dr. Khalid Basalamah has grade title in Master of Arts and Lecturer from University of Medina and Tun Abdul Razak University in Malaysia in the field of Seerah(history of Islam) and let me put the pont that Dr Khalid activity were under the wing of legal organization of Islamic Academy study named Hidayatullah organization which legally operated under the law of Indonesian government,

which HistoryofIran reverted Ahendra (talk) 20:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:45, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating the 3 revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 21:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hello El_C

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahendra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

previously i stopped the revert war since i noticed HistoryofIran reported me. Then i gave my reason why i insisted on editing in your talk page, can my temporary block be appealed? Ahendra (talk) 21:34, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not convinced that you won't edit war in the future; how will you handle an editing dispute in the future? I'm also not sure that you understand the underlying point being made to you about the validity of what you are attempting to add as a source. I am declining your request. And do not ping other admins to unblock you, your unblock request will be visible to them. 331dot (talk) 22:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm sorry, but you were cautioned about the 3 revert rule yet you still violated it. Anyway, another admin can attend to your unblock request above. Good luck. El_C 21:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its okay, i will wait instead Ahendra (talk) 21:40, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ahendra, please stop pinging various admins — that is inappropriate. El_C 22:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahendra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

my block duration has been expired, but the notice of block still appeared

Decline reason:

The block has not expired yet. It does not expire for almost four more hours. The block was restarted when it was narrowed. Yamla (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

hello El_C, currently i am in process to discuss the [[2]] after i have been suggested by Kansasbear before i submitting it. im not engaging in edit war again after that Ahendra (talk) 11:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello brother Itaqallah. ive seen your interest in Islamic history. and i have reviewed your discussions in Battle of Mu'tah talk page. i have an idea to improve the article of that battle by staying true to the Islamic sources which saying victory for the muslims. I have good sources which qualified as reliable source with scholarly academic background who stay relying on early muslim sources. im pretty sure the source can counter criticism that casting doubts on Muslims victory based from 'orientalist contemporary sources' such as David Powers and Buhl with academic method In Sha Allah. but i need your help Ahendra (talk) 00:58, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ahendra, please do not edit by proxy. That is inappropriate. Please limit usage of this talk page while blocked to an unblock request only. Thanks. El_C 01:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hello El_C. sure. i have no ill intention by doing so anyway, im just chatting to discuss a matter to improving Battle of Mu'tah article later after my block lifted with other user who has passion in history 01:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

No ill-intention assumed, Ahendra. On second thought, I'm going to lift the sitewide block and implement a partial block on the article in question. This way you can still edit the disputed article's talk page as well as other articles. Sorry for not doing so earlier, but it's a new thing on Wikipedia and I just plain forgot about it. El_C 01:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Ahendra, you are good to go. Thanks again for your patience. El_C 01:16, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, for now i will go rest Ahendra (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: Right after his block expired, user starts edit warring by restoring his non-RS sources [3]. --HistoryofIran (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing and edit warring, clearly indicate Ahendra is here to write articles to their POV.--Kansas Bear (talk) 21:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hello Kansas Bear i can provide good reason. HistoryofIran started edit reversion to most articles i have given. i can assure you the source references i provide is reliable Ahendra (talk) 21:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring while partially blocked due to edit warring! You need to start observing WP:ONUS and gain consensus for your disputed sources before applying those contentious edits. As I told you before, the status quo ante version is the version that remains in place while a content dispute continues to be unresolved. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 00:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked over your 'Ubadah ibn al-Samit article. Quite frankly, there's a lot of good, hard work and research there, but it's too long. I imagine (though I can't cite the WP guideline) that the length of an article should be based on notability; the intent is to summarize the key points related to a topic, not to write a biography. Currently this article is nearly 70k bytes 15% larger than the article for the forth Rashidun Caliph Uthman. I'd say 10-20k bytes is more than enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonlight2001 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, his name should be Ubada (like Umar and Aisha). I'd refer to notable Wiki Sahaba articles when editing.--Moonlight2001 (talk) 23:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hello, JJMC89. okay i will request it first in Wikipedia:Requests for history merge first then, Ahendra (talk) 23:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kharijah ibn Huzafah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 03:23, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for asking. You’re welcome to use the map for your book. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Murraytheb?markasread=182734975&markasreadwiki=enwiki#Map_minor_detail 201.183.153.160 (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

kindly thank, sire Ahendra (talk) 03:25, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Zhu Qissa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ansar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Apostate wars has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:24, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jazira.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ahendra,

Thank you for creating Battle of Husayd.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The references on this page have not been prepared correctly. A reference cannot refer to this article. See WP:EXT for a guide on how to link.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 00:00, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you're welcome.. thanks for pointing problems left so it can be improved Ahendra (talk) 04:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Rashidun army has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, thank you for the warning Ahendra (talk) 15:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article is now over 121.000 bytes. Please read SIZERULE

Jellysandwich0 (talk) 22:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Make certain edits to Wikipedia are grammatical, logical, and understandable BEFORE submitting them. Many of your recent edits were poorly written and required much time and effort to correct. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 22:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rashidun army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arabian Gulf.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ahendra

Thank you for creating Early Caliphate navy.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Grand.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 02:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• {{Re|Scope creep}} Thanks Ahendra (talk) 02:39, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahendra! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam/Salaf task force, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oxyrhynchus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coptic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to thank you for your support the other day. Albertatiran (talk) 13:22, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

don't mention it bro. i just happy with constructive improvements of article Ahendra (talk) 13:28, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Bara' ibn Malik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghanima.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ubadah ibn al-Samit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spoils of War.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much my friend. You always appreciate everyone not only me by giving thanked, I saw your thank log. Thanks for giving me too. You are so kind and humble. May Allah SWT bless you! Thanks again. -- ওহিদ (talk) 23:17, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wa iyyakum. always pleasure to see active fellow wikiproject member improving Islamic coverage articles keep the good works to pimprove the history article related to Islam Ahendra (talk) 02:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zubayr ibn al-Awwam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Gordon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahendra, thank you for all your work on Islam-related articles, it is much appreciated. I do have some difficulty in reviewing your contributions since you rarely use edit summaries, and nearly always tag your edits as minor, so perhaps you could try to change this in the future? You can check WP:MINOR and WP:ES to learn more about Wikipedia best practices.

Also, I did want to let you know that I reverted one of your edits at Lord Edward's crusade, where you changed "putting its inhabitants to the sword" to "massacring its inhabitants".[4] To say that there was a massacre is very strong language. To my knowledge there aren't any sources that use that term, though if you do know of some I am open to reviewing them. I have started a thread at the article's talkpage, please feel free to participate there, thanks! --Elonka 05:53, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 10:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sure, i will check it later, sire and read about the website first. Ahendra (talk) 10:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abu Hurairah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abu Dawud.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	Season's Greetings
	Hi Ahendra! Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and a beautiful and productive New Year! पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 15:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahendra! Can you help me read the legend on this coin of Ubayd Allah ibn Abi Bakra? I think the text in front of the face of the ruler is something like "Ubayd Allah ibn Abi Bakra"... (عبيد الله بن أبي بكرة, the two vertical lines) Can you confirm? Best regards पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 19:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello sire... the bottom Arabic could be read as "Ubaydallah bin Abi Bakrah", or "Ubaydullah bin Abi Bakrah"... both name are valid reading.. your welcome sire, best regards too. Ahendra (talk) 02:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Can you tell me what the first sign in the second line in the coin legend is (the one that looks like a plane in profile ), and why is doesn't seem to appear in the modern arabic version? Is it just "أ" written horizontally? पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you're welcome, regarding that symbol. i have no idea about it. need archaeology expert to examine the symbol... my wild guess is, it either Crescent moon symbol, or maybe Persian language symbol... i don't know Persian language, so dont rely much on my guess. Ahendra (talk) 05:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 08:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Umayyad Mosque you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ahendra -- Ahendra (talk) 18:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello brother, you can use {{NoteTag}} instead of using {{#tag:ref|....|group="Notes"}} multiple times. Thanks. -- ওহিদ ^{(💬 | 📝)} 20:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the advice, bro. very helpful for my future works Ahendra (talk) 05:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Umayyad Mosque you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Umayyad Mosque for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ahendra -- Ahendra (talk) 14:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahendra! Would you be able to read which ruler is named in this coin (name in front of the face)? Best regards पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 20:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello there, @पाटलिपुत्र:. judging by the uploader description, |Arab-Sasanian coin imitating a drachm of Khosroes II (590–628), obverse: head of the king right with a winged crown, Arab inscription bismillah, ca. 650–750. From Khist Tapa, Tajikistan, i didnt remember who ruled Tajikistan during that era, but certainly Umayyad governor. nevertheless, maybe you could also ask professor Widjan Ali from Umayyad coins artifacts website, im sure can help you greatly to identify such artifacts, and recommended for Islamic archaeology such like this coin. Ahendra (talk) 00:39, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Help copy edit. Thanks you. Zasjd (talk) 06:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try, but need times while i read the style of GA article of still living person & active athlete as reference first. Ahendra (talk) 07:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zasjd:by comparing with several other athletes article such as Taufik Hidayat and Huang Yaqiong, i didnt see anything wrong or misleading with her page, why should copy edit an article which already has good structure to begin with? although as she's still living person, probably could be added her notable activities outside Badminton, maybe add "personal life" section. Ahendra (talk) 07:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Beisan (634), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghanima.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Beisan (634) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Beisan (634) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Constantine ✍ 08:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahendra! Blogs and websites are not, generally speaking, WP:RS. If you want some good, scholarly sources, that examine events in a critical manner, please contact me or other users who have been active in the topic of early Islamic history. Otherwise your efforts are counterproductive: if you rely on unreliable sources whose purpose is mainly to exalt Islam and its warriors, the end result cannot be credible. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 08:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello, then we should discuss to reform the article then, i also leave reply in the deletion discussion for revolving the matter. Ahendra (talk) 09:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ahendra. I wanted to let you know that I'm currently copy-editing the article Zubayr ibn al-Awwam per the request made at the Guild of Copy Editors. You might consider refraining from editing the page while I'm working so that our edits don't conflict with each other. I will be finished in the next few days. Thank you. Rublov (talk) 15:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sure, i'll refrain to give u guys space to work on it. thank you sire, hope the best for the improvements with copyediting. Ahendra (talk) 15:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed the copy-edit. I'd recommend taking a look at what I changed and removed, and trying to avoid the same kinds of things in the future. Rublov (talk) 01:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sure, thx for ur great help, i'll check it later. Ahendra (talk) 07:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i've checked, its better, thumbsup for ur great work bro. Ahendra (talk) 20:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amr ibn Ma'adi Yakrib, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malay.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fixed Ahendra (talk) 06:14, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, following the Zhang Ni modifications. Do you think It makes for a better and more comprehensive read to have one big section (biography)? IMO, wiki articles about people are obviously bios and should be cut into different sections about the most important moments of their life and sub sections for precisions. It also allows for more convenience from the "contents" box if you are looking for a specific event about this person's life. Your opinion? TheWayWeAllGo (talk) 19:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

good point, i have nothing to said otherwise, especially if the biographical info of certain person has many notable facets. Ahendra (talk) 23:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then why change the structure of the articles? For example, you seem to participate massively into the Amr ibn Ma'adi Yakrib page, I'm sure there is far enough info to cut his life into sections with subsections to highlight his most important feats. The same can be said for Wei Yan since you seem to want to make it a GA, I'm sure you could cut his life into different parts with some of his achievements highlighted into subsections such as the Hanzhong fortification and Ziwu plan. Again for me, Saladin's article is really well structured with 9 sections about his life with subsections to accentuate his most important moments rather than just a big section called "biography". But maybe It's me making too much out of this or just your personal preference? TheWayWeAllGo (talk) 13:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Anfal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spoils of War.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Evrenos has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rashidun cavalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Byzantines.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahendra! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 11:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello sire, sure i'll be more careful of its listing as minor edit or not in the future..Ahendra (talk) 12:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Himyarite Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Yule.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thx for ur help sire, i will see how the copy edit goes on. Ahendra (talk) 06:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that was a lot of work but I'm done now. I've moved all of the quotations from References into Notes. I've also marked the final two sections with {{Unreferenced}} because these are completely uncited. If you still think it's too long, maybe removing some of the minor points would help. There's a case for moving to a single citation system. Otherwise, I think it's fine. I didn't check for copyvios. Anyway, good luck with the article. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 02:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i see, i will check if it can be shortened further... good joob sire. Ahendra (talk) 04:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ahendra! A while ago you reviewed the Jama Masjid, Delhi article as C-class for the Islam Wikiproject. In your review I noticed that the one fail point for qualifying as B-class was 'Coverage and accuracy'. Most of the article in its current form is my contribution, so I'm familiar with the page content. Could you elaborate on your review so I could maybe rectify and work towards the B-class qualification? Gowhk8 (talk) 17:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi (talk), i i will check further, im sorry just replying now since im busy lately.. Ahendra (talk) 05:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi (talk) if you are confident about the cooverage of the Jama Masjid, Delhi and its reliabilities of its sources and style consistency of the article, i will help you to improve its status through WP:PR

best regards and keep good works Ahendra (talk) 12:18, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello can you help the article Battle of Jamal. the article, i.e. the reference is in stark contrast to Islamic sources. an example is in the article it is mentioned that Al Ahnaf ibn Qays is called the killer of Zubayr ibn al Awwam. even though the correct name of the murder was Amr ibn Jarmouz. Then Madelung considered the fictional story of Ali condemning the killer of Zubayr, while the story was mentioned in the books of Islamic scholars. Madelung also considers the fictional story of the negotiation agreement between Ali and Aisha. can you improve this article? I think there are users who are inciting to give false stories. Iylaq (talk) 09:16, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Iylaq... @Iylaqwithout looking there should be many references too dispute those claims... but unfortunately lately i am very busy, but i In Sha Allah will look at the future about it to fix this false claims

Ahendra (talk) 09:17, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Umayyad conquest of Sindh has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 14:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello @Diannaa. its fine for me if its reverted if my edit reverted due copyright rules. what if if i rewording and rephrasing it with my own words to avoid the copyrighted lines/words arrangements/phrases from the copyrighted material? Ahendra (talk) 12:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay to add content to Wikipedia that's completely written in your own words. Cite your sources. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 13:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes understood.. thx & cheers :) Ahendra (talk) 20:18, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi Ahendra. I apologize if there are wrong words or late replying to messages. A154 (talk) 14:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes of course sir.. no worry about that Ahendra (talk) 11:21, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Army of the Mughal Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal–Safavid War.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mongol invasions of India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zafar Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahmad Sirhindi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sharh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sure i will give my vote Ahendra (talk) 12:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello akhi! I have seen many of your great articles on Islamic history. Can you please make one on the Muslim conquest of Cyprus? Please just make a short article if you don't have time, I would be willing to improve and expand it as I can't create an article. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.191.146.126 (talk) 22:04, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salaam brother, i will try In Sha Allah here i added the paragraph about Cyprus during Rashidun era from Ubadah ibn al-Samit page--Ahendra (talk) 04:12, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Mir Jumla II. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   — Diannaa (talk) 21:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahendra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

hi @Diannaa:, why i have been blocked? as far as i know i didnt violating copyright. the edit which ive done in Mir Jumla II ive changed the words so it did not resemble original link reference Ahendra (talk) 21:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to demonstrate a better understanding of the copyright issues before we can consider unblocking you. Please describe in your own words what copyright is, what Wikipedia's copyright is, and when/how copyrighted content may be used on Wikipedia. WP:COPYVIO may help you with this. 331dot (talk) 08:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked for copying content from this book into Mir Jumla II. You can view the overlap using this tool. You have received at least eight previous warnings for violations of our copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 21:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: forgive me as i did not revamp that paragraph in Mir Jumla II page completely, since i did not thought it still resemble the original texts.

thanks for teach me the [tools] to detect the text copyright.

can i ask forgiveness for unblock permission? i promise i will use that tool in future to avoid my edits violating copyright like that Ahendra (talk) 22:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can't use that tool until the content has been added to the encyclopedia, at which point you would have already committed a copyright violation. — Diannaa (talk) 22:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: thats too bad.

anyway, i promise this will be the last time i did this kind of violation again. that mistake in Mir Jumla II's paragraph big mistake of me. next ill use my own sandbox first for such long edits to crosscheck any possible violations.

i will be grateful if my appeal being Approved Ahendra (talk) 22:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright content is not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia, not even in sandboxes or drafts. — Diannaa (talk) 23:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: okay noted, i understood Ahendra (talk) 05:38, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ahendra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

@331dot: well according to what i understand from what ive learnt from WP:COPYVIO is, Copyrights means is the rights of intellectual property of someone or some firm which we need to seek their permissions first before using the said property. While in term of Wikipedia's copyright, it means every texts published in Wikipedia articles by its contributors is copyrighted to the public use with proper attribution to the legal owner of the intellectual property content. as for when/how copyrighted content may be used on Wikipedia, it should be used and keep in minds for us every editors/contributors to Wikipedia article whenever we inserting and editing page, as every objects of copyrighted law such as texts, or Image, or Gif videos we submitted in our edit must be attributed to the copyright owners, while we should avoid the copyright infringements here in case of text using by using our own words describe the text from our sources. Ahendra (talk) 10:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Your answers show you now have an adequate understanding of how copyirhgt applies to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 15:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:

You have addressed me, but someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 12:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply Ahendra (talk) 16:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your answer to the first question is correct. Copyright is an intellectual property right, which means we cannot use someone else's prose or photos or other creative works without their permission.

Your answer to the second question is incorrect.

Your answer to the third question is partially correct – it's okay to use copyright content if properly attributed, and we avoid violating copyright by writing Wikipedia articles using our own words. Please elaborate by telling us the following:

• When is it okay to use copyright content?
• Is it okay to use large amounts of copyright content?
• When using copyright content, how do you provide proper attribution to the copyright holder? — Diannaa (talk) 13:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for late reply @Diannaa: for my answer is:

• When the copyright content is expired and became public domain use, as far as i know Berne Convention that the the content entered Public domain fair use in 70 years after the first publication. Alternatively copyrighted material Can be used without permission if we fairly use the copyrighted material in our works by attributing the copyright holder as original owner, and not copy paste the text, images, or any works as if its our own works
• It is not okay. its more preferred smaller and limited use of the copyrighted material for fair attribution only
• first is when our works is countaining the copyrighted content. second is we provide proper attribution by providing the title, author, dates, and as our works material source.

Ahendra (talk) 16:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The first answer is partly correct. Copyright expiry is different in different countries ands under different circumstances. See Commons:Hirtle chart to get an idea how complicated it is. Suppose you have confirmed that the copyright has expired on some prose, and you want to add it unaltered to an article. How would you notify our readers that the material is copied and that you did not write it yourself?
• Second question is answered correctly.
• The third answer is incorrect. Copying copyright material is not allowed, whether you cite your source or not. How would you indicate that the content was copied rather than your own work? — Diannaa (talk) 20:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Diannaa:

  • for first answer, in context of Wikipedia editing, we should only incorporate the expired prose, adding footnote... as example: "This article incorporates text from XXX, by Author XX(died in 50 years old), first publicized in United states 1904, now in the public domain for 70 years + Author's life, as per Commons:Hirtle chart about United states law"
  • seems this one is cleared
  • i think i misintepret this question at first. for copyrighted line of texts, i dont think it can be used. so we used our own words to avoid copyright violation of copy pasting the material.

  Ahendra (talk) 21:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These answers are adequate. I am now unblocking. Note we have some templates you can use for attribution. A common one is {{Source-attribution}} which you can include as part of your citation if you copy public domain content. Please be careful of copyright in the future. I will be monitoring you contributions. — Diannaa (talk) 15:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

many thank you for your understanding 🙏🏻 yes i will keep in mind with the source attributions and the copyrighted materials. @Diannaa: Ahendra (talk) 19:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mughal Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal war of succession.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is alright. the intention for that edit is to cover the entire:

• Mughal war of succession (1627–1628), after the death of emperor Nuruddin Salim Jahangir of the Mughal Empire
• Mughal war of succession (1658–1659), after grave illness of emperor Shah Jahan of the Mughal Empire
• Mughal war of succession (1707–1709), after the death of emperor Aurangzeb of the Mughal Empire
• Mughal war of succession (1712–1720), after the death of emperor Bahadur Shah I of the Mughal Empire

because if it written for each of conflict, the Infobox will be overbloated Ahendra (talk) 06:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 April, in this edit to Mughal Empire, you added a shortened footnote:

{{sfn|Streusand|2002|p=218}}

without defining its target. Perhaps you meant something written by Douglas E. Streusand, who is active in the field? But I can't find any book, journal article, or conference paper of his from 2002. He did publish a chapter in a book edited by Sam J. Tangredi that year, but it isn't anywhere near page 218. Please add the missing bibliographic information to resolve the "no target" error, or remove the citation. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello.. ah yes, i meant its Douglas Streusand. pardon for my bad not clarifying it before. and thank you for your correction Ahendra (talk) 09:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

here i completed the citation, since it is from Streusand's 2018 edition.... Ahendra (talk) 09:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I wanted to take the time to explain the reasons for the reverts in greater detail here, and enable responses by writing on the talkpage. I apprecaite your efforts to improve Islam-related articles. However, I noticed that some edits on Angels in Islam, Zabaniyya, and Beast of the Earth might not comply to the WP:OR and WP:N. Please make sure that the additions are verified by reliable sources. Furthermore, if the citations consists of larger texts, it might be helpful to provide a translation as it was done with German sources on jinn.

with best regards VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 17:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sure, if need to revamp the references i could provide referenced sources from BinBaz official foundation, King Saud University, Islamic University of Madina, or Ministry of Religious Affairs (Indonesia) and Ministry of Islamic Affairs, Dawah, and Guidance. i believe it should to be authority for non WP:OR or WP:N Ahendra (talk) 17:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in this edit to Tōdō Takatora you introduced a reference {{Sfn|藤田|Tatsuo|p=29}}, but there does not appear to be a work associated with it. This means nobody can look the reference up, and the article is added to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could fix it that would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 15:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello Duncan, yes thank you for the heads up.. i will try to fix it Ahendra (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mizuno Katsushige, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fushimi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Ahendra. I am here to notify that your recent additions to Kobayakawa Takakage had lead to CITEREF errors due to a missing bibliography. Please add a bibliography/work cited section to the article with the following books: " Stephen Turnbull (2003)", "川口 2009", "Kuwata Kazuaki (2016)". This can help with verifiability of the article and can improve readership. Thank you, Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 02:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello @Cowboygilbert... thanks for the heads up! im gonna check it and try to fix it asap. its mainly materials from Tachibana Dōsetsu Ahendra (talk) 04:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Sekigahara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fukui.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kantō region, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yahagi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you firstly for your edits to Sekigahara Campaign, which I can see you've done an awful lot for in quite a short space of time.

I wanted to query one source regarding actions at Gifu Castle, specifically regarding an attempt to reinforce the castle which was repulsed by a certain Tanaka Yoshimasa. The citation you provided for this was:

Mori Rintarō (1991). A. Dilworth, David; Thomas Rimer, J. (eds.). The historical fiction of Mori Ōgai. University of Hawaii Press. p. 345. ISBN 9780824813666. Retrieved 21 May 2024.

As this stands, the citation implies that the source is a work of historical fiction rather than attesting to the event as historical in itself. Would you be able to confirm whether the work in question makes claim to the historicity of the event (e.g. in a foreword or preface discussing historical events forming the basis of the fiction), perhaps with in-text quotes? Benjitheijneb (talk) 17:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the notice. there is two things i need to explain.

1. i taken most of that edits from Sekigahara battle background

2. for Line 79 ⟶ 103: its all my addition for the references, from Tetsuo Owada, history of Onishi city, Fujii Jizaemon, Gifu prefecture history department, Memorandum of Ōshige Heiroku and Mitsutoshi Takayanagi... except that one the historical fiction of Mori Ogai. thats already been there before my edits. i just didnt check it yet.

so after rereading the context of that one line with Mori Ogai references, i also though its dubious. i didnt even can check page 345 of that book. i guess we should remove them from both page Ahendra (talk) 18:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! – Daℤyzzos (✉️ • 📤) 20:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. yes im sorry. i will try to fill the reasons on the summary field for that Ahendra (talk) 20:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! – Daℤyzzos (✉️ • 📤) 20:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias XD 🤝 Ahendra (talk) 20:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thuggee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thug.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Mali Empire, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 20:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello @Kowal2701 its been around 5 years im not following up with Mali empire.. i need to backtracks many development regarding their history again.. but yes, i will try to help your task force Ahendra (talk) 13:08, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Army of the Mughal Empire

added a link pointing to Pioneer

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Army of the Mughal Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pioneer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Signs of the coming of Judgement Day, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from posting disputed content on Wikipedia, as you did at Kalam. Your edits appear to be disruptive for not following Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result into getting banned. Thank you. Ayaltimo (talk) 04:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all of your work on the articles regarding the Sengoku time period. I noticed you added "This means Tadatsugu was given command of the "Higashi-Mikawa" or "Western Mikawa" samurai clans" at Sakai Tadatsugu and similar information on the Tokugawa Ieyasu page as well. I am changing these sentences to correct the directions (Higashi meaning eastern and nishi western) but if there was some information I missed in the source I'd appreciate the corrections. Moritoriko (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:War Elephant Tusk Sword (Mughal Empire).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]