Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the discussion at WT:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Status field for Amusement Park infoboxes. Thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Can you please to not undo the note about pages merge here 2022 boycott of Russia and Belarus. I'm trying to de-dup and merge two almost identical contents and contributors still updating both pages. Any other suggestions?

Thanks DmitryShpak (talk) 19:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DmitryShpak. The note at the top of the page is not a proper way to notify contributors/viewers of an article, thus the reason why I hide the note. However, I have added the template Template:In use to the article as it conveys the message better and more "officially". If you need to, I also suggest adding Template:Under construction when editing is not taking place. Adog (Talk・Cont) 00:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, if there are edits that are disruptive, might I suggest making a formal request to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection about semi-protection on the article in question. Adog (Talk・Cont) 00:10, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. DmitryShpak (talk) 06:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for opening the ANI on that IP. We gave them every chance... Meters (talk) 20:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All good. At the end of the day, all we can do is try. I am sure they can write a great off-wiki blog about their home park, they have a passion that is for sure. I would like to thank ya'll individually for keeping cool too. The belittling-other-editors-about-their-knowledge comments was the precipitating pet-peeve. I know someone would have filed a notice or pinged an admin anyhow. Adog (Talk・Cont) 23:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And now they have lost access to their own talk page too. Meters (talk) 04:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also figures, bound to happen. Adog (Talk・Cont) 13:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Iron Gwazi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 06:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Iron Gwazi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Iron Gwazi for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 10:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Iron Gwazi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Iron Gwazi for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 17:41, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iron Gwazi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that it took seven years for Gwazi, a pair of dueling wooden roller coasters, to be refurbished into the hybrid roller coaster Iron Gwazi? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iron Gwazi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Iron Gwazi), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tigris (roller coaster) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 01:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tigris (roller coaster) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tigris (roller coaster) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 02:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tigris (roller coaster) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tigris (roller coaster) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 20:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cheetah Hunt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 20:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cheetah Hunt you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cheetah Hunt for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 21:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cheetah Hunt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cheetah Hunt for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tigris (roller coaster), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the design of the train for the roller coaster Tigris was revealed in the form of a cake? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tigris (roller coaster). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tigris (roller coaster)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde 12:04, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cheetah Hunt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the design of Cheetah Hunt (pictured) was inspired by a Star Wars film? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cheetah Hunt. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cheetah Hunt), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 9,170 views (764.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 05:33, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jolly Rancher Remix, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that riders on the Jolly Rancher Remix can smell one of five randomly chosen Jolly Rancher flavors? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jolly Rancher Remix. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jolly Rancher Remix), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde 00:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 10,075 views (419.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:20, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roller Soaker you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ZKang123 -- ZKang123 (talk) 10:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Roller Soaker you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Roller Soaker for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ZKang123 -- ZKang123 (talk) 12:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Roller Soaker you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Roller Soaker for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ZKang123 -- ZKang123 (talk) 04:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you reviewed my one or two-sentence user page. There's not much there, but I figured someone would review it soon. I'm still pretty new, but I was stalking the help desks for a while as an IP, and finally got an account name. Thanks. David10244 (talk) 01:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David10244: Well welcome, thank you, and no problem. I use my New Page Patrol rights irregularly to patrol user and talk pages when I am link hopping around the Wiki. My user page started off the same some time ago and went through several iterations before I stuck to a less-messier and semi-professional looking style. Lots to do and see here. Jump into whatever feels right, even if it results in a wet trout being thrown your way. Nothing is unusual, usually. Adog (Talk・Cont) 03:24, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm hoping to put off being trouted for as long as possible... David10244 (talk) 07:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You "unusual" link led me to notice that Stone Mountain, Georgia is not in the list of tautological place names. I used to live in Atlanta, and the name "Stone Mountain" always seemed as dumb as if there was a "Water Lake" near it. David10244 (talk) 07:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David10244: I am sure it could be added. A great mountain to hike up. Weird for its topography, considering the seemingly flat lands around it. Adog (Talk・Cont) 17:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Roller Soaker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that riding on the Roller Soaker was described as going through a "car wash with the top down"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Roller Soaker. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Roller Soaker), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 8,949 views (745.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 03:31, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Great Bear (roller coaster) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 22:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Loch Ness Monster (roller coaster) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Newtothisedit -- Newtothisedit (talk) 03:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Loch Ness Monster (roller coaster) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Loch Ness Monster (roller coaster) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Newtothisedit -- Newtothisedit (talk) 18:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Loch Ness Monster (roller coaster), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that there is a Loch Ness Monster in Williamsburg, Virginia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Loch Ness Monster (roller coaster). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Loch Ness Monster (roller coaster)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Great Bear (roller coaster) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Great Bear (roller coaster) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Great Bear (roller coaster) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Great Bear (roller coaster) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

roller coasters with a smile

Thank you for quality articles around roller coasters such as Great Bear (roller coaster), Tigris (roller coaster) and Time Traveler (roller coaster), for the timeline of St. Petersburg, Florida, for nice reviewing and a wow user page, - user enjoying the life on Tampa Bay with a smile, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2774 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:11, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Honestly, I did not think I would wake up to this kind of punishment, haha. That said, I do very much appreciate and accept this Precious kindly. I will make sure to keep it safe. If you would like to throw a cod my way at any point, I will humbly accept that as well. Again, I do apologize for the inconvenience around the review. Hopefully I will see you around and give you a better review on the DYK board! :D Adog (Talk・Cont) 14:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You got what you asked for. As this is my busiest time of year (I leave for the IAAPA Expo in five days) I don't have time to go through this. I did find some edits that introduced errors and made a few changes. You will probably need to give this a thorough review once the GOCE is done with it.—JlACEer (talk) 03:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JlACEer: No problemo. I appreciate you taking a glance at it before your trip, and will do a comb over once the edits are complete. I do plan on nominating the article in the near future for WP:FAC, so do tell if any further corrections should be made and will be happy to fix (of course, given available time)! I hope the trip is productive and this year's additions are thrilling. Adog (Talk・Cont) 03:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SooperDooperLooper you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Newtothisedit -- Newtothisedit (talk) 02:40, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article SooperDooperLooper you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SooperDooperLooper for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Newtothisedit -- Newtothisedit (talk) 04:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Great Bear (roller coaster), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the roller coaster Great Bear is named after the constellation Ursa Major? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Great Bear (roller coaster). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Great Bear (roller coaster)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SooperDooperLooper, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the name of the SooperDooperLooper was picked when a Hershey executive was outvoted by his wife and children? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SooperDooperLooper. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SooperDooperLooper), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 12,938 views (539.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 04:07, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Adog. Your input is requested at WikiProject Amusement Parks, as there is a discussion about the reliability of some sources which can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Reliable source discussion. Thank you!

Note: You recieved this notification because you are listed as a participant for WikiProject Amusement Parks.

Harobouri ^{T • C (he/him)} 16:33, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jolly Rancher Remix you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 08:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jolly Rancher Remix you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jolly Rancher Remix and Talk:Jolly Rancher Remix/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 08:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jolly Rancher Remix you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jolly Rancher Remix for comments about the article, and Talk:Jolly Rancher Remix/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
• Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
• FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
• TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
• Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.

The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included LunaEatsTuna, Thebiguglyalien, Sammi Brie, Trainsandotherthings, Lee Vilenski, Juxlos, Unexpectedlydian, SounderBruce, Kosack, BennyOnTheLoose and PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Flight Deck (California's Great America) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Flight Deck (California's Great America) and Talk:Flight Deck (California's Great America)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Flight Deck (California's Great America) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Flight Deck (California's Great America) for comments about the article, and Talk:Flight Deck (California's Great America)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article New Mexico Rattler you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:New Mexico Rattler and Talk:New Mexico Rattler/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 01:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article New Mexico Rattler you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:New Mexico Rattler for comments about the article, and Talk:New Mexico Rattler/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 22:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Citation Barnstar
		For your work on improving the references in Iron Gwazi, a task too often neglected or done perfunctorily. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: Hey! Thank you kindly, this is my first Barnstar so it is much appreciated. A good surprise coming back from vacation. Hope you are doing well! Adog (Talk・Cont) 14:57, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Flight Deck (California's Great America), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a man dropped his hat while riding Flight Deck and went to retrieve it, but ended up dying after being struck by the foot of a rider? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Flight Deck (California's Great America). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Flight Deck (California's Great America)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:

• Iazyges (1040) with three FAs on Byzantine emperors, and lots of bonus points.
• Unlimitedlead (847), with three FAs on ancient history, one GA and nine reviews.
• Epicgenius (636), a WikiCup veteran, with one FA on the New Amsterdam Theatre, four GAs and eleven DYKs
• BennyOnTheLoose (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on snooker, six GAs and seven reviews.
• FrB.TG (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga song and a mass of bonus points.

Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, MyCatIsAChonk, PCN02WPS, and AirshipJungleman29.

So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick side note that I noticed you removed "early" from "early 2021". Totally fine if you're OK with that, but the point I was making is that when you have the month and year, then terms like "early" and "late" aren't needed. In other words, it would be just fine to say "early 2021" or "March 2021", just not something combined like "early March 2021" unless another event is describe in "late March 2021". Hope that makes sense! --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GoneIn60: 10-4, I figured I delete that instance to address WP:RECENT a tad made by another user. In retrospect, I am not sure how useful that might be for a reader to know Iron Gwazi's opening date did not occur in early 2021, since it would open anyhow in 2022 with no further pushback in the same year. Let me know what you think. Open to either its inclusion or exclusion. Appreciate the comments so far and the message! Adog (Talk・Cont) 16:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI in case you weren't already aware, you can ping the FAC coordinators if needed to perform the necessary spot checks, which might be a good idea after receiving support from Epicgenius (assuming that happens). Instructions on how to ping are at WP:FAC. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GoneIn60: Thank you. I was not sure whether I had to wait for someone to come by and review them. Will do that after a (hopeful) Epicgenius' or others consideration that may hop on before that time. I appreciate your help and guidance as well, haha! Adog (Talk・Cont) 15:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, no prob! I was looking at another FAC review and saw the nominator do that after a month went by and receiving support from several reviewers. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropping a quick note that I made a few more changes that hopefully you are ok with. Another thing I noticed is that the lead length has increased from 338 words, 16 sentences to about 360 words, 17 sentences. Per MOS:LEADLENGTH, it should be right in the middle of 2-3 paragraphs, and the guideline notes that most FA leads are about 300 words, 10-15 sentences. Seems like it is trending in the wrong direction. Do you see any other opportunities to trim it just a tad? If not, I'm sure it will be fine either way, but just a thought! --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some ideas:

• "Busch Gardens announced the construction of Gwazi in July 1998, with construction initiating the same day" – maybe cut-out the last part, since the "day" is not being specified here, or find another way to shorten?
• "In 2018, the park indicated it would refurbish the wooden structure, with site preparation taking place in late 2018 and preliminary work starting in early 2019." – Perhaps just say, "In 2018, the park settled on a refurbishment of the wooden structure commencing after the 2018 season" or something similar? Specific details would still exist in the body.
• "The refurbished ride was marketed and opened as North America's tallest, steepest, and fastest hybrid roller coaster. The steel-track hybrid coaster is 206 feet (63 m) high, features a maximum speed of 76 mph (122 km/h), and received a track length increase of 567 feet (173 m) over its predecessor." – Could combine into one sentence. Maybe something like, "The refurbished ride was marketed as North America's tallest, steepest, and fastest hybrid roller coaster, featuring a height of 206 feet (63 m), a maximum speed of 76 mph (122 km/h), and a track length increase of 567 feet (173 m) over its predecessor."

If all 3 changes were made, overall length would drop to 339 words and 16 sentences. Again, totally fine if you are opposed to any of these. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GoneIn60: Good suggestions. Cut some words and took the suggestions from above. Lead is down to 341 words. Of course, the last paragraph is a little heavier, but that would be necessary anyhow because it is the main subject. Thank you for acting on it. Hopefully looks a bit better. Adog (Talk・Cont) 15:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great! And by my count, the current version is down to 330 words, 16 sentences! Awesome! --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, awesome. Adog (Talk・Cont) 15:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your recent revert at Fury 325, but I was actually already in the process of adding another source. Looks like my edit overrode yours. Since the NYT actually pointed out that the report came from a bystander, it's probably relevant enough to mention it on Wikipedia. Just my 2¢, but feel free to take it to the talk page if you'd like to discuss further. Thanks! -- GoneIn60 (talk) 02:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GoneIn60: I agree with your revision. Looking at more sources now that are covering it from the bystander's perspective. So long as it isn't too detailed, that should suffice as opposed to some of the edits that have been going through the past 48-72 hours. I may have jumped the gun on that one. Adog (Talk・Cont) 02:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• Thebiguglyalien, with 919 points from a featured article on Frances Cleveland as well as five good articles and many reviews,
• Unlimitedlead, with 862 points from a high-scoring featured articles on Henry II of England and numerous reviews,
• Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.

Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Adog! The article you nominated, Iron Gwazi, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on a great accomplishment. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hawkeye7: Thank you, it is much appreciated! :) Adog (Talk・Cont) 12:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adog. You have new messages at Prodraxis's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 22:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bilorv: Thank you! Adog (Talk・Cont) 19:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rampage (roller coaster) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rjjiii -- Rjjiii (talk) 06:03, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rampage (roller coaster) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rampage (roller coaster) for comments about the article, and Talk:Rampage (roller coaster)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rjjiii -- Rjjiii (talk) 01:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elturo Ryan is one of the best sources of information he has a lot of insider information Thewriter806 (talk) 13:21, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Thewriter806: Hey, how is it going. Unfortunately I cannot for three important issues: YouTube content is generally unreliable, it has potential copyright issues, and should follow the narrow standard for inclusion, if proper. ElToroRyan does not fit the latter, as he deals with a lot of rumor and speculation, which is not allowed. He does provide convincing original analysis, but it cannot be verified by others (or from established secondary sources) as you would see in a traditional news publication where an article's content is vetted. Furthermore, if he does provide useful insight, it generally is mixed in with commentary which can skew reliability. I do like his content. He is the only enthusiast channel I follow. However, for Wikipedia's sake, he and any other enthusiast channels are generally unreliable.

If you are interested in amusement parks and attractions, consider joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Amusement Parks (WP:APARKS). We help in improving content for amusement parks, attractions, roller coasters, manufacturers, etc. Mostly things amusement. We have discussions on the reliability of enthusiast sources/publications if you care to take a look. I also have a source list in my sandbox you can look over, where the discussions are summarized. It is not part of WP:APARKS yet, but there is starting consensus to post this to the WikiProject to help new user's with knowing which sources we can use and should avoid. :) Adog (Talk・Cont) 16:50, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

DanCherek (talk) 22:33, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rampage (roller coaster), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rampage was said to cause "an adrenaline-induced tingle"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rampage (roller coaster). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rampage (roller coaster)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 12:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Adog, congrats on getting the TFA approved! These are typically copyedited and modified prior to the actual date it's posted, so I went ahead and made some changes. Please review them at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 25, 2023, and feel free to modify further or undo any that you disagree with. Thanks! --GoneIn60 (talk) 07:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GoneIn60: I appreciate it! I like how you edited the sentence structures; it looks a lot nicer now. I did some edits myself if you want to check them out for grammar and flow; made a small correction if that is good! Adog (Talk・Cont) 13:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even better now! Looks great to me! Glad WP:APARKS finally got another FA, congrats again! --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GoneIn60: As always, I appreciate the guidance and help! Adog (Talk・Cont) 18:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September songs

my story today

Thank you today for the article, with the possibly longest FAC introduction in history: "Can you believe one of the world's most recently acclaimed roller coasters is located in the wetlands and jungles of Tampa, Florida? That is a bit of a stretch, but the attraction's history is fascinating. Before my parents were born, Anheuser-Busch (A-B) built a brewery in Tampa, which opened in 1959. To stand out, August Busch Jr. also built landscaped gardens that opened with the brewery to attract community members. The park was such a hit that it began to add more; years and decades passed, transforming the simple brewery and gardens into a fully functional theme park: Busch Gardens Tampa. In time, A-B built more significant and better breweries, making its Tampa plant obsolete. - As part of an ever-innovating industry, the owners closed and demolished the brewery, building two dueling wooden roller coasters in its place, Gwazi. ... A roller coaster manufacturer business prominently emerged when it sat dormant, transforming old wooden roller coasters into steel behemoths. Rocky Mountain Construction (RMC) began giving life to expired wooden roller coasters, who were soon hired by SeaWorld Entertainment to revive Gwazi. RMC re-used portions of both dueling track support structures and concrete footings to create a single roller coaster. Once having a reputation for two rough, uncomfortable rides became a smooth, fast-paced, and thrilling steel-track roller coaster, Iron Gwazi. ... The roller coaster went on to be voted as the best new roller coaster for 2022 in Amusement Todays Golden Ticket Awards, one of the highest achieving awards in the amusement industry."! - Enjoy your first TFA, - I hope it's a smooth ride! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, thank you @Gerda Arendt. What a lovely September song with photos! Hopefully that was a wonderful trip! I will make sure to read today's story as well.

I was a tad embarrassed at myself once I realized FAC intros were not usually that long. Whoops. I am super excited nonetheless. I told some of my family and friends about the article. Hopefully there will be many more rides for readers into the future. :D Adog (Talk・Cont) 13:47, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

• Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
• Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
• Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)

		The Good Article Reviewer's Medal of Merit
		We really appreciate that you reviewed 30 GANs during the drive. Due in part to your efforts, the backlog of unreviewed nominations was reduced by 440 articles, an astonishing 69 percent.

(t · c) buidhe 07:15, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe: And thank you for your work as a coordinator! Lots of fun and learning opportunities. Adog (Talk・Cont) 12:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gleetus left a very vile message on own Talk page after being blocked. I deleted it and added "Tsk, tsk." Cullen subsequently blocked Talk page access, so that should be the end of hearing from Gleetus. David notMD (talk) 03:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: Sounds about right for a WP:NOTHERE user. Adog (Talk・Cont) 11:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I want to ask; do you do GAN review requests? If so, can you review my nomination for Australian rock band AC/DC? It's my first nomination, and I would like for you to review it. Thanks! — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 04:14, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vaughan J.: Hello there, thank you for reaching out. I want to say maybe, mainly because it is a large, it is a level 5 article, and I do not have much expertise in music/bands outside of listening to my own favorite songs (this weeks jam) and reading a bit up on Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs guidelines I did for the GAN Drive. I would consider dropping a comment to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject AC/DC, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rock music, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Metal, or Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board as there may be a more avid or experienced user in the songs genre of Wikipedia article content contribution that may be of service more than I. :) Adog (Talk・Cont) 12:39, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Featured Article Medal
		When Iron Gwazi was promoted to FA I was so busy enjoying the cookies you sent that I overlooked giving you the traditional first FAC success barnstar. But, better late than never, here you go. By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 15:49, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Hopefully those cookies were not too filling! Thank you Gog the Mild kindly for the medal and the assistance with Iron Gwazi's FAC! It is an honor, and I did not know this was a medal to be had. Unfortunately, life has been busy anyhow, but I am eager to get back to editing once this WikiOgre/old dog has some energy. As always, keep up the amazing work you are personally doing at FA! I hope to see you back there when I can get another article up and running. Hope you are doing well, all the best. Adog (Talk・Cont) 01:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to have worked them off. Hopefully you will be back at FAC sooner rather than later, it could do with more nominators of your capabilities. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:30, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

Joining the admiration for your first FA! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Thank you for the anniversary reminder and commendation! It is greatly appreciated! I was surprised that six years might have flown by this quickly, but alas, it has been one! Although, six is a great number. Adog (Talk・Cont) 22:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-

• BeanieFan11 with 2582 points
• Thebiguglyalien with 1615 points
• Epicgenius with 1518 points
• MyCatIsAChonk with 1012 points
• BennyOnTheLoose with 974 points
• AirshipJungleman29 with 673 points
• Sammi Brie with 520 points
• Unlimitedlead with 5 points

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

• Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
• MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
• Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
• MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
• BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
• Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
• LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
• MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
• Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
• Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.

The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), and Frostly (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
• Vami_IV (submissions), with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
• MaranoFan (submissions), with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
• Skyshifter (submissions), with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;
• Sammi Brie (submissions), with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
• voorts (submissions) and Elli (submissions), both with one FA and one DYK each.

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

• Generalissima (submissions), who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews
• Vami_IV (submissions), who has 790 points from two FAs on Felix M. Warburg House and Doom (2016 video game), two GAs, one DYK, and 11 reviews
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who has 580 points from one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, two DYKs, and five reviews
• Sammi Brie (submissions), who has 420 points mostly from nine GAs and seven DYKs on television and radio stations
• MaranoFan (submissions), who has 351 points from one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and three DYKs
• Skyshifter (submissions), who has 345 points from one FA on OneShot, one DYK and two reviews

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Busch Gardens Tampa Bay logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
• voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
• SounderBruce (submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
• Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
• Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
• SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
• BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
• voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
• Skyshifter (submissions) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
• AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,150 points, mostly from 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 7 good articles, and 13 did you know nominations;
• Arconning (submissions) with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews;
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on Genghis Khan and 2 good articles; and
• BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Susanna Hoffs, 2 featured lists, and 3 good articles.

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

woof bark woof woof bark pant woof pant pant pant woof bark pant HurricaneKirk2024 (talk) 05:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HurricaneKirk2024 🤨. Adog (Talk・Cont) 14:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry for the jokes here. I just saw your username and thought it would be funny to act like a dog. 🍋 🍋(talk!) 18:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LemonJuiceIsSour You are good, lol. You will not see me bark back though. Adog (Talk・Cont) 18:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so. 🍋 🍋(talk!) 18:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LemonJuiceIsSour I know half a second ago I said I would not, but I did at my latest talk page message at the bottom. Adog (Talk・Cont) 18:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw. 🍋 🍋(talk!) 18:22, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

• Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
• MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
• Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
• Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
• Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:19, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gerda Arendt! Hoping to be more active again, hoping all those I worked with already are doing well and still keeping Wikipedia active. Adog (Talk・Cont) 14:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Adog but I believe there to have been a misunderstanding as New Atlantis is an official micronation flag and I found the flag on the Wikipedia commons. There are two Micronations claiming to be called New Atlantis However one is outdated and no longer exists. NewAtlantisofficalgovernment (talk) 16:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NewAtlantisofficalgovernment: I know I said I would not talk back like a dog above, but woof. Micronations, like any Wikipedia article, need to be notable to warrant their place on the encyclopedia, even if that means just an image on a list of micronation flags. Wikipedia is not a repository of media nor a web-hosting site for people's personal usage. Whether you are acting on behalf of New Atlantis (micronation) or another, there appears to be a clear conflict of interest. A look at the username and inclusion in the edit history does not bode of constructive edits. Please do edit constructively with multiple, reliable sources if you think New Atlantis could warrant inclusion. Adog (Talk・Cont) 18:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand however our government did not add that flag to the Wikipedia commons so someone outside of New Atlantis must have heard of us and added it. We do also believe that this message was constructive as it is adding to the list of official. NewAtlantisofficalgovernment (talk) 19:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to ask how would we be eligible for a warrant? NewAtlantisofficalgovernment (talk) 19:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to ask how would we be eligible for a warrant? NewAtlantisofficalgovernment (talk) 19:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NewAtlantisofficalgovernment...it is probably best not to engage with the article you were editing because, again, conflict of interest and what I described with Wikipedia not being a repository of media, a personal web-hosting site, or possibly a place for self-promotion.

From what I know, the Flags of micronations article only includes flags of 'micronations' with established, linkable Wikipedia articles. That means that your country's micronation needs to have establish notability to warrant it's own article. Please read through the links in my first response. Also, please do NOT make a Wikipedia article about your micronation, I think that is self-explanatory...even if it was in good faith the COI is a problem assuming there are independent, multiple, reliable sources out there...Adog (Talk・Cont) 20:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So is the page yours? NewAtlantisofficalgovernment (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NewAtlantisofficalgovernment -- Nope, but I can reasonably guide you to not edit that article though because of the policies I described above and from what I have seen historically. I won't make further edits if you decide to edit the article about your own micronation, but I can confidently say another editor will eventually remove the flag/content again given my explanation. Adog (Talk・Cont) 20:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adog, just recently you removed some information I wrote on the Kingda Ka page regarding its soundtrack due to my lack of source. However, this information was all from my own observation inside the park. Is there anyway I can post that info with the source being my own observation? Or do I have to find one that backs me up? Jdavis2372 (talk) 19:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jdavis2372. This is a good question. Unfortunately, although we may know things to be true either through observation or otherwise, we do have to provide reliable sources so that others can verify our edits. This falls under the purview of original research. I have had a tough time with this in the past because I would know things to be true about articles I was editing but could not include the content due to its lack of reliable sources (online or physical). Sometimes, there is good reason for content exclusion as it could just be a niche fact that only a small population would find interesting. We do have to write articles that would appeal to wider audiences unless you believe the facts inclusion would be beneficial to contextualize the subject.

I can speak to one example that you may find useful. In Iron Gwazi's FAC, I used a queue sign as a fact in the article. Normally, this would warrant exclusion because it is not cited anywhere online or in books and is not easily verifiable to others unless you walked into the Iron Gwazi queue and looked up at the fact board. However, I took a picture and video of the board to prove to others of its existence, the board aided in supporting other facts in the article that were important on the discussion of the roller coaster's construction materials, and I explained how the board could be useful using WP:ABOUTSELF, a verifiability provision, to other editors.

In all. If multiple reliable sources cite a fact, it may warrant inclusion. If there are not a lot of citations about a fact, evaluate the statements importance for inclusion. If there are no reliable facts outside of personal observation it is best to not include that information (but do keep it in mind if a source states something later down the road). Adog (Talk・Cont) 20:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I'm an amusement park/roller coaster lover and I've been working on various articles about them. This project in particular, Operation B&M, has seemingly been abandoned for about a decade now and I'd like to rescue it. I'm finding active users (particularly those with interests in park/coaster articles) who may be interested in helping out. (I noticed your name on the old page too!) No worries if you aren't interested! Therguy10 (talk) 15:50, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Therguy10: I would be interested, but alas I do not know when I would be totally active again. :( Since getting Iron Gwazi to FA, I started a full-time job and recently got accepted into graduate school. I will try to edit here and there, but may not be the most reliable. Good to see enthusiasts still growing on the Wiki! Adog (Talk・Cont) 01:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, that's awesome! I've gathered a solid group of editors and am hoping to get a few more before officially restarting the project. But I'm so glad to here you're interested! Even if you can't make edits very frequently at all, I'll still keep you in mind very much and let you know once everything is up and running! Therguy10 (talk) 14:09, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Therguy10: Thank you! I can see what I can contribute if possible. I will have to return at some point since I did have ambitions for revamping the look of WP:APARKS with Gonein60, but have not completed it. Adog (Talk・Cont) 14:02, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Woah, reviving APARKS is actually on my to-do list, so I'm very happy to hear that!

(I have previously reached out to Gone about OPB&M but didn't get a response, so if you hear from him feel free to invite him as well)

Thanks again! Therguy10 (talk) 14:15, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]