Welcome!

Hello, Adamiow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --kingboyk 18:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you explain why the page relating to Adam Morris (The General E) has been deleted. As far as I can tell, the criteria was related to a being a musician, and he is not, instead being a DJ on a radio station in London. Cheers. Adamiow 18:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It's not just notability. The article wasn't encyclopedic. It read like a piece from a directory or a fan site. If you started again on a temporary page in your userspace and made it read like an encyclopedia article, with references, you may well be able to persuade people that we should have an article on him. --kingboyk 18:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC) (some of the links in the message above may help)[reply]

Replied at User_talk:Kingboyk#Adam_Morris_.28The_General_E.29 --kingboyk 18:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:AdamMorris.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. wangi 19:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Morris. For information on the process see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks/wangi 21:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:AllanLake.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. wangi 21:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have tagged the above named image. I am unsure how to tag it. I have obtained the image from the subject, with their permission and it is their picture. What tag do I use? Thanks. Adamiow 21:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It all depends really. Was the release with the understanding the photo would be used on Wikipedia only and for no commercial use. Or was it a complete release (to a free licence), allowing other site to use the image as well? Such a low-resolution photo has limited use, can you get a higher-res version? Thanks/wangi 22:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was just for Wikipedia use. Unfortunately, no other version is available. Any ideas? Cheers. Adamiow 22:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately we cannot accept images that are for "Wikipedia only". We need to get an image under a free licence (see WP:IUP). In the past editors would have agrued "fair use" of a non-free image, but that's no longer the case (since there's no reason why anyone with a camera cannot take a free-licence photo). Thanks/wangi 22:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have just remembered that the that the image has been used elsewhere, other than just for Wikipedia, still not for commercial use. Sorry, I didn't have enough time to think about it last night. What tag should I use? Cheers. Adamiow 12:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that doesn't make a difference - Wikipedia needs the "for commercial use" permission so we are free to use the image in derivatives. Surely, someone has a free image they have taken? Thanks/wangi 21:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very confused with all of this. My apologies, as I have struggled to understand this before. I have been given permission to use this photo in any way I wished. I have used this photo on here, as well as it being used on a website in reference to the person. As this gains money through ads, would this count as a commercial activity? If it does, then what tag shall I use? If not, I have another photo, which has been used as a publicity photo on a website for a radio station, which could be used, but I think this photo is more suited. Thanks. Adamiow 22:22, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afraid I don't have the time just now to explain it fully, packing for a business trip to the States... I recommend you summarise this discussion (or just post a pointer to it) at Wikipedia:Village pump (assistance) and hopefully someone will help you out. Thanks/wangi 22:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Core digital.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the info. Wasn't aware of that but i will take note for any future updates. Thanks again Newtree21 (talk) 18:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Galaxy South Coast Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Three times now myself and another editor have removed this non-free media file from your development page. Per WP:NFCC #9, the use of non-free images are not permitted outside of the main article namespace, even on development articles. Please do not restore the image again. If you have questions about this, please ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 23:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I like the new list of past and present characters, its worked well! Well done, :) — M.Mario (T/C) 13:49, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, look no one really watches Doctors. At the moment, I have been trying to update the 2012 characters by the DS spoilers or the small clip on the BBC websites. It's not really working, you can see by the 2012 list Others section. Now, I am trying to split characters which have appeared in 3+ episodes into sections on the list, and I was thinking about deleting the Others table completley. Then we just have the main characters for the year, we dont have loads of empty boxes and no one needs to watch the episodes frequently. Instead of having the Others section, I am creating this here, which I think is a much better way of keeping up to date whether characters are returning, and it will have a list with all the characters on from all the years, the actors on, the dates, but just not the storylines. I think this is a better solution, and am happy to carry it on unless you or anyone says no. However, I may have to split the list into List of Doctors cast members (A-D), etc, if there are two many actors which have appeared on the show. — M.Mario (T/C) 19:47, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I do actually watch the show when I can. Whilst the show's pages doesn't have that many active editors that work, it all seems to work ok. Secondly, I admire your efforts on trying to get all of the characters, but it seems like a huge job! Personally, I would concentrate on the big name guests and those in 1+ episodes. This would dramatically reduce the level of work. Whilst other soaps may cover all of the guests, due to the story of the day nature to Doctors, there are at least 2 new characters, each day, 200 days a year - that's a heck of a lot of characters! I think your list on your sandbox is rather complex and again, very time consuming. Overall, I think the best way forward is present characters on 1 page, split between regular and recurring, with a future and returning characters section. Secondly, a past list, again split between regular and recurring, and finally, the year pages for characters introduced in each year. It seems to work for the other soaps, so I can't see any reason to change. What do you think? Adamiow (talk) 12:24, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should not have the Others section on any of the articles, there are just too many, and not enough sources. For characters which appear more, we can make them a section on the list. I just think it will be a lot less time consuming and look neater if we do it this way. Second;y. the page is just a list of the cast members much like other soaps have, but a bit neater. Even though it is time consuming, Im very happy to continue with it. "Big name guests" is also a bit OR. The articles seem fine at the moment, I just think we should get rid of the Others, and put the major characters of 2012 in a section. Is that okay? — M.Mario (T/C) 15:55, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So that I can understand what you are proposing, how would you expect the 2012 to look after your revamp? On the big name guests, how do you think it is original research? Adamiow (talk) 16:08, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:M.Mario/sandbox:Doctors Draft. I have included all the characters which have appeared in 3+ episodes. I will also try to create sections for characters who have a massive impact on the main characters, such as family members. The list will look bigger, as there is bound to be more characters which have appeared in more than 3 episodes. I think this will not just be neater, but me much easier to update. For example, the storylines for Mandy, Joe and Howard need updating, which im sure you can do?? And, its OR as in your opinion one person might be a big guest star, where as others may think not. If they are that big of a guest star, there is bound to be a source on them, meaning they would be able to be put in the list. I hope you like it! — M.Mario (T/C) 15:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As long as they are still put on year pages, this looks fine. On the big names, I have not be clear. I really mean those that are sufficient enough stars to have their guest appearance announced in the show, such as Lisa Riley, so it is not original research and mainly from Digital Spy. I still believe a small Others section would be useful for these type of characters if there isn't enough to write a proper chunk for a section. I think we are nearly there on this - woohoo! The only thing left is to split regular and recurring characters on the present list - what do you think on this? Adamiow (talk) 16:00, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, did not reliaze you had replied. Would you be able to update the character page's storylines? Some characetrs are really behind, such as Freya, Mandy, Howard, Joe... Also, did you watch this episode [1]? Which one of the guest actors was Kevin Tyler's relative? Replying to your points, yes the lists would still be 2012, 2011, but on the Others section it would just be a redirect to the list of cast members. Yes, those which recieve development, such as quotes from the BBC should be put in a list. But even if some characters are reported to appear but in the source it just is a rehash of the storylines, then maybe not. Others section gone! I will work hard to try and get all the "main" characters a section. And no for the recurring and regular thing, there is just not enough characters appearing. — M.Mario (T/C) 16:17, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you have AWB right? Well it looks like Doctors (BBC soap opera) is another redirect to the article, so if you ever feel a bit bored, you know what you can do! — M.Mario (T/C) 18:38, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay in responding. Firstly, AWB all done. On the characters, I am happy to flesh out when I have time. I didn't see about Kevin Tyler's relative, but will look into it. On the Others, are you suggesting that they would like to the list of past characters? If so, that seems like a sensible approach and prevents duplication. On the recurring/regular, a small number isn't a reason not to do it - the cast itself is small, so naturally the number of recurring are going to be small. I strongly believe there should be a split and also that the past be put back in alphabetical too. Adamiow (talk) 13:57, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, quite a lot of the characters articles are out of storylines updates. There would be a link to the past list and to the cast members list as well. If your that strongly wanting a split, then I will agree with you. — M.Mario (T/C) 14:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adamiow. You have new messages at M.Mario's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— M.Mario (T/C) 11:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For the work you put into the past list, no one wanted to do it, but you did! :D — M.Mario (T/C) 21:29, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ladyoflaxey (talk) 00:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)LadyofLaxeyLadyoflaxey (talk) 00:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

7 January 2012 Happy New Year, Adamiow. I thank you very much for your welcome to me, and I hope you can help me.

I have not used Talk pages much and I hope this is what you meant. I find the etiquette on Wikipedia difficult to understand and hope that you can guide me through, please.

The Ofsted report is on the Ofsted site - it is December 2012.

Thank you very much.

Best wishes

LadyofLaxey

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Holby City characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adamiow. You have new messages at Ukexpat's talk page.
Message added 01:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ukexpat (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Doctors (soap opera), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Beeblebrox (talk) 17:59, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's a wiki dedicated to available channel lists at www.channelwiki.org. This site houses pages (List of channels on Sky) removed from Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.207.184 (talk) 14:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I am sorry, I didn't see your nomination, and I added a new one under which people began commenting. So I gave you credit as nominator for the nom I added, and closed yours. I suggest you visit to express your support/oppose at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#RD_Marcia_Wallace.

Thanks. μηδείς (talk) 21:08, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Adamiow (talk) 21:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Doctors characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BCB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:48, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to this issue, I believe as the character in question is due to appear in the next televised episode hey should be added to the cast list. I recently did this for the character Guy Self the week before he appeared and no one had any issues. As a regular contributor to this page, I believe it should be this way but I take on board what you have said. Regards CassiusChrome — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassiuschrome (talk • contribs) 21:55, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on my talk page --#Soaper1234 (talk) 18:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replied again #Soaper1234 (talk) 19:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adamiow. You have new messages at Raintheone's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of awards and nominations received by Doctors (soap opera) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | Best Dramatic Performance || [[[Chris Walker (actor)|Chris Walker]] || {{Sho}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of This Morning presenters and reporters may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• holly-willoughby-i-could-go-into-labour-in-september-on-screen|publisher=[[ITV (TV network)]|ITV]]|accessdate=11 July 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Doctors (soap opera), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Walker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of awards and nominations received by Doctors (soap opera) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | Best Acting Performance (Male) (Midland Awards) || [[Chris Walker (actor)|Chris Walker)]] || {{nom}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of awards and nominations received by Doctors (soap opera) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Doctors (soap opera), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Carroll. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Casualty (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Marshall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I edited the episode total as the one you had was incorrect.

Episode 3000 was on 10/09/15, if you check you will see that the total of episodes that you list does not tally.

Thanks

Dbd68 (talk) 23:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sound Digital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. IagoQnsi (talk) 21:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sound Digital, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jazz FM and Magic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've also updated the article, and merged in the content from UTV Radio and UTV Internet to form sections in the main article. I've also retained the former operations in their own section. Cloudbound (talk) 20:46, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was quite lengthy, but I have condensed it somewhat, and as it forms the majority of the group's operations it makes sense to have everything together. Apologies for over-writing some of your other edits. I will add them back in. Cloudbound (talk) 20:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adamiow. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of awards and nominations received by Doctors (TV series) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Holby City characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Susan Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adamiow. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sunday Brunch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Newman and John Robins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adamiow. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adamiow. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ryde Academy Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

I appreciate your edits listing the University Centre Isle of Wight in various lists and navboxes, but as there is no separate article for the University Centre Isle of Wight, it is inappropriate to list it as a redirect, particularly as its parent article (Isle of Wight College) is listed in the same articles. I would encourage you to create a new article for University Centre Isle of Wight if it is to be listed separately. Bleaney (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allan Lake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allan Lake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Flip Format (talk) 20:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]