A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Magnificent Morning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Magnificent Morning until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nate • (chatter) 18:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

I hear you have a disapproval of having Shannon McKain, Diamond White, and Imari Williams being listed in the television infobox for Transformers: Rescue Bots even though they are part of the principal voice actors. I had considered that the cast section for those types of infoboxes would be for the show's principal voice actors. Is there a reason why you don't want the three actors I keep adding not listed? --Rtkat3 (talk) 02:02, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Forbidden Fantasies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forbidden Fantasies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 18:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bikini Pirates, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.tracktvlinks.com/watch-bikini-pirates-2006.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:17, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Discussion is taking place at my talk page regarding the FYI/FYI,/Bio fiasco/mess that Chris1294 inflicted creating two FYI articles. Spshu (talk) 20:54, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for starting the merge discussion with the tags, but User:Chris1294 has just ignored the discussion that I posted to my page and to the article talk page by removing the merger tag and turning my article into a redirect. So, if you would not mind saying some thing at the merge discussion and/or to Chris. Thankds. Spshu (talk) 21:19, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

The article Chastity Bites has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication notability - this is not the same as existence and directory entries do not help establish it as notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 23:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Why can't I add any Disney Channel schedules, it is a popular network. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 11Mike2002 (talk • contribs) 23:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Because the pages, 2013–14 United States network television schedule and 2014–15 United States network television schedule, are only used for TV network schedules; those pages are not for your amusement. AdamDeanHall (talk) 12:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Disney Channel is a TV network — Preceding unsigned comment added by 11Mike2002 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Disney Channel is NOT a TV network. AdamDeanHall (talk) 17:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

It is too a TV network — Preceding unsigned comment added by 11Mike2002 (talk • contribs) 17:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

But NOT a broadcast network like CBS, ABC, NBC, The CW and FOX. AdamDeanHall (talk) 18:10, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Why didn't you just say so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 11Mike2002 (talk • contribs) 21:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on G4 (TV channel). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:07, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Return of the Jedi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carbonite. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Bikini a Go-Go.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Busty Coeds vs Lusty Cheerleaders.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:00, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bikini Jones and the Temple of Eros is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bikini Jones and the Temple of Eros until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ciao Mane (talk) 11:24, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, AdamDeanHall. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Bikini Royale, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Salimfadhley (talk) 21:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Visions of Passion.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Please do not use hyperbole and overactive warnings as you did at User talk:99.109.90.90 threatening to be blocked forever. It is an IP Address and probably switches between users on a daily basis if not more often. A standard warning should be enough. The IP address has been blocked for a couple of days. Let's see how it goes. Thanks. -- Alexf^(talk) 17:21, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Alexf just asked you to tone down your warnings but yet you just added this. The IP was warned about their edit summaries but you add, "You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you revert any Wikipedia pages." Really? What Wikipedia policy or guideline is that from? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:07, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

In fact, the IP was restoring cites for the alternative titles. This is not "damage" and certainly not vandalism. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Genie in a String Bikini.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at G4 (TV channel). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.   Mike V • Talk 16:43, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Girl with the Sex-Ray Eyes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl with the Sex-Ray Eyes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cheers, Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 16:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

I removed the speedy tag that you added to File:Logo-The Hub.png. ‎Even if the network's name will change, the logo can still be used in the article in its historical context. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:10, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

The source specifically mentions Hasbro was in negotiations with Time Warner. It does not say Cartoon Network, and neither does the article in its current state. It feels like you are specifically censoring details included in the source only because you said so. That is not how Wikipedia works. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Additionally, you should not replace sources with a press release like that. Per WP:RS, secondary sources are preferred over primary sources such as press releases. ViperSnake151  Talk  19:09, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Also, your remarks in edit summaries (i.e. "no edits allowed" are, again, running afoul of the "no ownership of articles" rule. It's a shame that you've been acting like this—you're actually a good contributor most of the time. ViperSnake151  Talk  19:26, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Girl with the Sex-Ray Eyes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Xploration Station.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:35, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:The New Adventures of Gigantor.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:45, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Vortexx shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

AHAH! Not surprising!

75.162.179.246 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 05:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Writing Enthusiast ^☎ 15:51, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

FYI I actually do think those IP editors were being a little pushy and fussy over that. I think this is why we also discourage live updates of sports scores too. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your understanding. I like adhering to WP:BRD; it causes less chaos. ViperSnake151  Talk  23:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

I don't understand why you decided to revert back to the all former programming format of the Hub Network programming list. Can you please clarify for me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Electricburst1996 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

All the programs that have aired on the Hub Network in the past are now all former programs. Some programs that are still airing have been transferred to Discovery Family Channel. I hope that's clarification enough for you. AdamDeanHall (talk) 22:57, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Adam, I feel I should talk to you about the history of Star Wars titles as I can see you have been misinformed. The statement "The title, number and episode never actually appeared until after the release of 'The Phantom Menace'" is incorrect. The statement "The Empire Strikes Back (later released as Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back" is incorrect. Finally, the statement "Return of the Jedi (later released as Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi)" is incorrect.

Empire was released in theaters as Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back and not just The Empire Strikes Back. The same goes for "Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi". Despite popular belief, the films were not given numbers for the 1997 Special Editions, nor the 2004 DVD and 2011 Blu-ray releases. Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope was just called Star Wars in 1977, but was given its number and subtitle for it's 1981 re-release. Empire and Jedi were originally released with their respective numbers and subtitles.

Got it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 00717F (talk • contribs) 15:10, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

It does look like "Big, Bigger, Biggest: Supersized!" is an actual TV show,[1]. I'm not sure if it belongs in all those articles. I'll block if it's definite vandalism. Dreadstar ☥ 02:50, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Christine Nguyen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Oleaster (talk·contribs) 15:55, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

• If you want the page to be kept, you are going to have to provide a better reason than that she "happens to be the best actress of all time". [2] The article doesn't even name one of her films, nor are any independent sources provided besides IMDb. I'm not planning to delete the article myself, but some other admins might delete it based on the current (lack of) content. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Christine Nguyen.jpg, which you've attributed to http://drsusanblockinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ChristineNguyen.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 03:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

I have reverted your edit on File:Christine Nguyen.jpg. The article Christine Nguyen was speedily deleted under CSD A7. Therefore, the file is no longer used in any articles and thus does not qualify for free use. Even if it was still used, pictures of living people rarely qualify for free use. In any event, since her article has been deleted, there is no reason why this file should be retained. Safiel (talk) 14:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Christine Nguyen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 17:04, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Christina Cindrich.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Safiel (talk) 18:47, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

The article Christina Cindrich has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Safiel (talk) 19:05, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

I had brought up a a discussion a few months ago arguing that the films were never "retitled" and that Episode IV was only known as "Star Wars" till 1979. You might want to have a look at it. With regards--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

I really hate to break this to you, but the title "A New Hope" wasn't added in the first "Star wars" film until its re-release on April 10, 1981. So I suggest that you change the year from 1979 to 1981. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

It appears you are right. However I still think four years is a short time for people to have known it as only "Star Wars." Since then it was known as A New Hope and all the other films are also equally Star Wars so I support calling it A New Hope--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 19:18, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Discovery Family logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

? postdlf (talk) 19:08, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

[3] Does this mean I just undo your edit then? I'm happy to do that if you don't care to discuss it. But I'd like to hear your reasoning first, and an edit summary that just literally describes what you did is not an explanation. postdlf (talk) 20:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Please do not undo my edit. I like it better without the boldface and without the small print. That's why I removed them. AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

That's not really a reason. I added that formatting to highlight which of the cancellations for that season were for new shows that debuted that season, which is information a reader will be interested in, and the boldface allows them to see that as a glance without duplicating it in a separate list. Do you have a better idea as to how that information can be clearly presented? postdlf (talk) 21:26, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

The boldface and the small print for the cancellations were never used in any of the other TV schedule pages. AdamDeanHall (talk) 22:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes, it's an improvement. Can you explain why you would think otherwise, and can you answer my previous question? postdlf (talk) 23:15, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

I would think otherwise because the boldface and the small print do not belong in the Cancellations/Series endings section and there are no ideas as to how the information can be clearly presented. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Stop edit-warring over one space, please. This is something that is very unnoticeable outside of longtime editors and not that big of a deal at all. An extra space isn't going to break the wiki and this is just absurd that you're taking the article to RFP over this issue. Don't respond and the IP will stop edit warring; this is very easily resolved, and do you really want a 3RR block on your log over something so insignificant? Nate • (chatter) 01:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

One more time, stop it. This edit war is beyond tedious and it's time to drop the stick and move on. Nate • (chatter) 02:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Absolutely not; did you even read my comments above? I'm trying to stop this pointless edit war, not become a proxy to it and risk a block about it. Use the talk pages and settle this, or again don't engage. Nate • (chatter) 23:32, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marry Me (miniseries), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Beatty, David Andrews and Barbara Hall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Reliable Source? That's good coming from the guy who said that Hugh Jackman, Samuel L Jackson, Robert Downey Jr, and that guy who plays the contemporary James Bond were going to be in the STAR WARS Movie based on something a Tabloid said! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxcardun (talk • contribs) 19:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello AdamDeanHall,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Greatest Science Fiction Hits Vol. V for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. DOCUMENT★ERROR 00:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Greatest Science Fiction Hits Vol. IV requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drmies (talk) 01:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Greatest Science Fiction Hits Vol. III requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drmies (talk) 01:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Greatest Science Fiction Hits Vol. II requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drmies (talk) 01:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Greatest Science Fiction Hits requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drmies (talk) 01:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Greatest Science Fiction Hits Vol. II.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Greatest Science Fiction Hits Vol. III.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Greatest Science Fiction Hits Vol. IV.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Greatest Science Fiction Hits Vol. V.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'd like to comment about your recent edit to Galavant. Rather than removing sourced information that is current, please start a discussion on the talk page of said article. I understand that the current TV ratings may not be the final ratings, but I don't personally see that as a valid reason to remove such content. Simply wait for the final ratings to be released and then update the page! Many thanks :) Limbsaw ^~talk~ 19:26, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Dcbanners. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Transformers: Rescue Bots episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dcbanners (talk) 20:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

The article The Adventures of O-Girl: Trapped in Time has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails both general notability guidelines (WP:GNG) and notability guidelines for films (WP:NF)).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FunkyCanute (talk) 14:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

The article Pets.TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of programs broadcast by LAFF, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Over-the-air. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Why are you changing the title of the citation at List of Arrow episodes so that it reads "3x15" instead of "3x16"? The source quite clearly says "3x16", not "3x15". Your edit does not change what the source says and is insertion of false information. --AussieLegend (✉) 21:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for helping out with the season 1-3 page of the series, and the main page :) SerieLover (talk) 21:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi-- I really do not think any information in the future-tense (will be) has any place in a Wikipedia article (unless it is about time travel, perhaps). I would suggest moving your discussion to the talk page to avoid any edit warring warnings (to any of us). I have created the section for that discussion, which seems the appropriate thing to do in this case. Cheers. HullIntegrity^\ talk / 23:24, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Adam, your constant changing of sources to TVBTN, your personal preference, is both insulting to the editor who originally makes a properly sourced edit, and wastes their time for no reason. Frankly, these edits are pointless; to change a source from the Hollywood Reporter, the premiere TV and film source to a media website because you prefer to source to it, and with no rationale, is potentially disruptive editing that may have a quelling effect on future editors (why bother to source an edit when little Adam will just come along and put his pet source in?) This constant, pointless changing of perfectly good sources for no reason needs to stop. --Drmargi (talk) 17:54, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

@Drmargi: @AdamDeanHall:: Why not just use both? ViperSnake151  Talk  17:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

There is that. It's the constant removing of reliable sources for no reason that is at issue. It diminishes the contributions of other editors so he can use his pet site, something for which he's never provided a rationale, and that has to stop. --Drmargi (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:WEBG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:Star Wars The Force Awakens Teaser.jpg, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Mediran [talk] 14:07, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2014–15 United States network television schedule page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaili Say is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaili Say until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 04:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Just a heads-up that Darkseid 77 filed a report involving you at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. He didn't notify you, so I wanted to go ahead and make sure you were aware. —C.Fred (talk) 20:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Please make some comment, any comment on this ANI thread; this is a community site and you are expected to present your views of a situation to understand them. Nate • (chatter) 03:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Per WP:DENY, you should not feed the trolls or at least try not to. Your edit summaries at User talk:Delia's Pony seem to be pushing that. I tend to leave a message to Gabucho and then blank his talk page just to avoid feeding him. --TL22 (talk) 23:47, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

May I ask the justification for the external links you're adding into the articles? Linking to Youtube especially seems improper and promotional. Given that these are featured articles, most of the external links are not providing any additional info. There's no entitlement for any of the links to be blanket-included on any article. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 20:38, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

You are invited to noticeboard here about vandalism on 2014–15 United States network television schedule about IP users adding Marlton School on that article, along with other TV show related articles. BattleshipMan (talk) 05:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Once again, Adam, you've changed a source to Zap2it for no reason, with no explanatory edit summary and no talk page discussion. This is becoming increasingly disruptive and MUST STOP. The two sources had WORD-FOR-WORD the same content, so there is no reason for the change. --Drmargi (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

It would be refreshing if just once you showed some signs of sentient existence and responded to a post. It is a community expectation you continue to ignore. --Drmargi (talk) 14:23, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

And while we're on the subject, edit summaries are not for "witty" valedictions, but to explain to editors why you made an edit. Please refrain from making the (not) clever edit summaries you've begun to write when shows are canceled. No one is impressed, they're not funny and they do not communicate the reason for your edit. --Drmargi (talk) 23:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

A discussion has been started at Talk:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 2) regarding this topic. Please feel free to comment there. Thanks and have a nice day. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - General Health ‖ 14:20, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Please do not create malicious redirects. They are disruptive and are considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ¡Bozzio! 10:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

The article Bikini Avengers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article does not appear to meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

You do not give the orders on the television season articles. Keep your edit summaries descriptive and CIVIL, or it's next stop, ANI. --Drmargi (talk) 00:53, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Beauty & the Beast (season 3) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

I see that you left three reports at AIV today. None of them were actionable. Two of them had never received sufficient warnings to stop any bad behavior, and in the third case the warning was 7 days old. Furthermore, none of them had made more than one or two edits in the past day or so, which is insufficient activity to consider blocking. —Darkwind (talk) 20:48, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

The Decades web page is perfectly normal for me. Maybe you are being redirected somewhere else? http://home.comcast.net/~andyross/Decades.jpg Andyross (talk) 22:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

The article Strippers from Another World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails NFILM and the GNG, little more than a list of credits with no independent reliable sourcing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:50, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

The article Stacked Racks from Mars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails NFILM and the GNG, little more than a list of credits with no independent reliable sourcing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

The article Atomic Hotel Erotica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails NFILM and the GNG, little more than a list of credits with no independent reliable sourcing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

The article The Great Bikini Bowling Bash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails NFILM and the GNG, little more than a list of credits with no independent reliable sourcing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

The article Intergalactic Swingers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails NFILM and the GNG, little more than a list of credits with no independent reliable sourcing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2015–16 United States network television schedule page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Atomic Hotel Erotica.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Intergalactic Swingers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Stacked Racks from Mars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 19 July 2015 (UTC)