Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! NemesisAT (talk) 21:38, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Chuckie Akenz has been reverted.
Your edit here to Chuckie Akenz was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/user/TheRealChuckieA) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:36, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Joana Ceddia have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Joana Ceddia was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkin59aR57-RgqvN04jHSIg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:52, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Russian military deception, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ––FORMALDUDE^(talk) 13:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FTR, FORMALDUDE accepted my explanation for the reason behind the edit and the issue is now resolved: User talk:FormalDude/Archive 3 § Trouted. 84.69.182.103 (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rape during the Bosnian War, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 13:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC) [reply]

FTR, Materialscientist accepted my explanation for the reason behind the edit and the issue is now resolved: User talk:Materialscientist § Alleged disruptive edits. 84.69.182.103 (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Māori culture. ––FORMALDUDE^(talk) 13:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FTR, FORMALDUDE accepted my explanation for the reason behind the edit and the issue is now resolved: User talk:FormalDude/Archive 3 § Trouted. 84.69.182.103 (talk) 14:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To keep you sustained as you toil in the valley of broken {{sfn}} templates. Wham2001 (talk) 11:06, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ☺ Mmmm, yummy! 84.69.182.103 (talk) 11:13, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to thank you for your edit to History of Asia that preserves the existing quotes contained in the uses of Template:sfn throughout the article.

I assume that the article originally used some other ref style that supported the quote parameter, but at some time got changed to use sfn which does not support it. Seeing this talk page, then looking at contributions, I see you are deleting the quote parameter from sfn templates on many articles.

When I saw the quotes being deleted at History of Asia, I reverted, and asked in the edit summary for some other solution. You came through, moving the quote parameter from the sfn template to added rp templates, which support the quote parameter. Not many editors are fans of the rp template; I use it, yet didn't know it supported quote. Your solution is clever and helpful.

As stated on my revert, I do not support simply deleting the unsupported quote parameter and its quote. Leaving them as effectively hidden text available only to editors is preferable to deleting them. (Existing only in article history won't work if no one know they are in the history.) I like the solution you used for History of Asia, and encourage you to use that instead of deleting quotes going forward, and even go back and do this for other articles where the quote parm was deleted. Or simply leave them as they were; quotes available to only to editors is preferable to losing the quotes for all.

Thanks again; --A D Monroe III^(talk) 17:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some great contributions from this IP address! Thank you for your work on Wikipedia—I strongly suggest you create an account if you don't have one! — Vigursii • 📨 21:19, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CoinR. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CoinR (talk) 09:45, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained revert done without any justification by a now-permanently banned user. Phew. 84.69.182.103 (talk) 14:29, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will fix the references on Attaphila. Quit edit-warring. jp×g 02:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As the draft you created in the sandbox has been cleared by a bot, I have copied it to Draft:Trams in Olsztyn. dudhhr_Contribs 15:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trams in Olsztyn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gorden 2211 (talk) 23:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]