There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Original research by IP 2601:4C1:C001:1878:D16B:6CA7:37BB:F6B9 (and several other addresses).The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:No original research. Thank you. JustinTime55 (talk) 15:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HanotLo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rutan Long-EZ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. HanotLo (talk) 03:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Corkythehornetfan. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Andrew McCabe seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Corky 23:38, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please be advised that I have opened a new section relating to you at Talk:Stefan Halper. I urge you to engage in this discussion and allow time for consensus to form as to whether or not your edits to Stefan Halper should be accepted. Thank you. KalHolmann (talk) 23:18, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Stefan Halper. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Safety Cap (talk) 18:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm PolicyReformer. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bill Nelson seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Policy Reformer(c) 23:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Gwen Graham's article violate WP:NPOV. You are attempting to introduce bias to the article. Please stop that. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. You're violating the WP:ROWN rule. Knock it off. If you want to make an edit, go right ahead. Your revert warring is wrong and a violation of policy. Stop it, now. Shape up and read the rules. Revert_only_when_necessary 68.46.226.6 (talk) 03:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's necessary when dealing with POV edits like those, changing the content on ACA, bringing up the corruption investigation in Tallahassee for no reason, and other things. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:12, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There *was* a clear reason to bring up the corruption investigation. First it was out of character for Graham given her attacks on the President, second that strategy did not result in her winning the nomination. Like I said, despite your WP:ROWN violation I welcom your edits. I do not welcome your childish revert warring. Let's see an edit. 68.46.226.6 (talk) 04:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gwen Graham, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 04:05, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please explain what is "disruptive" about using a left wing source, like Slate, in an edit of an article on a left wing politician like Graham. 68.46.226.6 (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]