May 2008

Test/Vandalism warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BillCJ (talk) 22:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Terminator (franchise), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Terminator (franchise) was changed by 138.162.8.57 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-07-24T22:39:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to List of unusual deaths has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jonathan talk - contribs - review me! 21:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Texas, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wiki Roxor (talk) 17:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Your edits to September 9

Dear 138.162.8.57,
Some of your edits on the page September 9 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 10:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ford Lightning, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JForget 23:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gayle King, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 18:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Derek Nelson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 13:14, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Monica Bellucci, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. --The Firewall 11:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at LGBT rights in the United States, you will be blocked from editing. EqualRights (talk) 01:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Fire has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. George The Dragon (talk) 16:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Recession, you will be blocked from editing. CRETOG8(t/c) 16:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Menstrual cycle.  —SMALLJIM  16:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. SoWhy 17:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Half-life has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 03:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Late fee has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 15:26, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pearl Jam. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.-5- (talk) 20:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Tony Rezko. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Loonymonkey (talk) 18:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Al Sharpton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 21:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to St. Mary's County Sheriff's Office. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Daniel 1992 (talk) 21:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at French people, you will be blocked from editing. - Wikigi | talk to me | 09:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Alice's Adventures in Wonderland has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Thingg^⊕⊗ 23:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Germantown Academy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 18:28, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Frankford High School. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 20:29, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Todd McShay has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 22:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jonah Goldberg. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Uncle Dick (talk) 22:11, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Jonah Goldberg, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Uncle Dick (talk) 22:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nja²⁴⁷ 20:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Celibacy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:22, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to New Kids on the Block. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Susan118 (talk) 14:44, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Regina Spektor. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 14:48, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Titanium. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Wizard191 (talk) 22:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Dear 138.162.8.57,
Some of your edits on the page January 5 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 01:09, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Kathleen, Georgia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. HarlandQPitt (talk) 20:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Until It Sleeps ^{Wake me} 16:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Alfred George Edwards. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Intelligentsium 17:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Mollie King. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Intelligentsium 17:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. RunningOnBrains^{(talk page)} 18:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Department of Defense Police. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Miami Dolphins has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 04:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Barney Frank. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Cube lurker (talk) 18:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Alexander the Great has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. KiraChinmoku _{(Talk, My Contribs)} 12:36, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Interstate 69, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -MBK₀₀₄ 23:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alabama, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 09:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to North Pole, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Barret (talk) 18:02, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rolla High School, you may be blocked from editing. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 09:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Climatic Research Unit hacking incident, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 17:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Gay (disambiguation) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 04:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Gay (disambiguation). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 04:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ralphie May. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 15:56, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Input lag has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Evenios (talk) 20:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Busy Beaver. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ferkel (talk) 10:15, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zachlipton (talk) 03:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Monticello, Indiana. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. N419BH 03:25, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I reverted your edit to Encyclopædia Britannica. I checked around online, and it appears that it is still in print. If you know of a source that indicates that it has gone out of print, it would be great if you put back in your edit and added the source as a citation. Thanks! --Susfele (talk) 01:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Monticello, Indiana has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 03:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to USS Vandegrift (FFG-48). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -MBK₀₀₄ 03:02, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your recent edit to the Medical cannabis article as unconstructive. Please read the relevant source document before making changes about it in the future. The source, a legitimate, peer-reviewed journal, refers to "studies" and "trials" interchangably. In any case, with regard to Tourette's Syndrome, the research reported included multiple randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designs, one of which included crossover. I note, btw, that the Wikipedia article on clinical trials includes many errors, not the least of which is its exclusive focus on commercial product development. Governmental sponsorship of research is completely irrelevant as to whether research can appropriately be called a clinical trial. Again, please read the source next time before you change what's written about it on Wikipedia.  – OhioStandard (talk) 21:58, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Navy/Marine Corps Intranet has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/NMCI-NavyMarine-Corps-Intranet-Fan-Page/137397059632528?ref=ts.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:44, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

To edit, please log in.

21:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
TheSandBot (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. SoWhy 08:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Blocked for 1 week.

This block was based, in part, on this July 29 edit to the article on the Bureau of Naval Personnel, and this July 30 edit to the article about Nicole Polizzi, and this August 3 edit to Navy/Marine Corps Intranet ( later reverted, with a link subsequently inserted to a newly-created and dubious facebook "fan" page ), and in part on the ongoing history of vandalism emanating from this IP address. People here truly appreciate the many high-quality, constructive edits that have emanated from this IP address, but there have just been too many vandalism and unconstructive/unreferenced edits to allow access to continue unsanctioned. You obviously have a lot to offer; the block will expire in one week, so please take that time to reconsider how you participate here and come back after that interval with a willingness to help improve the encyclopedia rather than damage it for a cheap laugh. I'd appreciate that, and I know everyone else here would as well. Thanks,  – OhioStandard (talk) 13:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Willie the Pimp, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Joel M. Chat ✐ 16:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 16:18, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is to inform Wikipedia users that I've begun a thread at the Administrator's Notice Board for Incidents that concerns this IP address. Based on a review of editing activity it appears that other accounts or IP addresses are being used to evade the block currently in place on this IP address. Details can be found by searching for this IP address at the Administrator's Notice Board for Incidents.  – OhioStandard (talk) 01:49, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Intravenous immunoglobulin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CliffC (talk) 20:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:42, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Irukandji jellyfish worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 06:15, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Coolio has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:36, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spleen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you! -- Katiker (talk) 05:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The O'Reilly Factor has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 02:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The O'Reilly Factor constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 03:00, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States Navy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -fnlayson (talk) 13:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I just wanted to stop and say thanks for blocking this IP from editing. Wikipedia has too many editors concerned with article creation and trying to get information to the world. Blocking this IP will help make it much harder for that to happen and will make sure that humanity remains ignorant and in the dark. This will also allow for the editors who currently have power (you call yourself administrators I think) to prevent regular editors and users from accomplishing anything meaningful and ensuring the rest of the non administrators stay firmly under the boot. Well done. I will wait in anticipation of the day when Wikipedia is no longer around. As the Wikidrama increases the usefullness and desirability of the pedia will decrease exponentially. WP reached its peak in about 08 and has been steadily declining since then thanks to all of you. --138.162.8.57 (talk) 15:06, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a general comment for anyone reading this or thinking about blocking this IP. This IP is used by the NMCI network and could be any one of hundreds of thousands of people within the Navy and Marine Corps network. So if this IP is blocked it means those hundreds of thousands of people can't contribute. 138.162.8.57 (talk) 14:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - redirects now speedily deleted under criterion G8, save for one which I've changed to redirect to the album list. Whouk (talk) 14:42, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. 138.162.8.57 (talk) 14:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Massachusetts/to do, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Na-Class, which is recorded on the article's [[Talk:Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Massachusetts/to do|talk page]]. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Obtund. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Hair of the dog because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Obtund^Talk 18:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Dentalplanlisa. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Organizing that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dental plan (Lisa needs braces) 15:14, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm PCHS-NJROTC. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bluetick Coonhound because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 20:25, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bluetick Coonhound. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. James086^Talk 12:40, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at Fiordland. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing. —hike395 (talk) 15:58, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Talk:The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. --Rob Sinden (talk) 13:34, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Test for the new Discussion logic. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 19:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fluffernutter. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Racquetball, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Velella. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Birdsboro, Pennsylvania, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   19:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maerua andradae. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Widr (talk) 17:03, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of video games based on anime or manga may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:45, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion about some edits made from this IP address at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive255#Kumioko socking. Fram (talk) 08:21, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You recently added a record (Drew Brees 5 season w/ 30+ TDs) to the List of National Football League records (individual), but failed to provide a reference for this addition. If you have a source for this information, please provide it on the article or the contribution will have to be removed as unsourced. Thanks! — DeeJayK (talk) 17:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Duane R. Bushey has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 17:20, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dougweller (talk) 19:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Leaky Caldron 19:10, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:55, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Meritorious Service Medal (United States), you may be blocked from editing. EricSerge (talk) 02:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@NinaGreen: Greetings Nina, I saw the comment on your talk page and I wanted to let you know I have been banned from the project. They say its 6 months but since they'll continue to find things to blame me for whether its me or not, its pretty much indefinite. I wanted to let you know I understand what you are going through and I am not ignoring you. I just cannot edit your talk page and will likely soon be blocked to prevent me from editing. 138.162.8.57 (talk) 18:58, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paradiving, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paradiving, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 138.162.8.57. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Paradiving".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paradiving}}, paste it in the edit box at , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 09:04, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me User:Timotheus Canens, sorry for the interruption. I noticed a banner on this page that you blocked this IP. Any chance you would be willing to unlock it? This IP is used by a lot of people in the Navy and although I am sure that someone must have done some bad changes, others might do some helpful ones. I for one was going to edit an article but couldn't.

Sorry whoever you are, that's not going to happen they are blocking this IP to punish me for criticizing abuse of the tools by some admins and the Admin corps on this site protect their own ferociously. When it comes to criticizing the admins on Wikipedia, who have the power to block accounts, editing the project doesn't matter to them. They would gladly sacrifice 1 million edits and 10 million editors to make sure that I cannot edit and they aren't criticized for abusing their access or their complete and utter failure to handle their business and address the problem. Basically its easier and more politically efficient to silence the critic than to fix the problem. So, if Tim unblocks this IP, even though its used by half the US Navy, I would be incredibly surprised. They hate the air that I breath and the Wikipedia admins/Arbcom can be a vindictive bunch. Your better off just letting the misspelling, vandalism, expansion, etc. stay there. Also, if you come back to comment again, I recommend including your "signature" with ~~~~ at the end of the comment. Even though your an IP and its not exactly a signature, its considered good manners to sign posts. Cheers! Reguyla 138.162.8.57 (talk) 21:14, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Reguyla for the response, Seems like there might be more to the story, but it seems reasonable that if you criticized someone with the ability to block you that is what they did. It seems like there should be a system in place to keep that from happening, but maybe not. Its too bad about the collateral damage and blocking this IP, but if they are more worried about keeping you from editing than about all the other people who can't because of it then that's unfortunate and a loss for Wikipedia in general. I even tried to submit my request to something called articles for creation but that wouldn't work either so I guess its not that important. Have a good weekend. 138.162.8.57 (talk) 20:47, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Salvio giuliano: - Salvio giuliano, I just wanted to stop by and let you know that blocking this IP for a year, simply to keep me from contributing to the project because I actively advocate that admins should be held responsible and accountable for their actions, is pretty much on par with what I have come to expect from you and the other members of the Arbitration committee. It would be far better to simply unblock my account, since it should have already been unblocked anyway, to facilitate my ability to edit and contribute to the site but you and your peers continue to make a different choice because it is what you want. It's actions like this that stand out to everyone and show with clear evidence why editors are leaving, why newspapers and magazines are increasingly printing stories about corruption and problems with the site and why new people are not being recruited. So, the next time someone asks you what you have done to help Wikipedia, you can answer, "Nothing, I have prevented edits from getting done out of spite, from a high output, dedicated editor who believes in the project, to ensure myself and my fellow admins are free from criticism!" 138.162.8.57 (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Carrite: I couldn't agree more with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJimbo_Wales&diff=653627715&oldid=653624611 your assessment here. I think Roger has it completely wrong. Deleting content is not how to fix the problem. We fix the problem by making the editing environment better and not blocking everyone for silly reasons, not banning every IP, not running off new editors that haven't learned all the rules and not being complacent when actual issues are brought up. It shouldn't take a month long case to remove the tools from an abusive admin or one that's violating the rules like Wifione was. 138.162.8.57 (talk) 17:35, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 138.162.8.57. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
• instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.
Please read Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guidelines before editing any United States military or government related articles to ensure you are in compliance. Thank you - ^theWOLFchild 01:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from HSM-46 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! TheSandDoctor (talk) 14:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to John Peyton (U.S. politician), especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. El cid, el campeador (talk) 13:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Daughters of Isis— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 14:16, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to St. Marys, Georgia. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ammarpad. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kim (given name) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ammarpad (talk) 13:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm PiGuy3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Peyton (U.S. politician) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. PiGuy3 (talk) 20:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

To edit, please log in.

21:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
TheSandBot (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Doug Weller talk 12:02, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edits to Thomas Moody and Waldon appear to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 14:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HunMaster. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Naval Station Mayport have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. HunMaster (talk) 13:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Érico. I noticed that in this edit to Christopher Steele, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Érico (talk) 12:10, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]