User talk:Cysquatch
Not sure why you removed my edit out of Mike Piazza's page. I added the correct pronunciation which is very helpful for those unfamiliar with his name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banks518 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 4 jul 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I've seen you around recent changes reverting vandalism, oftentimes ninjaing me :P But anyway, good job! InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 02:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC) |
Dealer07
Indeffed by Ponyo. (Feel free to unhat, -Alabama-, but this is what I tend to do with sox who were arguing with people on their talks.) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 20:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I don't even know the "accused" guy or the guy that putted my in that list, why do you keep reverting my edit? Semikon06 (talk) 19:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
|
Don't stalk me please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.66.180.130 (talk) 21:42, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
page vandalism
Hi Alabama, just to let you know that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Infinityplex is also vandalising the other page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_registration_plates_of_Australia I have undone the changes three times as it is not relevant to the page. I am not more experienced in dealing with the wikipedia pages vandalism and is only learning how to do. thanks Welldone65 (talk) 04:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Notice
Hello, can you add the death of the Panamanian architect Ariana Lyma Young, who died at the age of 37, to Deaths in 2022, please and thank you. https://www.midiario.com/curiosidades/se-conmueven-las-redes-muere-la-twitera-ariana-lyma-motivadora-quien-lucho-contra-el-cancer-hasta-su-ultimo-suspiro/.
181.197.45.13 (talk) 20:31, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Rollback
Hi -Alabama-. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 03:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Everything will be OK. Please feel free to request several months later Pavlov2 (talk) 18:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC) |
- @Pavlov2: thank you very much! I'll do my best to progress and learn from my mistakes. -Alabama- (talk) 18:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Several days ago, my request of GR also failed due to similar reason too soon, a friendly editor encouraged me like this. So I'd like to send the same encouragement to you. Please feel free to contact me if you need further help. Pavlov2 (talk) 18:59, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
Thanks for keeping Wikipedia safe from vandalism! LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 21:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your efforts in anti-vandalism, even on different Wiki's. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:48, 17 May 2022 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I see vandalism, and then i go to revert it and see that you have already reverted it... great job Kadermonkey the monkey (talk) 21:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC) |
The term "Gerry Anderson's"
It just seems pointless. And it's not it's name. It's name is just "new Captain Scarlet" 81.101.7.190 (talk) 20:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
57 years should be quite long enough
I am pretty sure that someone who died in 1965 is not a "living person", and therefore is not covered under the BLP policy. Unless there is some other WP policy I'm not aware of? 2603:7080:EB3F:BE09:8987:ACC8:8B02:7B0D (talk) 21:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I've seen your name come up reverting vandalism on several articles now in wildly different areas, so much so that I was like "I recognize that name!" and I figure that's worthy of a barnstar. Askarion 💬●✒️ 01:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC) |
Santhanam filmography
How you are saying it’s non constructive. He actually in films he first appeared as a comedian and then as a hero. That’s the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.99.137.208 (talk) 16:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Answered. -Alabama- (talk) 16:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.58.203.49 (talk) 17:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Draw the Line
It was an accident, I was trying to fix the previous user's vandalism edit. User 178.46.198.0 179.34.41.230 (talk) 20:46, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi I done it mistake ok world billoners — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.231.249.9 (talk) 12:59, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Billy Bragg
When Billy Bragg's page was vandalised calling him cis, it was because he's a trans ally: https://twitter.com/billybragg/status/1537403855822012419 . It was transphobic vandalism rather than an editing test. Further proof of this can be found in the user's other edits - which nearly only consists of transphobic vandalism - including comparing trans people to Nazis even though we were persecuted and killed in the Holocaust. 92.21.223.3 (talk) 04:09, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Editors like you who put in a lot of Anti-Vandalism work deserve more recognition. Thank you for your assistance on this website! 47.227.95.73 (talk) 18:34, 12 July 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks, 47.227.95.73. This software won't let me thank anonymous users :P -Alabama- (talk) 23:15, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Re
I don't like him. 2600:6C64:7D3F:97BB:7C63:830E:371F:7C0E (talk) 17:58, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
Thank you for everything that you do to help defend the Wiki against vandals. You're fantastically awesome. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:05, 3 August 2022 (UTC) |
My recent edits were removed
Restore my edits now Sakti007 (talk) 22:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
-Alabama
I am trying to get help? why wont anyone help me? Instead you just threaten me with blocking? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.38.246.39 (talk) 16:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for the work you are doing to keep vandals at bay. LizardJr8 (talk) 17:47, 14 August 2022 (UTC) |
???
To answer your question[1] that is what I usually refer to as "fat fingers". When editing from a mobile device it is very easy to accidently hit a button and unintentionally insert markup at the top of the page. I've done it too many times, but it wasn't me this time, I double checked.[2] Thanks for the fix. -- 109.79.70.185 (talk) 01:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Simpsons movie important ASAP please return my message!
Hi Alabama, please respond ASAP to alert me that you read this. I am an executive assistant at Matt Groening's studio, and he has authorized me to make these changes. If you are interested in learning more, i can share the specifics in a separate message Simpsonfan1212 (talk) 18:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Just FYI, what you're looking at there is the subject of the article who wants to have it deleted. There's currently a discussion on the talk page regarding whether it fulfills WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. Madeline (part of me) 17:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for notifying me. In SWViewer it only showed me the latest edit, and it seemed like a blanking pages. -Alabama- (talk) 17:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Christopher R. Cooke
@Cysquatch Why did you deem the following an inappropriate link? https://www.scs.edu/staff_members/bishop-elect-christopher-cooke/ It was a way to objectively cite information added to the Christopher R. Cooke page. 2601:44:8600:9310:F166:EC82:C8FC:AE8F (talk) 20:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
- From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!
- Special report: Public Domain Day 2024
- Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit
- News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
- WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
- Obituary: Anthony Bradbury
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023
- Comix: Conflict resolution
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
- News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail
- Opinion: Until it happens to you
- Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry
- Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"
- Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down
The Signpost: 13 February 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers
- Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go?
- Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi?
- Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football
- Crossword: Our crossword to bear
- Comix: Strongly
The Signpost: 2 March 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"
- Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"
- In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record
- Obituary: Vami_IV
- Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday
- WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close
The Signpost: 29 March 2024
- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue
The Signpost: 25 April 2024
- In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics and another wikirace on live TV
- News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)
- Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
- Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem
The Signpost: 16 May 2024
- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Obituary: Hanif Al Husaini, Salazarov and Hyacinth
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- Discussion report: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush
Why
Why did you revert my edits. You are so mean, it says that wikipedia is free to edit for everyone. I hate you for that. Wikipedia is liar, you are liar Wtre (talk) 02:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
- @Cassiopeia: they were reverting vandalism. APK hi :-) (talk) 09:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- So sorry, the message was not mean for you but the vandal. I think I clicked the wrong line in HG. So sorry. My bad. Cassiopeia talk 10:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 (2)
Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Wikipedia. We appreciate this, but unfortunately your edit was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's page history to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 00:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I do too many rollbacks per day, including today, so I don't know which one you are referring to. If I didn't remove everything necessary, then you do it. Patrolling recent changes is a team effort. Cysquatch (talk) 00:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not trying to make personal attacks towards you and never intend to make personal attacks towards any contributor. What I'm trying to tell you was that there was more than one user patrolling recent changes and you weren't the only one and to just suggest that you revert a few and other contributors revert a few, also to note it was done a few seconds after the revision you reverted was made. I didn't do it because I think you did bad, you didn't do bad at all. I think you're doing a good job reverting bad faith edits. You can be a little bit civil but please also note that I have ASD, so be mostly friendly and nice towards others rather than be offended towards other users. Thanks, PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 01:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I wasn’t offended, and you didn’t do anything wrong. I just responded based on what little I understood. I apologize for any misunderstanding. Cysquatch (talk) 02:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not trying to make personal attacks towards you and never intend to make personal attacks towards any contributor. What I'm trying to tell you was that there was more than one user patrolling recent changes and you weren't the only one and to just suggest that you revert a few and other contributors revert a few, also to note it was done a few seconds after the revision you reverted was made. I didn't do it because I think you did bad, you didn't do bad at all. I think you're doing a good job reverting bad faith edits. You can be a little bit civil but please also note that I have ASD, so be mostly friendly and nice towards others rather than be offended towards other users. Thanks, PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 01:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
Elli (talk | contribs) 22:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
This Month in GLAM: September 2024
|
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?
This Month in GLAM: October 2024
|
This Month in Education: October 2024
The Signpost: 18 November 2024
The Signpost: 18 November 2024
- News and notes: Open letter to WMF about court case breaks one thousand signatures, big arb case declined, U4C begins accepting cases
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Endowment audit reports: FY 2023–2024
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
This Month in Education: November 2024
This Month in GLAM: November 2024
|
The Signpost: 12 December 2024
- News and notes: Arbitrator election concludes
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel articles 5
- Disinformation report: Sex, power, and money revisited
- Op-ed: On the backrooms by Tamzin
- In the media: Like the BBC, often useful but not impartial
- Traffic report: Something Wicked for almost everybody
The Signpost: 24 December 2024
- From the archives: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- Recent research: "Wikipedia editors are quite prosocial", but those motivated by "social image" may put quantity over quality
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Traffic report: Was a long and dark December
The Signpost: 24 December 2024
- From the archives: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- Recent research: "Wikipedia editors are quite prosocial", but those motivated by "social image" may put quantity over quality
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Traffic report: Was a long and dark December