Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Adhoc Party for PlayStation Portable, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 07:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Welcome to the English Wikipedia! Fun and Interesting Pages Userpage guidelines Load a random article! Userbox directory Join a WikiProject Are you a Wikipediholic? The top editors The motto of the day Some really bad ideas..... The Department of Fun! Wikisongs!! Some new article ideas Some very odd articles..... List of the newest users Barnstars! List of user rewards List of pages most vandalized Very frequently asked questions Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia The reward board (earn $$$) Get articles to edit from SuggestBot Find out how many edits you have! Hello, Smeagol 17, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:   Introduction  5    The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Be Bold   Assume Good faith   Keep cool   Get adopted   Neutral point of view And here are some pages on what to avoid: How to avoid Copyright infringement How not to spam Make sure not to get blocked, which should be no problem after reading this The Three-Revert-Rule and how to avoid breaking it If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Smeagol_17. A few days ago I started a discussion about the use of terminology sections on Wikipedia articles about anime and manga. Your opinion on this topic will be greatly appreciated. Thank you and happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Naruto: Ultimate Ninja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sasori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bleach DVD season 16 volume 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bleach DVD season 16 volume 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in PlayStation Vita, makes articles harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GSK (talk ● evidence) 17:45, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Town Where You Live, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chiaki Takahashi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you're invited to vote and express your views about this on the discussion topic. Jotamide (talk) 23:46, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.

Hello, you're invited to vote and express your views on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Guilty Gear soundtracks. Jotamide (talk) 21:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Witcher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This edit caused a disruptive WP:INTDABLINK error. Please do not ever cause an intentional link to a disambiguation page to be created again. Cheers! bd2412 T 03:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smeagol 17. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! A while ago I started putting together this draft article but fell behind with it unfortunately. Now I would like to get it done before the next release (Guilty Gear Xrd Revelator 2) is out. I've left this message on your talk page since you have recently participated in the Guilty Gear Xrd article. Hope you can give me a hand. Thanks in advance. :) Jotamide (talk) 17:07, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

False Dmitry I (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to False Dmitry

Time of Troubles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to False Dmitry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smeagol 17. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

My very best wishes (talk) 19:12, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You asked "where the rules?" [to discuss content] in your edit summary [1]. Please check WP:Consensus and also links in this template. My very best wishes (talk) 19:15, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@My very best wishes: I know those rules. You acted like I broke them by my unilateral edit. I did not. Smeagol 17 (talk) 19:30, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:39, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Niemirowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Niemirów (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vladimir Vladimirovich Kara-Murza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oligarch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smeagol 17. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rocky III, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Rocky III, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:11, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate:Sorry for my gullibility. I brought the numbers and references from the franchise Rocky page without properly checking them, Should we remove it there(and in Rocky 5), too?

You violated the one revert per 24 hours page restriction on Douma chemical attack. Please self revert.- MrX 🖋 11:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MrX: I reverted only once Smeagol 17 (talk) 11:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1. 08:44, February 18, 2019
2. 09:29, February 18, 2019

Please revert #2 - MrX 🖋 11:44, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MrX: The first one is considered a revert? Ok. Smeagol 17 (talk) 11:48, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.- MrX 🖋 11:54, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Smeagol 17. - MrX 🖋 12:10, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello- Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

• Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
  • The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
• Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 13:45, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Erik: I did not edit Patrick O'Brian, as far as I know. Did you mistake me for someone else? Smeagol 17 (talk) 14:58, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, boy, that was a stupid copy-paste blunder, sorry! I deleted that part. I just meant to remind you that it helps the rest of us when you leave an edit summary. Now you have reminded me to actually pay attention to what I'm posting on talkpages... Eric ^talk 15:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Smeagol 17. - MrX 🖋 19:56, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At least spell it right , it's 'government' o.k. 78.144.81.175 (talk) 01:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@78.144.81.175: Thank you, corrected. Also thanks for your self-control) Smeagol 17 (talk) 06:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

goverNment, o.k. FFS. 78.144.81.175 (talk) 16:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. Will try to be more carefull. Smeagol 17 (talk) 17:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You might know but I nominated Shirou Emiya to GA. I'm not confident with the article's state so feel free to edit it if there are areas that need improvement. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 16:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It showing how demographic losses are used that's why he is used twice on that page for that example Jack90s15 (talk) 14:19, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jack90s15: Both paragraphs are about that. Why write the same thing twice?Smeagol 17 (talk) 17:16, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It showing how demographic losses are used and its showing how Conquest used demographic losses to get to his number

it fits the flow of the page Jack90s15 (talk) 17:53, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

or what about one of us trim it to say ?

Some of these estimates rely in part on demographic losses Conquest explained how he arrived at his estimate: "I suggest about eleven million by the beginning of 1937, and about three million over the period 1937–38, making fourteen million. The eleven-odd million is readily deduced from the undisputed population deficit shown in the suppressed census of January 1937, of fifteen to sixteen million, by making reasonable assumptions about how this was divided between birth deficit and deaths."? Jack90s15 (talk) 17:56, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Smeagol 17 (talk) 18:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glad we could resolve this Jack90s15 (talk) 15:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

a cookie for you for helping with the situation with the page Jack90s15 (talk) 15:27, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your 14 June 2018 edits to the article for The Witcher said that the anthology Maladie and Other Stories included the stories "The Road with No Return" and "Something Ends, Something Begins".

Are you sure about that? And if so, why? I don't think it has those stories. Maybe they're in the Polish version, but not the English translation. - 72.186.111.112 (talk) 01:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have now developed a theory that the English book called "Malady and Other Stories" is not a translation of the entire Polish anthology called "Malady and Other Stories." Instead it's just a translation of the single short story The Malady, and not the other short stories that were in the anthology. Plus they added a few random other things in with it. What do you think? If that's true, we should note it in the Wikipedia article. - 72.186.111.112 (talk) 01:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@72.186.111.112::: You are right, see: https://witcher.gamepedia.com/The_Malady_and_Other_StoriesSmeagol 17 I added something.Smeagol 17 (talk) 06:51, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radio Yerevan jokes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of the Navy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On your edit to List_of_J-Novel_Club_titles. You moved the entry for Banner of the Stars from the Completed Titles list to the Titles in Publication list. I was under the impression that this title was complete at six volumes. Am I wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulNeb86 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@PaulNeb86: As far as I know, it is not finished (see, for example english and japanese wikipedia pages for it and the 6th volume description) Smeagol 17 (talk) 01:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After looking at the publisher's website, I'm inclined to agree with you. I guess it's like Mixed Bathing and goes a very long time between releases. Thanks for fixing that. PaulNeb86 (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PaulNeb86: More like ASOIAF.) Smeagol 17 (talk) 21:21, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 03:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully; it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, such as 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Syria, which you have recently edited. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. GreyShark (dibra) 06:19, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Feodosia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smurf234 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Smurf234: Leave a signature when you post. It is common courtesy. Smeagol 17 (talk) 16:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1: Thanks, but I already have seen who it was.) Smeagol 17 (talk) 20:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was primarily for the benefit of the rest of us. Though, it also helps archive-bot programs.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder how the world post coronavirus pandemic would be? The Indian Bride (talk) 23:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw a Raccoon dog at the Oklahoma City zoo! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.228.100.116 (talk) 18:00, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Alita: Battle Angel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Davefelmer (talk) 02:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Davefelmer: I posted on the talk page on 21 May, but you did not engage, even after I directed you there.Smeagol 17 (talk) 07:45, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A throwaway sentence at the end of a long-over previous discussion thread is not posting on the talk page and does not give you free reign to undo the product of past discussions and edit war on the article, especially when nobody has so much as replied. Nor did you direct me there until about an hour ago when you still did not open a new discussion thread as you're supposed to. I don't know why you insist on changing details, when your post history easily shows this. Davefelmer (talk) 08:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Davefelmer:You think I should have done differently: OK, you are entitled to your position. But I did not change any details. It all happened as I stated. Smeagol 17 (talk) 08:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Yevpatoria shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Mongol167 (talk) 11:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Davefelmer (talk) 01:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RandomCanadian. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Altima Ace. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there only 12 episodes in Uzaki chan wants to hang out?? SuswetaDas (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but a second season was announced. Smeagol 17 (talk) 20:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To remove a review because you think it's not a review, as you did on the Interspecies Reviewers page runs counter to Wikipedia's rules. Please do not do that again or your edits will be reversed. --Historyday01 (talk) 23:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nausicaa2covercropped.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Can you please share a comment in the talk page of Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba the Movie: Mugen Train regarding the proposed new sections in the article. Your comment is necessary for the success of the discussion. いちか かすが (talk) 13:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Hey there. Since you've also made some contributions to the Eva articles here, would you mind, if you have the time, to give a third opinion at Talk:Kaworu Nagisa#Section break 2? The other editor that has been updating the Eva articles is much more adamant about some of the stuff here than he was in the other articles and though his work is generally good it did need adjustments before. I already made hundreds of edits to his previous rewrites. I think he doesn't realize he's not close enough to NPOV - he used a lot of inaccurate translations and was way too selective in his representation of facts. I presented some 10+ new sources that were necessary to improve things and had to rewrite about a third of the article. He agreed to that initially but after a while just started to stonewall me. It bugs me because I don't want to discourage him. I am not sure how much you do know or care about Eva, so it might or might not be too long of a discussion, but you can probably just read the section break there and chip in - my actual detailing and sources are in the preceding wall of text, which you can ignore if you want to. The page is currently locked so there's plenty of time. Thank you. FelipeFritschF (talk) 18:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am reasonably familiar with Evangelion, but not so much with interviews, drafts and such. For what it is worth, I think your position looks more supported by sources and general wiki policy. Smeagol 17 (talk) 06:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I must said I initially hadn't considered I was making things too detailed for general users but I assumed it'd be necessary to talk with the other editor. It's just that he's refusing to engage now, accusing me of vandalism and sophistry, which is why I'm looking for other people to chip in as third opinions in the talk page so he can understand what I'm coming from. Broadly, I'm reasonably sure he just went unnoposed for years in the (much less active and read) Italian wiki so he just assumes he's necessarily right. I asked some outside people to consult and one of them did chip in there but also got largely ignored. With the new movie out this is bound to happen, for better or worse.FelipeFritschF (talk) 21:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to bother you with this again, but is it possible you leave a third opinion there, as the editor refuses to talk to me? There is of course an increased number of views due to the new film release, so I'd prefer if speculation treated as fact or misquotations of jokes made by non-staffers weren't around. Or should I seek some other avenue of resolution?FelipeFritschF (talk) 00:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I think the articles should limit fancruft and inclusion of reviews only to push a POV wit an undue weight, but my limited knowledge of Evangelion's creation and fandom prevents me from being very authoritative on the subject. You can try to post on a noticeboard Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution#Noticeboards. Smeagol 17 (talk) 11:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Smeagol 17, I've attempted that a while ago and just recently on WP:3O. Thank you for your advice. If you could chip in that'd be great of course but I don't want to bother you.FelipeFritschF (talk) 03:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Code-E novel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kejejejkekw — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.46.38.255 (talk) 04:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shaman King Marcos 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Future Boy Conan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toei.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fuc* you Akhunz (talk) 09:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Renat 09:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is this Indian editor who keeps disruptive editing on the article by removing sourced material and misplace false information.

His movie had a mere $40 million that is not even worth mentioning and he keeps reverting it and removing references.

2021 in film: Revision history

2021 in film

--74.119.196.50 (talk) 12:41, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 November 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Anti-satellite weapon, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 17:36, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe there is a need to present the Japanese Translation and the English Netflix tiles in full, especially when there are only a few instances. All of the English versions of Stands are indicated by Explanatory footnotes (efn). Unless you have a strong contrary argument, I propose the titles should be handled in the same way. Ozflashman (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ozflashman: Stands are stands, and episode names are episode names. This is handled like this not only on all other JoJo parts, but also on other pages like List of Dragon Ball Z episodes.Smeagol 17 (talk) 08:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I agree with you: the title is modified because it contains the name of a Stand and the List of Dragon Ball Z episodes are actually completely different titles which I agree is quite valid to list as well. If there are no further examples in JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Stone Ocean] then I suggest only 1 title is sufficient to identify the episode. Ozflashman (talk) 03:24, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ozflashman: Even in released episodes of Stone Ocean, there is more: see episodes 2 and 8. Smeagol 17 (talk) 07:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC) Smeagol 17 (talk) 07:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An issue has arisen at the Wagner Group article which you helped contribute in the past. Your opinion here would be appreciated [2] towards a possible resolution of the dispute. Thanks in advance for your input. EkoGraf (talk) 13:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Although it seems a compromise to the issue now may be on the horizon, but the dispute continues. EkoGraf (talk) 13:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Zero no Kiseki PSP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You See ja:サムライスピリッツ ネオジオコレクション, OK? --2001:B400:E2F8:A3A7:4D27:E48B:6230:B386 (talk) 00:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ao no Kiseki PSP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw your edit to Smaug. Another editor without discussion renamed all the (perfectly good) "XYZ (Middle-earth)" articles to "XYZ (Tolkien)" on the very disputable grounds that one shouldn't name articles in-universe. However, "Middle-earth" is certainly a thing in the real world, given the vast sales of Middle-earth books and films. Other editors are starting to stir so we may well reverse the undesirable and I think totally unhelpful and jarring change. Meanwhile, maybe don't spend too much time replacing the redirects, which still function perfectly well! All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will keep this in mind.

Smeagol 17 (talk) 11:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Yamato 2520, 1, LD Cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Space Battleship Yamato 2205,Takeoff Poster.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diplomatic uniform, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Court uniform and dress.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you happen to have the source for the last edit you made about that cancellation? Thanks! Crosswrm (talk) 23:12, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this counts as a source you can put in wikipedia, but see https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/59628494-pretty-boy-detective-club-manga-volume-3 and then https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1647290775/.

I think the right approach would be to leave it blank then. Stating that it was cancelled is a strong statement without good sources. Crosswrm (talk)

I am not against that, but leaving an ISBN with a blank date gonna look a bit weird, I would say. Smeagol 17 (talk) 20:53, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hao Asakura.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello the IP's engaged in povpushing have been blocked, but the user keep pushing his agenda with other IP. The user did not reach consensus on the talk page. Why are you doing edit warring too? Do you have a link? Alkse2 (talk) 08:47, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have a reliable source for this information (the times of Israel article). And it was included on this page for many years, before it was deleted for some reason (the reason, as far as I can tell from the talk page, being "I don't want it to be included " - not very persuasive). If you reach consensus that this needs to be excluded, then so be it, but you haven't done it yet. Smeagol 17 (talk) 11:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus was to reject the povpushing. Please respect consensus.--Alkse2 (talk) 17:09, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Show me where the consensus on the talk page is to remove a long-standing reliable source on Prigozhins ethnic background. Smeagol 17 (talk) 17:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the povpushing that passed by IP twenty minutes before the protection of the article in a dishonest fashion. Povpushing is a violation, delete it. Alkse2 (talk) 09:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If your friends don't look at what they revert, it is not my problem. They should be more attentive. Smeagol 17 (talk) 09:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Netrunner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netrunner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Skylerblue77 (talk) 06:05, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Hо̄rai has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 9 § Hо̄rai until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! :) I am just asking because I am testing it, but when you edited Cyberpunk (role-playing game) on October 5 did you see a little yellow box above the editing field? BOZ (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't remember. Probably not. Smeagol 17 (talk) 15:05, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, OK. Just testing to see how useful it will be to editors. :) BOZ (talk) 15:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nadia: The Secret of Blue Water, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nadia: The Secret of Blue Water, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Primium. I noticed that you recently removed sources from List of Shahed drones without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thanks. -- Primium (talk) 19:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Shahed drones. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

If you believe we should not abide by the MOS: for this particular article, please explain why on the article's talk page. -- Primium (talk) 22:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war? I didn't remove the reference in my latest edit, as you requested. Smeagol 17 (talk) 22:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad. I misread the changes. Thanks for the improvement and clearing up the issue. -- Primium (talk) 22:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Borgenland (talk) 15:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! There was a 1961-built (1959-launched) icebreaker named Leningrad and I intend to write an article about it one day. I have turned Leningrad (icebreaker) into a ship index page. Tupsumato (talk) 19:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Sorry for moving, then. Smeagol 17 (talk) 19:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem — it's good that someone is keeping an eye on unnecessary disambiguation. Tupsumato (talk) 19:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Smeagol 17!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Petit Eva.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chechen–Russian conflict, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FSB.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for many improvements to the article about the novel. Your first edit though, which you summarized with citation?, deletes a statement supported by the previous citation from the Moscow Times (see previous sentence). The essence of the statement is repeated twice in that article; when I went to the screening of the film the director himself repeated more than once the concept, so it seems important and encyclopedic. Therefore I'm going to add back the sentence

Russia's invasion of Ukraine halted distribution in 2022, because of the director's stance about the war.

If you feel that the citation has to be repeated please go ahead adding a tag to the previous citation and then referencing that tag. In addition, Wikipedia's guidelines are that when when an editor thinks that a citation is needed, there is a ^{[citation needed]} tag that can be added; in other words, omitting the tag, deleting the passage, and writing in the summary of the edit that a citation is needed is deprecated.--Gciriani (talk) 18:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe I was a bit hasty, but three things: 1) Probably better to add "according to director", as it is not a claim by the newspaper itself

2) Better to include this reference for the claim itself, it is not enough that it is used previously

3) I am not sure the mention of the delay needs to be here at all, and not just in the film article. Smeagol 17 (talk) 15:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nononono.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Space Battleship Yamato 2205,Takeoff Poster.jpg
• File:Attack on Titan Season 4 vol 1.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 22:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Penguin Highway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kadokawa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Attack on Titan Season 4 vol 1.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 14:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Xellos TR.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Attack on Titan Season 4 vol 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 00:39, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why only this (season 4) image rationale is disputed? It is the same as others. Smeagol 17 (talk) 07:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also submitted those images for deletion. — Ирука¹³ 07:21, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, do we need to contact the photographers to get their permission? Smeagol 17 (talk) 08:48, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of the possibilities. An easier option would be to upload a 2D image. — Ирука¹³ 09:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope they compose what they have done on the page. 2806:250:414:BED0:492F:E29E:FAD:1DA6 (talk) 22:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]