I think that's a great idea! You should do that. (Just use Y=Lx(A)^23x) Let me know how it works.--Coffee 12:43, 07 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For previous entries, see User talk:Perfecto/Archive 1

Umm supposedly I posted something on the macromedia flash article in 2005 and u thought i was spam? I dont think I ever have edited that article, so I dont remember that. Thanks for the pointless user talk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamlost456 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WAS NOT spam and WAS NOT a link to my Private page either... it was actually a link I came across that was intersting and HIGHLY related to the development of SkyOS...

Ok, this is the second time I will ask you nicely to change your current flag image that is used in your signature to Image:Flag of Canada.svg. We only need to have one copy of the Canadian flag on Wikipedia. There was a bot who went around and changed all canadian flag images to the one I pointed out to, so we only have to have one Canadian flag image. With you using the "perfecto icon" in your sig, you have added another Canadian flag to the project, which is redundant. I ask you, sir/madam, to take action and change the icon to Image:Flag of Canada.svg. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire) Fair use policy} 07:16, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I assure you the link wasn't included for selfish motives. In fact, I have no connection to them, except that I have used and like their free (as in beer) software. I didn't bother to check if it was free software (as in speech). As it turns out, the link existed on that page before my edit...I've reverted my edit, secure in the knowledge that that piece of software is in fact listed.--Joel 01:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

70.24.212.140, the "spammer", is me. Those links are not spam. :-) --unforgettableid | talk to me 04:03, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Dead-end pages
• Wikipedia:Orphaned Articles
• Special:Shortpages
• Category:Articles needing their notability explained
• Category:Suspected hoaxes
• Category:Possible copyright violations
• Category:Articles lacking sources
• Category:Articles which may be unencyclopedic
• Category:Articles which may contain original research
• Category:Biographies without real biographical information
• Category:Wikipedia articles needing context
• Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification
• Category:Wikipedia articles that need their importance to be explained

Please see discussion page of Kogut programming language and Konwert countryhacker 22:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You stated that the band is unverifiable, yet they maintain a website and have a page on the Spanish Wikipedia. They meet the "national tour" criteria for notability for bands as mentioned on the talk page. Perhaps we should do a disambig page rather than simply delete the article on the band? Fightindaman 03:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ummm, i wasnt advertising anything i was just putting up a shock site in the shock sites section. thanks for sending me an irrellavent message about something that was in its rightful place. would you have rather me put it in the external links for something that it wasnt even relate to. its people like you who ruin wikipedia for others just wanting to put things in their rightful place. at least im not spamming random websites or just defacing articles.

Wow! You're right! It's amazing what turns people on isn't it! I've thinking of starting a category for Watching Paint Dry - all the related articles would describe and discuss the different colours of paint and how long it takes each one to dry. SilkTork 16:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two of my entries have been removed as spam. I just wanted to point out two things:

1. I added a product I am currently working on (a Workflow management suite), to a list ALREADY full of commercial products. I am NOT going to put it back on the page. I don't care about my company's marketing :-) I am sorry for this spam, but the list in the article was already (and still is) full of commercial products, so I thought I was not spamming at all.

2. An external link to budterence.tk was removed as spam. Why? That is the biggest source (and my favourite fan site) about Bud Spencer and Terence Hill (italian actors). Why would it fall under Spam? I don't understand.

Filini | Talk to me | 2006-02-07 6.36PM

1. Again, sorry for the spam. I was researching for my project at work, and when I saw the big commercial list, I thought "Why not my product, too?" :-) I promise I won't do it again.

2. My fault... since budterence.tk was in the same headline as the other spam, I thought you had it removed, as well :-) Unfortunately I won't be a big contributor. I prefer contributing with text only when I'm 100% sure - and I'm not a good trusted source about anything :-P I just wanted to give the best (IMHO) reference about the actor in the article.

Filini | Talk to me | 2006-02-07 6.54PM

As I told "Ichiro", I didn't realize that linking to content that relates to the subject matter was a violation of Wikipedia policy. Please accept my humble apology.

If there's a way to include content and get credit for the entries, please let me know.

(sorry, I am not good with making headlines and stuff) I am deeply sorry for my link to a website ("battlemaster", just to give you a clue about what I am talking about), I hadnt read the rules.

Again - sorry, it shall not happen again

regards,

Eirik

In reaction to your comment on my userpage discussion I installed the Opera browser and it acts completely as a Bittorrent cliënt. You can download and share bittorrent files with it. Op.mijn.werk 14:39, 9 February 2006 (UTC) ==TvRage Relivance==[reply]

Please see my comments on the talk page of that article re your recent edit and modify as appropriate if you wish. Otherwise I'm happy to modify your change. Kymara 11:31, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it's me again, Shinobi101. My article that I wrote on a band has been deleted. The reason for this was (supposedly) "hoax or band vanity." What the frick does this crap mean? -Shinobi101 Feb 12, 16:38, 2006

Hi, you left some boiler-plate type message regarding "commercial links — or links to your own private websites" in my user talk. I'm not really sure if I'm supposed to respond in my talk area or in yours. Anyway, backup-manager isn't a commercial link or a private website of mine. I simply added links to backup software I found in the Debian repositories to provide a central point of information on backup software. I noticed there were some pretty good ones missing.

In regards to commercial links, there's a section on that page for "Proprietary" software. Even though I hadn't added any, this does imply that there could be links to commercial software.

The name of the band I wrote about was Trollkotze. I'm not sure why it would have been deleted so soon. -Shinobi101 15:30, Feb 13, 2006

I have figured out how to edit a page, however can find how to create a new article not attached to anything else.

I would like to give a fresh definition not already in wikipedia

Thank you Erik

Perfecto. Actually saw your comments on the article 'Babyrina' article awhile back. You are were right about something...the entry was something personal. Let just say it was a spontaneous outburst of...something personal. You don't know how it feels like to be ruled by a bunch of hypocritical Neo-Nazis cum Pseudo-Taliban. Anyway, I'll be nominating for the 'babyrina' entry to be deleted/removed. Ciao and have a nice day. Babyrina2 06:27, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, i am too lazy to review them. i am leaving it up to the users of wikitionary to handle that. anyway, it has a clear disclaimer that it is a dump. -- Zondor 09:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it's alright. we're all part of the same sister projects arent we? these very short articles can only go towards the wiktionary project. people come onto wikipedia thinking it is an dictionary as well. people over here also have to put up with these "garbage" dictionary entries that keep popping as well. wikipedia is not a dictionary. assume good faith. wiktionary should appreciate all these new contributions that wikipedia attracts. -- Zondor 10:07, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

regarding the deletion log. firstly, these are definately not good enough for wikipedia and so are given to wiktionary. if its not good enough for wiktionary, then its not good enough for wikimedia. simple as that. -- Zondor 10:16, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time and methods engineering. --Spangineer (háblame) 12:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Perfecto, The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workflow also has a reference link to Captaris.com

If you are considering I am spamming, Could you please remove it as well then?

I read the article and thought I know of this other product, so I would add and contribute to the wiki.

rules are for everyone.

Hey Perfecto. A little while ago, you added "{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega Directive}}" to Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2006_February_20. That dicussion was held and closed a month ago (the article was deleted), so I went ahead and removed it from today's log on the assumption that you just made some sort of wikitypo. I just thought I should let you know, in case you had intended to nominate a different article with a similar name or something like that. --Aaron 02:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I understand no commercial links have to stand on wikipedia. However, edgewall releases trac as an OpenSource product. So linking it to edgewall is AMHA as bad as putting a link to www.novell.com on the suse linux wikipedia article... But okay, I'll try and be carefull next time :)

Tnorth 11:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You told me that links to the commercial websites is bad and should not be used in the articles. Why you opposite me in my deletions?

crea7or

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ShixxNOTE What you think about it?

Hi

This link : Andrea VITALI : Tarots - Art and Magic Reference Wikipedia France [18]

is systematically deleted. by Dream Guy.

I cannot go on with this unilateral "deleting" stuff done without any discussion.

Best regards

Alain Bougearel alainbougearel@club.lemonde.fr

Nota bene

I had already explained that the link wasn't self promotion or commercial link on my precedent post :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bougearel#bougearel.blog.lemonde

If it was self-promotion, then why not delete for the same purpose the link to Villa Rewak about the History fact Sheet?

THE TarotL HISTORY INFORMATION SHEET

http://www.villarevak.org/misc/tarotl_1.html

The case is exactly similar : Tarots - Art and Magic http://bougearel.blog.lemonde.fr/bougearel/2005/12/tarots_art_et_m.html

It is distinctly interesting that those at SEW want to pollute wikipedia with links to their own sites of interest and profit, while distinctly overreacting and assuming that every link put in their forums is there for subversive purposes of self promotion of the poster. And yet they try to do it to you. I am awed!

-SmallFry

Thanks for the keeping a watchful eye on User:Returnonaffiliate. It appears he has mistaken Wikipedia for a marketing tool. Monkeyman^(talk) 13:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello -- you may wish to check the Adium talk page. I'm surprised that you added a notability template to the page, and I would appreciate your explanation. -- dcclark (talk) 16:26, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe that this is in fact James O'Brien. I Think this is someone masquerading as him.

JamieHughes

Please let me know, do I have right to add this link: http://www.cezeo.com/tips-and-tricks/windows-messenger/ to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Messenger_Service ?

I have removed my ad banner from this page to not annoy you :) Is it suitable for this article?

--Crea7or 23:43, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Really interesting project ( wikibooks ).--Crea7or 20:23, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say I'm surprised, but I am disappointed. All those Keeps, and we're still removed. Not only by a dead rule (which appears to be missing a 0, as I recall it was top 100,000), but because dispite all the arguments presented didn't get everyone to agree at once on the same thing. So I don't know what to think. So now what? JohnQ.Public 09:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TVRage is under 20,000 now on Alexa. Can it come back now? Amaas120 03:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I work for SYSPRO, and I'd like to put in a company description and a description of our great enterprise business software solution. I've taken out all advertising and public relations and have just kept the facts. I've also added a source note, but it still says that it needs to be "wikified". Can you help me to "wikify" it?

Thank you! Dawna Heising dawna.heising@us.syspro.com

Since you deleted an article I posted, I thought you would be a good person to explain this to me. I wrote an article about the company I work for, BizXchange, and you removed it, however, I find many company articles on the site like this one:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_Development

So how do they get there? Is it required that somebody outside the company writes it or something? I just don't understand the reasoning here. Would you please explain? mailto:leife@bizx.com

I've replied on my talk page. Thanks!~ :)

— Adrian~enwiki (talk) 01:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perfecto, stop being selective then in who you allow to post. Our site is no different than several others that are appearing on the page, yet somehow their "commercial" links seem acceptable. You need to stop "selectively censoring" various sites and following a uniform policy. If you don't, then you yourself are responsible for the backlash against you.

"Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Crossflo systems, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! --Perfecto Canada 04:58, 11 February 2006 (UTC"

Hi Perfecto. Thanks for your message regarding submiting copyrighted text (above).

I'd like to add a page on a technology company, similar to what has been done for many companies such as Tibco.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TIBCO

I tried to do this before but was told not to accept copyrighted material. What am I doing wrong?

I don't have any independent evidence that it exists. I believed the article. The external links seem to confirm it. moink 21:51, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you delete my link to PHPfileNavigator, an Open Source and non commercial application that is directly related with a discussion (File Manager List in web section). The web link is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:80.58.15.235

You added {{notability}} to GanttProject. To me (based on Wikipedia:Notability (software)) it looks notable. Therefore I removed the notice, and put a note about its notability on the talk page. I hope thats okay. Bawolff 20:19, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regardin your contribution to kung-fu chess: I saw you added 2 links in order to avoid deletion. Where does it state in wikipedia guidelines that this avoids deletion? (tried searching and didn't find).

Thanks, Ron

The article List of shock sites has been nominatied for deletion again. I noticed that during its past nominations for deletion you voted to have the article deleted. If you have time, please support me in my attempt to have this article deleted by casting your vote in favour of deletion. Thank you. - Conrad Devonshire 07:24, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: Wikipedia:Sign_your_posts_on_talk_pages#Images_and_Appearance, thanks, ed g2s • talk 12:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:06, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am member of Dutch Wikipedia :) I place soms interwiki :) Edwtie 18:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be anti-corporate wikisites, even if they are largely benign and informative, yet there are thousands of them on wikipedia. Please explain your objection. --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.55.52.10 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 20 June 2006

?Äʰ

Thanks for uploading Image:Celeste Holm.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs 13:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This image has been replaced by the public domain image Image:Celeste Holm in Gentleman's Agreement trailer.jpg Rossrs 13:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Mollela, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Matt 11:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jesus Christ Vampire Hunter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Arrowhead Spring Water logo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:12, 8 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:12, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ushiro_Ukemi_per_Shinken_Shobu_waza.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 23:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Medal of Honor - Underground.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. « ₣ullMetal ₣alcon » 15:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Rocket Riders, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocket Riders. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Johnny Au (talk) 01:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Larisa Oleynik, 10 Things I Hate About You.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:15, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:StephanieBeard-CarlosBustamente-YTVZone.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tamsin's Weatherpixie self-portrait.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is The Skeptic's Annotated Bible. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Skeptic's Annotated Bible (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Spiral zone logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cleanup-spam has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 16:21, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notability has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yahoo directory has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:10, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cleanup-spam has been nominated for merging with Template:Advert. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  19:11, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yahoo directory has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 23:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Yahoo directory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rocket Riders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocket Riders (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 02:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Discuss links here has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:08, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]