• A Wikipedia page says that particular professors at respected universities are using the standard jargon of their fields only to create a false impression of legitimacy.
• The same page says that those professors do not publish in respected scientific journals when in fact they do.
• The same page says those professors do not collaborate with colleagues not belonging to a particular organization when in fact they do.

I thought these were libelous, but the decision on the Administrators' Noticeboard is they are not, and that it is abusive for me to say that they are, and it is profoundly shameful that someone who thinks these things are libelous is allowed to be an administrator, and I am clearly paranoid if I think they are libelous, and I am unbelievably stupid and cannot understand anything if I think they are libelous, and proceedings to take away my status as an administrator are clearly needed if I think these things are libelous.

That's how Wikipedia works. Michael Hardy (talk) 02:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)