BoyTheKingCanDance 171,000+ This user has made over 171,000 edits, even though he thinks this is a rather meaningless statistic. Quality counts, not quantity This user has new page reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify) 5 This user has visited 5 of the 205 countries in the world. This user speaks Arabic, Dari, Bengali, Gujarati, Urdu, Farsi, Punjabi, English. This user is a member of the Guild of Copy Editors. This user is a Sunni Muslim. الله This user believes in one God called Allah. This user intends to do Hajj. This user prays. حلال This user observes the dietary laws of Halal. This user respects the beliefs and religions of others. C2H5OH-0 This user is a non-drinker. This user does not smoke. This user plays chess. This user is a recent changes patroller. This user strives to maintain a policy of neutrality on controversial issues. This user is a participant in WikiProject Pakistan.

Assalamu alaykum and hello. I love "new page reviewing". I also enjoy copy editing articles for clear expression and hopefully improved consistency. I have a wide range of interests, but seem mainly to edit articles related to my homeland Pakistan and to Islamic scholars and scholarship. I feel disappointed by entries that contain no references or that contain references which do not actually support the claims attributed to them (which is sadly common). I often delete blocks of unreferenced material. I also work hard to keep articles neutral, which is sometimes frustratingly difficult, especially when dealing with Islamic topics.

I used to frequently update Rotten Tomatoes ratings which were seriously out of date, but I haven't been able to find much time for this lately. I am also keen to reduce the excessive use of the honorifics / titles which clutter some pages (Sir, Lord, Hon., Dr, Rev, Hon, Sheikh, Maulana, Imam, Mufti, Sardar, Sayyid, Janab, Khawaja, Hajji, etc).

In good faith, I sometimes cut down long, unfocused and waffling articles, basing my edits on the wikipedia guidelines on including too much detail and on the wikipedia guideline on “being bold” while editing. I also sometime remove trivial information from pages. If I get it wrong in an article you’ve created or edited, or I revert you for what seems to be an invalid reason, please assume my good faith, contact me, and highlight your objection. To quote the Beatles, “we can work it out”.

The new page review is one of the last approval stages. So when I see a page with huge amounts of unreferenced information, and no {{In use}} tag to show that the page is undergoing a major build, I tend to err on the side of caution and remove the unreferenced information. The easiest solution is for you to add the tag to indicate the page is under construction. This prevents me and other editors from editing the page until the process is complete and the tag is removed. Please assume good faith of me, as I do of you.