Froglegs.jpg This image of Frog legs serves to illustrate the cultural obstacles that Westerners may encounter in Chinese Cuisine. It also serves as an illustration of a proper serving of frog legs...meaning to clarify what cooked frogs legs may look like (unlike most Western perceptions that cooked frogs legs are green and so forth). Thank you for your time.Ram32110 03:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

I think the image Kano_BD.jpg which you tagged falls under the category of 'fair use'. It's a still from a movie intended for promotional use (as the source I got it from is an official site). I don't know how to change the image's tag, however... Captain Q 16:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Check my answer at the Maria Spiropulu discussion page Omnium 1 January 2006

This particular image can be found in many different websites, I just refered to the original location, and if you search with Yahoo for images of Maria Spiropulu, you'll read that this image can be subject to copyright. Doesn't that allows me to use it in my article to? --Omnium 17:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

The image i uploaded is created by me i also linked the files source it's from my gallery website so please don't delete them. Thank you--50cent4 09:21, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that in mid-December you moved Medusa (Annie Lennox album) to Medusa (1995 album). I don't really understand your reason, "why change a well referenced article", but anyway, the guidelines on naming music album articles is that when disambiguation is necessary, it is done by artist name and not year of release. See WP:ALBUM#Style. I'm going to go ahead and move it back and clean up the links etc, I just thought I'd let you know what the convention is on this. --Qirex 14:38, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Those images were not taken from the public image gallery of SWRT but from the media gallery.But also after emailing SWRT media manger now i know that they're no press release promotianal photos either. Thanks for your concern.If there's a quick way to remove these images,please let me know.

Cloverleaf 14:40, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:Petter Solberg 02.jpg, Image:Petter Solberg 01.jpg, Image:Chris Atkinson 01.jpg, Image:Tommi Makinen 01.jpg, Image:Ari Vatanen 02.jpg, Image:Ari Vatanen 01.jpg, Image:Colin McRae 01.jpg, Image:Colin McRae 02.jpg

They are all now deleted. Thanks! JesseW, the juggling janitor 00:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Will do in the future.--Wotwu 06:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

The format can be changed on citing restaurants. Let me know. But since you have an article such as "Krystal (restaurant) — second oldest fast food chain in the United States, founded in 1932" I believe such restaurants above should not be deleted. Part of history.

I am confused by the comment (assume it is a vandal?) and fascinated by how users like yourself pick up these entries (any clues would be appreciated?). Anyway thank you for the revert VirtualSteve 11:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for information on CryptoDerk's Vandal Fighter (CDVF). I will use it myself. Cheers! VirtualSteve

Last comment agreed with already - just read the program details and thought "I would rather be editing". I will leave the vandals to others - far too much to do. Thanks again VirtualSteve 11:25, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting back my profile page. Why do people vandalize? I find it even more insulting to vandalize a fellow wikipedian userpage versus a encylopedia entry. As for Arabian Goggle I made him/her/it a watchlist priority.Paul.Paquette

Thanks buddy i owe yah one! BTW i've got a good reason to believe Arabian Google is a socketpuppet of User:Cooliomccool, since i'd recently helped in banning that guy! अमेय आर्यन DaBroodey

Greetings Feydey. Did I do something wrong in adding mention of "phosphor thermometry" to "Laboratory thermometers"? Thanks. Steve 00:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Other users may edit pages in your user space, although by convention your user page will usually not be edited by others. So you see it is not against rules. Luka Jačov 10:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply with regard to "laboratory thermometers". There are many different, specialized thermometry techniques that are used in laboratories throughout the world. Phosphor thermometry is one of those techniques and one with which I have some familiarity. So I thought it might be an appropriate fit for the laboratory thermometer category. I'd like to submit again sometime and would take greater care when doing so.Steve 13:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Do you want me to give the direct link or is it OK to just give domain? I stated that it was taken by "Faruk from www.wowturkey.com" in summary, should I move it to copyright section?

Btw wowturkey is moving to another server, so it is unviewable. I am a member of wowturkey.com, and wowturkey.com allows anyone to use the images uploaded to its server, as long as they state it is from wowturkey.com. There are many other photos from wowturkey in Wikipedia, which were accepted. System Halted 07:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

-- The site is back but most of the pages are missing. I will be adding pages about copyrights as soon as they become avaible. Btw when we say "Copyrighted but free to use for any purpose", does it mean you can use it by not refering to photographer/site? In order to make photographer/site to be refered as a neccesity shall use ((Attribution)) tag? Thank you --System Halted 16:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

3)Oh. I meant other people who might grab image from wikipedia, while saying Btw when we say "Copyrighted but free to use for any purpose", does it mean you can use it by not refering to photographer/site?. So if a site is asking for its link to be published in order to use it, I must mark it with {{cc-by-2.0}} tag? Right? --System Halted 17:50, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi. I put link to domain for picture I upload, and now I put direct link to web page where it is from. Thanx for care, --Moravek 18:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

I allowed Luka Jačov to make those changes. Moreover, not only they don't seem to be forbidden by Wikipedia... but I encourage people to make improvements in my user page :D. Anyway, thank you for your attention. --GTubio 00:42, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Hello,

I got the image from their official site under their promo picture section. I'm not too sure where you need me to put the information on where I got it from. Can you please help me out or at least tell me where to look on how to set it up? thanks.

Thank you, feydey, for your support of my RfA. If you ever need for anything, please contact me. I will do my best in my new role and welcome your feedback. NoSeptember ^talk 14:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support during my RfA! The community has decided to make me an administrator, and there's work to be done. I look forward to seeing you around the project in the future, and if you see me do anything dumb, let me know right away! Regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 23:28, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi Feydey/Talk archive 2, thanks for participating in my RfA discussion. Unfortunately, my fellow Wikipedians have decided at this time that I am not suitable to take on this additional responsibility, as the RfA failed with a result of 66/27/5 (71.0% support). If you voted in support of my request, thank you! If you decided to oppose me at this time, then I hope that if I do choose to reapply in the future, the effort I will make in the meantime to improve and expand my contributions to Wikipedia may persuade you to reconsider your position. All the best, Proto t c 10:27, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

I did as you requested and found a source for the Uzice.jpg image. The only trouble I'm having is what would the licence be, if the author shares the image, and puts no copyright information on his site? Besides that, his site has a whole lot of copyrighted images that he didn't create, and he gives no credit. I wouldn't be surprised if he actually stole the image. Can you help me with the licencing for this? - Thanks

While reading your post, I honestly haven't found exactly what issue you have with the image. When I posted the image I listed it as a television licence, and even stated in the image discription that the photo is property of The WB, and that it was a promotional photo of actress Holly Marie Combs for their series Charmed. If you want me to specify the source of where I originally recieved the image, I will place it on the page. Outside of that, please be more clear as to what additional information you need for the image to remain. Thank you. Artemisboy 00:02, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• I've looked over the various tags and agree with you that the image is not a screen shot but a promotional photo released through The WB. Hence, I've added the Promophoto template to the image page. I've also listed the website (the WB.com) as being the source of where I originally recieved the photo. If there is any additional information needed for the image, please let me know. I am relatively new to Wikipedia and am in the process of learning the proper formats. Any help you could offer would be most greatly appreciated. Thank you. Artemisboy 00:15, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Ok, I've added a link to the direct page The WB offers the images to fans to download. This is where I previously recieved the image three years ago. If there is still not sufficient information for the image to remain on the site, I sadly submit to its wanted deletion. Artemisboy 00:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Thanks for all your help Feyday. I really appreciate it. I chose that picture because I just think she looks beautiful in it. I guess I could chose another one, but for some reason the one I posted just screamed "This one is SO much better than the one used before. Please post me." LOL. I guess I'll keep my fingers crossed on this one and hope for the best. Should it be deleted though, I'll have to use another one that is more obvious to post. Thanks again. Artemisboy 00:59, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I dont really understand your message. This image is a promotional image just like the others on the Eurovision 2006 page and I have written in the summary that it is a Promotional Picture for a certain country and after it I have provided a link to the source of the image, which in this case is the record company of this entrant. In the summary of this picture I have written: Danish Euovision Entry - Promotion - http://www.coronamusic.dk. This is also listed as a Promotional picture below and it is fair use for the use in promoting the entry. Evilperson 20 03:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Here is the image http://www.coronamusic.dk/index.php?linkid=21&imagekat=Sidsel,_studiefotos_1&imageid=24 ...the page is not in english but these are studio photos that are used for promotional purpose of the Danish Eurovision Entry. Evilperson 20 03:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I edited the summary. Evilperson 20 13:20, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

The image source is on the page...

• http://dzpj.en.alibaba.com/product/50063552/50287920/Braised_Chicken/Braised_Chicken.html Ram32110 04:30, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

What does promotional mean? Doesn't it promote the restuarant by exhibiting one of its finest dishes? Ram32110 03:55, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• • Never Mind...I have e-mailed The Age editors and am waiting for their input. Thank you. Ram32110 04:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for watching the Biden article and doing your editing. These comments are increasingly out of control. I know this isn't the first article to receive this kind of treatment (or worse), and am looking around for successful models of how other editors have successfully dealt with this. Any ideas where I might find something useful? stilltim 13:41, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

You listed a number of image warning notices under Parys's user page. She's blanked them all. Crumbsucker 02:33, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Nona b&w-2.jpg.

2/14/06: Update: I spoke today via email with Ms. Hendryx's manager, Vicki Wickham, in NYC. She confirmed that her management company owns the image and we have permission to use it. Therefore, the image is owned by Take Out Productions, 630 – 9th Avenue, Suite 216, New York, NY 10036.

Am I correct in assuming that this situation fits under the "open content" category, or, if not, please specify which category and please direct me to an example or template to follow, and I will get the complete information from Take Out Productions.

Thanks very much, Mike Bailey stonestroke2003@yahoo.com

I really don't think I can get any more specific then it was issued by the Honolulu Police Department as the source of the photo. I've just included the website operated by the Honolulu Police Department if that is what you are asking for. --Masssiveego 04:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

"This is a copyrighted image that has been released by a company or organization to promote their work or product in the media, such as advertising material or a promotional photo in a press kit"

I believe that the entire idea behind the website was to promote the police work done by Lee Donohue, and I feel your request to delete a public record photograph that has been released to both the media and the public by HPD is incorrect. May I however get instructions on how to delete questionable photographs? --Masssiveego 01:06, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm still relatively new to this photography image thing, please bear with me as I adjust to this format. If I were to take a digital camera and photograph Lee Donohue, would that count as fair use? --Masssiveego 01:23, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

The mattserra.jpg photo i found is from his website serrajitsu.com it is a website of his brazilian jiu jitsu academy used for promotion. His photo that i used is found in the fighter section. Anything else i need to include to keep hte picture up? (i am a student of his as well) thank you. Tristram

Hello,

I read the message you sent me about the Santana Moss Image, and I thought that if you put where you got the picture from (like the URL) then that is how you tell people that you didn't produce the image your self and that is where you came across the picture.

Thank you, ~Ranix

I saw you tagged this article. Is there any reason it shouldn't be nn-bio'd? Cheers, JackyR 08:45, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

On second thoughts, I have listed it for deletion (follow links from Nathan Sellyn), per "WP is not a crystal ball". Cheers, JackyR 23:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for working on the list of notable books, moving articles where needed, but the goal of the project, like all WP:MEA projects is to ultimately reduce the list to zero, so adequately covered books should be removed not moved to the lower list. You may have noticed I reverted your updated counts we count both blues and reds in the count. I'm sorry to have correct your well intentioned work, but the section title "Unverified blue links" means that someone hasn't gone through yet to make sure that the blue link actually covers the book in question. While the list was created a while ago, it has not seen as much work as other "notable" lists such as the film and album list. If you have any other questions feel free to ask. Thanks, --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 23:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Looks like it doesn't say "Unverified". I will have to fix that. Thanks again for you contributions and sorry for the mixup. --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 23:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your question, hopefully I can answer it without providing you even more confusion. The objective of the list is to be whittled down to zero by covering the red linked articles and removing the blue ones. The way that I have worked with list like these is to add comments to blue links that should not be removed (covers a different topic), while removing items that have been adequately covered (article covers item in question) [1]. This way people know if someone has "checked" that article and can work on other items. When "enough" verified items have accumulated in the unverified lists, they items may be moved around [2]. This is at your discretion. You can create a separate section, keep it in unverified blue links, whatever works for you. The only organizing principle is to only remove valid blue links and make red links blue. You can arrange things how they best work for you (be bold), it will likely work for someone else. Please note some lists require an infobox, or categorization, this only requires and article. If the article is less than a paragraph long, I usually add "expand before removal". I hope that helps, if not, feel free to ask. I will do some example edits on the list to show you what I mean.

As far as the numbering, it always lags behind, but should be regularly updated (though not frequently, like after every removal). --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 15:05, 1 March 2006 (UTC) Updated 15:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CARE

BUT I REALLY USED DHAMMAKAYA FOUNDATION PICTURE ,AND I AM DHAMMAKAYA FOUNDATION,S MEMBER TOO.

PHILOTHAI

Thanks again sir.

I used picture from * [[3]] philothai

Thanks you sir for your care ,maybe I missunderstand about this .so I will be deleted it. PHILOTHAI

SORRY SIR.

PLEASE HELP ME DELETED THIS PICTURE TOO. BECAUSE I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW TO DELETED IT.

THANK YOU

PHILOTHAI

I have no idea what you are talking about. I clearly mentioned the source of the photos were from the U.S. government and therefore are in the public domain. Speciffically, the images are screen caps from videos released by the U.S. White house itself. Please remove your tags from the pics. Thanks!

More info has been added. --Jayzel 15:52, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your kindness.

philothai

I'm puzzled. (Oops, sort of sounds like Biden at the Alito confirmation hearings.) What was removed, his hair plugs, his shame at plagarism, or an attempt at editing a piece? four shoes

February 23, 2006

Hi,

I see that you have deleted the image of Nona Hendryx from her page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nona_Hendryx

I thought that I did everything correctly. I listed the photographer's name, the year it was taken, and the copyright owner, Take Out Productions, NYC. Can you please tell me what it is that I did wrong?

Thanks, Mike stonestroke2003@yahoo.com

Im sorry but I did not find those images on the website you specified. I found them when on Yahoo! Image search.

But I'm serious. I found them on this website, http://www.ffshrine.org/ff8/ff8_nomuraart.php and http://www.ffshrine.org/ff8/ff8_renderedart.php and these two websites clearly state that "You're free to use any of FFShrine's media on your sites". And I found some of those pictures here, http://www.ffcompendium.com/low/art.shtml and this website states nothing of any copyrights and so forth. And I found a few here too, http://heeya.oolim.net/ff8-charactor.htm and this website is in another language with no copyright signs at the bottom nor the top.

Sure. Thanks. But does this mean all the pictures I uploaded previously are going to be deleted?

Okay, it's uploaded again with all the info I have. If the Admin. people don't like it, I'm uploading another one to see if we have any better luck with that.

Thanks, Mike

Just in regard to the above uploaded images:

I understand where you're coming from, and I've changed the relevant ones, but the sites I've provided should be sufficient enough.

afl.com.au releases the photos, and as a local newspaper writer, I've used their resources countless numbers of times with no qualms regarding the copyright legalities. It, generally speaking, is a press release photo, but there doesn't seem to be a category anymore..

As for those gathered from the online sites of newspapers, nowhere does there seem to be any legal issues regarding copyright. If you're looking for all this specific info outlines in several places here, you're looking for something that cannot be found, in my opinion. Definitely, if the specified photographer was noted, then yes, he needs to be included, but nowhere can this be found for the above images.

Appreciate some further info if problems persist. Boomtish 06:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I've been asked to help by User:Omegasaid. You have left a boilerplate message on his talk page regarding the copyright tagging of Image:CCGenerals.jpg, the message is somewhat confusing as that image is tagged (and was tagged at the time of you tagging nosource) as a fair use game screenshot. The message you give implies that this is sufficient. I'm no expert on image copyright issues so can you please clarify to User:Omegasaid what is lacking. Thanks --pgk^(talk) 13:21, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Answer here: User_talk:Omegasaid. feydey 23:20, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

about the Petter Hegre photo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Petterhegre.jpg , it's from a press kit, so it may be distributed (you can contact Hegre's webmaster at newnudecash about this). Do I need to confirm anything to keep the picture? greetz

Why did you dispute the article I wrote? The reason didn't make any sense to me. Something like "Not a notable internet game clan" -Huo_Ma_Ke (Article was Quarryists)

What exactly did you mean? Do I have to find a specific respond from the group allowing me to upload their image on wikipedia???

Thank you for supporting me in my request for adminship! It ended with a tally of 39/5/4, and I am now an admin. I'm glad to have earned the trust of the community, and I will make use of it responsibly. Of course, you can let me know of any comments or concerns you have.

With a million articles in front of me, I'd better get mopping.

rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 05:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

hello, feydey. i have no sources because I personally took the screenshots myself and added them. i didn't get them from any sites in order to add sources for them. please do not add tags because i don't want the pics to get deleted, the source is ME. thanks again. contact me to let me know if you have any other troubles. - Zarbon

Mikeetc 00:05, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi, sorry to bother you. I have uploaded several images, which are publicity photos of actors from a BBC television programme. However i have had several messages from you saying that the uploaded images havent been sourced. I have included the appropriate tags for promotional/publicity photo, but i dont really know what to iclude for source. The items all state they are copyrighted to the BBC. do I need to state that in my rationale? They are all scanned photos, so i havent got them from the net. I had thought that publicity photo's were allowed by wikipedia.

I'd appreciate any help you can give

regards

shirly

(Gungadin 02:04, 4 March 2006 (UTC))

Hi, thanks for replying. They are copyrighted to the BBC, but so are so many other images that have appeared on wikipedia and they have been allowed to remain without these sourcing questions. The images im putting on are promotional autograph pictures that are sent out to anyone who requests them. I dont think they are possible to get on the net. I have had a look through those articles you sent me, but I cant see what else i'm missing out. Should i state that they are copyrighted to the BBC?

shirly

Hi ive added a URL for this image. can you have a look and tell me if this is adequate. Sorry for being a hassle

Image:HONEY EDWARDS00.jpg (Gungadin 02:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC))

Ok thanks. One last question. Even if the image says and shows that its copyrighted to the BBC at the bottom of the photo, is that still not eligible? Some of the images i uploaded have that and some do not.

(Gungadin 02:38, 4 March 2006 (UTC))

I got the photo from her web page at: : http://www.indiasplayhouse.com/hosted/racecar/?affiliate=960449 -- when I saved the first photo (1.jpg) for the web page screenshot, I was assuming it was fair use. Is this Ok, or is there something else that I am missing? (Arundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 19:27, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

OK, what is the difference between getting a photo from a web site and getting a screenshot, because most of the photos I see that are claimed as "screenshots" seem to be just sngle pictures and not shots of the whole webiste. I am sorry, but copyright law is my weak spot (most of the time I just scan a book or album cover and I think that is Ok, right?) Thanks for your help. (Arundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 12:49, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

OK, I appreciate the help. I think a lot of people may be confused about this, or either use that to get around licensing restrictions. I will do as you say. I did not mean to violate any law or policy. Thanks for clearing that up, but will likely stick to book covers for now! Amercian copyright law seems so complicated! Thanks again. (Arundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 13:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Did you delete the Quentin Tarantino article???????

I logged it to send this to you, however, I am never able to STAY logged in. I'm Dillonsmom13. Thanks, just wondering where he went

hi

Please can you elaborate what you mean about not deleting the 'image warnings'. Are you referring to the old messages on my talk page? I deleted those messages as they are old and the content that the messages refer to don't exist anymore, as i requested them to be deleted. Do these old messages have to stay on my talk page?

Gungadin 01:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

You've added a heap of image warnings for me and I just want to run through with you exactly what is wrong with the images I'm uploading and (if anything) what I can do to make them "okay"... I'm new to wikipedia and new to uploading images so bear with me!

Okay... first of all I've uploaded images from http://www.misshongkongpageant.com. The individual url of each image (which I admit I haven't included) is http://www.misshongkongpageant.com/usa2005s.jpg where the year is altered to reflect each Miss USA titleholder.

The summary I've given for each of these pictures is: Image taken from here: http://www.misshongkongpageant.com but original ownership is with the Miss Universe Organisation. This image is used by them to promote the Miss USA winner pictured.

Perhaps I should have added the exact url but what other information is missing? As far as I know the page the picture is on is simply a secondary source but as the images are in a suitable format for wikipedia I decided to use them. Other than assuming that the images come from the Miss Universe Organization, I do not know any more information about the actual pictures themselves. Another thing to add is that these official photos are used to promote the winners (as I indicated in the summary), and as such I believe they belong under fair use (promotion).

Secondly, Image:DE06.jpg (and others in the 'series')... again these are used to illustrate and promote the titleholder concerned. I just realise I forgot to put "from Paul Sirochman photography"... if I add this to the current summary will they be allowed? What else needs doing.

Thirdly, Image:RImain.jpg as I indicated this image was emailed to me and as such has no url and I don't know who it is from. There is no source of this photo on the web so far as I know, other than that which I have uploaded. Again, I believe it is a fair use of the image because the image is promotional (used to promote Leeann Tingley), so what else can I do?

Sorry to write you an essay! CarlyPalmer 00:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick reply and your suggestions. I've re-uploaded the first of the pictures and was wondering if you'd mind checking to see if I've done this properly: Jackie Loughery. I don't want to be too much of a pain but I want to make sure I'm doing it right before I bother sorting out the rest of them. Thanks again! CarlyPalmer 04:00, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi Feydey, I just noticed that you left a comment here quoting from WP:ICT that {{Attribution}} - For images that require attribution. --> Deprecated: consider using {{cc-by-2.0}}, below, instead. Luckily, the page now reads {{Attribution}} - For images that require attribution. For your own images, consider using {{cc-by-2.0}}, below, instead.

Probably you are aware of this now but just in case... changing an image's tag like this can only be done if you are the copyright holder. You can only ever license under CC-BY-2.0 (or any CC tag, for that matter) if the copyright holder explicitly states that they license the image that way.

Anyway cheers, it looks like you're fighting the good fight in relation to image copyright. I'm a Commons editor so I know it's an uphill battle!! pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:07, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

thank you for reminding me about uploading images.

I'm putting together an wiki of a local councilman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonspotz (talk • contribs)

Thanks Feydey/Talk archive 2

Thanks for your recent support on my RfA which passed 91/0/0. If you ever need anything, feel free to leave me a message! Gflores ^Talk 05:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm very confused as to why this picture was deleted from the page. I was replacing one that did not have a source. Does the picture not have the proper licensing as a screenshot? There are many other articles which have screenshots so I don't exactly know what's going on. Do I also need to include the link where I got this from? What exactly is the WP policy I am violating? --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 06:04, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. It makes sense, however in regards to what you pointed out, for future reference is that a definitive or merely a discussion? In the meantime, I'll look for a more appropriate screenshot of a film which is mentioned in the article. --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 06:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

... your multiple messages ("This media may be deleted."). I still don't enjoy them, and I still believe they are highly inadequate. This time I can elaborate on my usual answer by saying that already back in 2004 I stated that I had no idea about the source of the Udo Jürgens image. I still don't have a clue. If you use Google's image search ("Juhnke Jürgens Francesco") only that very image and a reference to Wikipedia are shown as results. The IMDb does not mention any film in which the three collaborated. Again: What can I do? And again: Please delete it if it makes you happy. Best wishes, <KF> 19:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

When you made this edit it removed the space at the beginning of the sortkey, putting the article after all the routes in the category. Please try to be more careful. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 07:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

• Gotta watch those spaces... feydey 07:38, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi Feydey! You tagged Image:Harrypotterandthegobletoffireposter.jpg as a speedy delete for being a duplicate of Image:GobletofFireUSposter.jpg. Whilst it is a poster from the same film, it isn't a duplicate, so it doesn't come under the Speedy Delete criteria you have chosen. If you still feel this image needs to be removed, please send it to Images for Deletion instead. If you need any help or advice, let me know. Cheers! ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 21:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Hey Feydey,

You left me a message on my images that they weren't properly attributed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JohnWm for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CMCBridges.jpg and two others.

I included the URL back to UCLA's site, but what more attribution/licensing should I attach?

I figure it's public domain for three reasons: 1) Promotional website source 2) created by a government agency (UCLA is a public school)

Thoughts? -John —Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnWm (talk • contribs)

Thanks for your posts regarding the Clayton Banks page. That bio that I posted is an official updated bio, and the alleged copyright violation is an aged bio posted by someone who doesn't represent him. The photo Banks.jpg is his official public headshot. I blanked out the page, because it is better that there be no bio, than one that is alleged to be a copyright violation. I appreciate Wikipedia's sensitivities regarding copyrights, and look forward to contributing into the future. Ben

This is sliat_1981. I recently uploaded Durham.jpg and Seekers.jpg. Seekers.jpg is from my Father's old magazine from the sixties, so the copyright status is well past date. Durham.jpg is a scan from my book.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sliat 1981 (talk • contribs)

The image Tfg.jpg was taken by me. I own the image, so leave it alone.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sliat 1981 (talk • contribs)

I uploaded this from another site. I asked them and they gave me permission to use it. I can give you the address if you want to ask them, so leave it alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sliat 1981 (talk • contribs)

I understand, but these images are not from the usa. The magazine is actually a program from their show called: 'Adrian Bohm Presents...Night Of Nights Live! The Seekers: Official Tour Program'. If you don't believe me, I can show you a photo of it if you like.

The other one is from the book, 'Colours Of My Life: The Judith Durham Story' by Graham Simpson. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sliat 1981 (talk • contribs)

Can you delete the image you just labeled for speedy deletion or find some one who is an administrator and can. It wasnt until it was uploaded I realised the error, I have since uploaded a new version of the image. Kyle sb 06:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Feydey, are you favor to me to change the licensing of the image Image:marcos_i.jpg from public domain to fair-in use, thank you.--Joseph Solis 06:19 UTC

I am now already changing the licensing of Image:marcos_i.jpg from public domain to fair-in use, Thank you. --Joseph Solis 06:32 UTC

I'm not sure why you removed the Nick Carter images? I thought we were allowed to use album covers (which all three of them were) if we refer to them in the caption and in the article? JackO'Lantern 06:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, it's pretty ambigious. I've seen album covers used to illustrate almost every artist. Check out Lindsay Lohan - it's a featured article! And has an album cover in it ("Speak"). JackO'Lantern 06:56, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

The WVIK contour map is FCC (US Government source) .. and is required for ALL US radio station licensee to be publicly "on-file" - per FCC regualtions. This is used for many Radio station postings (I have contributed and cleaned-up over 20 stations in the category). I can add the HTTP -- if that is what you desire - may have inadvertently been left off duirng upload. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatgr (talk • contribs)

Hi Feydey about the image or the images I will upload in the future is from my personal large archive all pictures have been taken from my personal sony digital camera ,please let me know the tag I must use ie {{GFDL-self}} and how. Kind regards and many thanks for your welcome message. Pireotis PS :Being a Greek islander have a to add about Greece as well with new pages of small Greek islands unknown yet to most of the foreign visitors of Greece.

Would you be as so kind as to delete that image? That was a mistake.

Feydey,

Thanks for helping me understand more of the proper use and etiquitte at Wikipedia. I apologize if I was breaking rules by deleting those warnings - I thought it was an incoming e-mail-like page. I emailed UCLA and obtained permission to use the photographs on wikipedia. Can you tell me what I should do now? I can't figure out any license like "permission granted by author".

-John

Here's the email, btw:

From: webprod NOSPAM@anderson.ucla.edu To: John Kilcline

Hi John,

It's all right to use images from our site.

Take care, Madeline Wright Web Production and Design

Quoting John Kilcline <john.kilcline. 2007NOSPAM@anderson.ucla.edu>:

> Hi there WebProd! > > I was checking out some wikipedia pages on Anderson, Sloan, and HBS > when I realized our page was sorely lacking pictures. > > Do you know if it would be possible to get approval to use our website > images on WikiPedia? Or can you point me at the right person to talk with? > > Best, > -John > HBS: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_Business_School> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_Business_School > > Sloan: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_Sloan_School_of_Management> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_Sloan_School_of_Management > > Anderson: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_School_at_UCLA> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_School_at_UCLA > (note: all pictures shown are about to be removed, until a license is > cleared) > > John Wm. Kilcline > MBA Class of 2007 > UCLA Anderson School of Management > john.kilcline. 2007NOSPAM@anderson.ucla.edu > > >

Where is this style stated that you speak of here? Cburnett 00:10, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Sorry i should have made it more clear it is a quote from the gallery that features here: [4], at the bottom of the page. Maybe there is another tag that applies to them but they are indefinatley public domain. Kingstonjr 18:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello, you have messaged me about images I uploaded not listing the creator. I corrected this on the first two images mentioned. You did however contact me on a third image that specifically states the artist of the image, as is the case with all subsequent images uploaded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjaminlwells (talk • contribs)

Regarding the article Image:Nguyen hop doan.JPG, which you tagged for speedy deletion with the reason "duplicate of Image:Col Nguyen Hop Doan.JPG", I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This article does not qualify for speedy deletion because duplicate images can only be speedily deleted if the other image is of higher or equal quality, see WP:CSD. If you still want the article to be deleted, please use the WP:IFD process. Thanks! Stifle 21:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi there I am the photographer of the spider image. I uploaded it myself. All are welcome to use it commercially or non commercially with credit to EJRS.COM I am unfamiliar with method of using templates etc. Can you guide me thru it please.

How do I add the source page of the image to image summary? Sorry, but I am not familiar with how it works. ejrs

It has been suggested by User:BrianSmithson and supported by User:Syrthiss that the Beer and brewery categories should be renamed. This proposal has been supported and expanded by myself. The notion is that the regional categories should follow the format of "Beer and breweries in Africa" /Europe/Asia/North America/South America/Oceania. "Brewers and breweries" could also be renamed "Beer and breweries by region". And all the countries should also be renamed (and merged if needed) as, for example, "Beer and breweries of Germany", "Beer and breweries of Britain", "Beer and breweries of Poland". The word in each case would be beer rather than beers to allow for general articles on beer culture in each region as well as individual beers.

Comments, suggestions, objections, free beer and simple votes to Wiki Beer Project SilkTork 15:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh, hello, you describe yourself as an Arbus fan. I'm a qualified fan of her myself. A fan in the best sense was (is?) Kikai Hiroh: without ever meeting him, she got him started. Sorry there aren't yet any photos in that article but for reasons that my fingers are now too tired to type I don't want to resort to "fair use" and haven't yet got around to another stratagem. (One is ready, in my head.) His photos are only Arbussy in some senses; anyway, click the links at the foot of that page and you'll see a few. -- Hoary 13:19, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Whats in dispute about the image I loaded? Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 22:27, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Please read the relevent edit in WP:PUI. feydey 22:35, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Hey, you sent me a message regarding the Ed Gein picture I uploaded. I did leave a source location in the summary box stating it was from their myspace and leaving a link. The Metro 22:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Alright, I edited it with a more specific link. The Metro 00:59, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Yes I'd like to keep the picture. I've seen this picture in many different sources (books, journals etc), and I'm pretty sure it's not a CP violation, provided that we link the source. Regards. Miskin 14:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Images from cnn.com cannot be claimed as PD US government and linking the source doesn't mean the image cannot be a copyright violation. Regards. feydey 14:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

So, how can I verify? Miskin 16:19, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Verify what? feydey 17:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Whether it has PD US government license, or any other sort of free license. Notice the CNN signature on the pic, does it imply anything? Miskin 09:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Why did you remove the image? We're allowed to use screen shots JackO'Lantern 18:56, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

The image is without a source and screenshots are fair use images to be used only in the film article. feydey 19:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

No, that's just not true, screenshots are almost always used in actor pages. Please see featured articles Katie Holmes and Lindsay Lohan. JackO'Lantern 19:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

No, "screenshots are almost always used in actor pages" is not true, do you have the source for this comment? As of these FA's they have paragraphs written on the film the screenshot depicts. Just placing a screenshot to an actor article is not fair use, the tag says: "for identification and critical commentary on the film and its contents" (bolded by me). feydey 20:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, in that case Jacob Smith's picture would be fair use, because the film is certainly discussed in his article (and the same is accurate for the majority of screenshots I add). JackO'Lantern 21:05, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Remember: Wikipedia:Fair_use#Policy #8. The material must contribute significantly to the article (e.g. identify the subject of an article, or specifically illustrate relevant points or sections within the text) and must not serve a purely decorative purpose. feydey 21:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Also "discussed in his article" cannot simply be a line in the filmography. feydey 21:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Wellll.... Lindsay Lohan has a screenshot from "Another World" despite it only being one line about it. It also has a screenshot from SNL with Tina Fey, with no identifiable commentary on that appearance. The policy is so vague in that sense that anyone, including you or me, can basically stretch it to whatever purposes they want. The picture for Smith contributes to the article, obviously, because it has no picture and it identifies the subject. ""discussed in his article" cannot simply be a line in the filmography" is what you, not the policy, wrote, and if that was true that those two pictures of Lindsay Lohan I mentioned shouldn't be there in an FA. JackO'Lantern 21:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

I believe the point of Wikipedia is to create a free encyclopedia and not to "stretch it [policy] to whatever purposes" - that is not the spirit. And if a FA has a screenshot not following fair use, then it will be removed, and You might know that FAs are demoted and edited all the time, they are not supreme perfect articles. An article needs good writing in my opinion, not just a bunch of non-free copyrighted images, just because fair use images are available. There is nothing wrong with You uploading screenshots, but please use them carefully. I hope that You can see that i'm discussing this matter to make this project better and sounder. Best wishes, feydey 21:27, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Well you should remove the screenshots on Lohan, then. The SNL appearance picture at the bottom is not discussed at all. Good writing is definitely good, but an article should have at least one picture, and if there are at least one-two lines about it, it seems fair to me and that's what I've seen everywhere on Wiki when it comes to actors. So, can I restore the Smith picture? "Cheaper by the Dozen" is certainly given at least some consideration in what is a pretty short article. JackO'Lantern 21:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

OK, I'm doing that for the images I upload now. JackO'Lantern 21:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

I hope You understand the point i'm trying to make. I cannot police Your edits and say that is acceptable and that is not. Please consider the Smith picture fair use yourself and so on in the future. Thanks. feydey 21:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

P.S. See also the discussion here: Wikipedia_talk:Fair_use#Use of cover images. feydey 22:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm, thanks, I didn't notice. I'll look for a different pic. JackO'Lantern 22:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi, can you tell me precisely what part of Wikipedia:Fair_use#Policy the removed images violate? The instant images reflect differing points in her career and are supported by accompanying text and/or filmography. Thanks. RadioKirk talk to me 22:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Fair_use#Policy #3 and #8 say: The amount of copyrighted work used should be as little as possible.; The material must contribute significantly to the article. You say: [they] are supported by accompanying text and/or filmography. As I see Image:Lindsaysnl.jpg has just this line: Saturday Night Live - Host of the season finale, 21 May 2005 and Image:Lohan AW.jpg has this: ...in 1996 when she landed the role of Alexandra "Alli" Fowler on Another World, "where she delivered more dialogue than any other 10-year-old in daytime serials" of the time. I think the other screenshots have been discussed in the article and help it, as these two are just for illustration. As I see the article is as good as w/o those 2 images. feydey 22:32, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, I half agree, so you'll note I put one back (with respect). You yourself note, "Image:Lohan AW.jpg has this: ...in 1996 when she landed the role of Alexandra "Alli" Fowler on Another World, 'where she delivered more dialogue than any other 10-year-old in daytime serials' of the time." For a 10-year-old actor, this is a significant milestone unequaled at the time, and I tend to feel its illustration is warranted. Comment? RadioKirk talk to me 22:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm still unsure about that image too, as it doesn't add nothing new as content, just her face (and doesn't tell anything about the milestone) and there are already 5 such images in the article. Also the removal keeps the amount of copyrighted fair use images down... The pro side is that it shows her younger (she still looks the same IMHO). feydey 22:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I've improved the pic's caption; the cited source (or a similar one) notes that her first line of dialogue ever was "Merry Christmas, Grandma!" which, if not at that instant, is sometime in the scene depicted. Let me know if this satisfies. RadioKirk talk to me 22:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Well now the image looks pretty relevant and I'd keep it now. feydey 23:05, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Sounds good, thanks for the assist. :) RadioKirk talk to me 23:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Can you help me with this? Sorry, I am new. I put thumbnail|right|250px| where do I write the other info?

photo was taken in spring 2003 in the front of Saint Cecilia Cathedral in Omaha, Nebraska

oops so sorry ````

Alright mate, you are quick off the mark. I am reasonably new to this game so I was wondering if you could clarify what exactly your concern is? The gif was downloaded from publically supported website westcork.ie and while I amn't 100% sure I am fairly positive its already in the public domain.

Out of curosity do you have a connecyion with West Cork?

Cheers

hi

Someone told me that they posted to my user page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Number77 but I can't find this person's comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.174.61.126 (talk • contribs)

I have replied to his talk page. Pepsidrinka 18:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)