Hi Ethically Yours! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flipkart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

--

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/If It's Not Forever at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

• This is a new article, within 10 minutes of the time you Reviewed it. Please look at it again, a little closer. If you have any other questions if it meets the DYK requirements - let me know. Thanks!--Doug Coldwell (talk) 16:23, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Courage and Conviction: An Autobiography at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bcp67 (talk) 14:44, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing. Actually, FYI, it's a new article. Someone didn't see the reasoning and is querying the hook, but I'm sure you got it. -- Ohc ^¡digame! 15:45, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

For your convenience in reviewing DYK nominations.

• Rules
• DYK Reviewing guide

A new article has no need for expansion. How much expansion is required on older articles depends on the subject of the article. And if it's a recently promoted Good Article, that kicks it into another category also.

There are also many other items that need to be checked in a review besides date and length. Hope the above links are helpful to you. — Maile (talk) 16:33, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the stroopwafels. When I first started reviewing DYKs, only about 18 months ago, I was inept. I think my first one was eyeballing the article and posting something clueless like, "Oh, yeah, it looks good to me." I learned one mistake at a time, and by paying attention to what other editors were catching in reviews. I'm still not sure how to review a Good Article, since that is a recent addition to the process. I finally made my own checklist so the next pair of eyes would know exactly what I checked. Variation is below. You'll figure out what works best for you personally. Good luck with DYK. — Maile (talk) 22:26, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

• QPQ done by (user name)
• Article created by-or Article moved from user page by (user name) on (date) and has (number) characters of readable prose

Note: No matter what the DYK check says about date of article created, if it also indicates a date it was moved from User space, that is the date DYK recognizes it became an article. Date-wise, what happens in user space doesn't count.

• (if an expansion) Size of readable prose in article on the date right before expansion is the base for measuring expansion
• (if an expansion) 5X expansion for most articles, 2X expansion for BLP that had no sourcing
• Every paragraph must have at least once source
• Hook length (less than 200 characters) and must be sourced at the end of the article sentence it refers to
• NPOV
• Image source and license on Commons

These tools are in the upper right hand corner of the edit window of the review template

• QPQ check (to verify if a self-nominator has more than 5 DYKs, thereby requiring they do a QPQ)
• Copyvio check (not very thorough, but is supposed to check the entire article)
• Duplication Detector (for checking one source at a time)
• Disambig links tool
• External links tool

• Thank you so much for all these tips in general. Looking forward to review properly the next time I do so. Ehthically^Yours! 08:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

I've done what I can, but could only go so far because of the sourcing. Here's some advice I give you:

1) Wikipedia is global, and DYK accepts nominations sourced in all languages, and has reviewers who understand many languages - and in fact, several who are fluent in German. No need to suggest to an editor they provide sourcing in any particular language.

2) Stick to reviews where you understand the language of the sourcing. There will be reviewers for the other languages.

3) If the article has a minimum 1,500 characters, it's fine. No need to suggest the editor expand the article just because of length. You might want to peruse the DYK talk page debate on raising that minimum length.

Good luck in future reviews. — Maile (talk) 17:21, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Why did you close that Aerica discussion without letting an actual discussion take place? Is there some reason that you closed it after it had been open for two hours? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:03, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

I guessed it was an inappropriate nomination by a user named ArticleForDeletion who now might have been blocked for username policy violation. It had been nominated twice earlier, and resulted in keeps. However, I regret if I have made some serious blunder and I am really sorry for that, if you feel like, do revert my close and let the discussion continue. I am a relatively new editor with 550 edits now and I am still learning. Thank you for pointing out. Ethically ^(Yours) 16:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Well, my biggest concern was that you might have used the close as a supervote. The nominator was blocked because of his username. His behavior wasn't a consideration. Second, consensus can change. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Martin was closed near-unanimously as Keep in November 2013, but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Martin (2nd nomination) was closed near-unanimously as Delete in December 2013. That's obviously a bit of an extreme example. I don't know if the Aerican debate would turn out any differently this time, but I think it could have attracted a few merge or delete votes. It's not a huge deal, but I thought that maybe a fan of the article was silencing debate on the issue – especially given that it was closed almost as soon as it was opened. If you legitimately believe that it was going to be speedily kept and you have no bias toward the article, then I'm satisfied. It's good that you're volunteering to help out, but I'd advise that you let discussions go for longer than two hours. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Ethically Yours, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 05:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Did u study the article thoroughly to check whether it meets the GA criteria? Also, I doubt if u made any major contributions to the article. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 16:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Well, I feel it meets the criteria. Majority of the article looks okay; I am just working in the side. Ethically ^(Yours) 16:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello friend, How are you ? Jessica090 (talk) 13:06, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you mate. But a simple WikiLove would have done the job for saying "Thank You"- barnstars are to be used for greater achievements. Ethically ^(Yours) 13:17, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

I will review Chennai Express if you are willing to review Alyssa Miller and can complete your review by the end of the month.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:48, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chennai Express you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 07:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

You may also want to consider applying for adminship in the future. ;-) Happy holidays, Epicgenius (talk) 23:02, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chennai Express, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manorama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

The article Chennai Express you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Chennai Express for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 19:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

The article Chennai Express you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Chennai Express for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 15:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hey, hey! This is a grave misunderstanding. I only reverted your edits twice (the first one was my mistake, though), and the other edits I reverted were vandalism. Please don't falsely accuse me. Regards, --Jionpedia ✉ 15:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Snapchat hack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of 2014 Snapchat hack at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Lungi Dance at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Rcej (Robert) – talk 04:25, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 11:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 16:56, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing the refs. Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 14:27, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Even though Chennai Express is awaiting its second GA review, there are a few suggestions I could give u:

• The lead has too many sources; As per this, the lead does not have to include sources if the content is already there in the body of the article.
• Dhoom 3 is linked twice in the lead. Pls avoid overlinking.
• The film received mixed reviews, but the "film's soundtrack, composed by the Vishal-Shekhar duo, also received positive reviews from critics" - ???
• Doesn't "wrapped up" sound a bit slangy?
• Please rework the third paragraph of the lead.
• The plot is more than 806 words long. As per this, plot summaries should be 400 and 700 words.

Pls fix all these issues, and happy editing! I wish u all the best for the GA review. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:49, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks User:Kailash29792 for pointing out the faults. Have fixed all of them except the Plot rewording. Will work on that soon. Ethically ^(Yours) 07:17, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

The GOCE editing is complete and the plot word count looks fine enough. U ok with a GAN this time? Kailash29792 (talk) 14:03, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes, would be appreciated. Ethically^Yours! 16:12, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Congrats, you've robbed me of a DYK, you know that? Buzz me if you need any help regarding CE, are you Indian? Soham 15:36, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I am Soham! Glad to find another Indian here. Welcome to my page! Ethically ^(Yours) 15:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

• I had a hunch you were, going by your edits. Indian content-driven editors are hard to find, therefore its a pleasure to find you. I look forward on collaborating with you. Soham 15:42, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Please use care when accepting edits to the date pages as you did here. The intention of pending revisions on these pages is to avoid just these types of edits. If you have questions, please ask. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 10:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Ethically Yours! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 07:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Yay!

Rmarmorstein (talk) 15:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks mate, sincerely appreciated! Ethically ^(Yours) 16:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Snapchat hack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Snapchat hack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest 2 talk 15:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry but the wikipedia chemicals standard is to use the IUPAC approved naming for sulfides. Can you please move it back.Axiosaurus (talk) 12:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

 Done Sorry, I was at fault here and did not know about the thing. We use sulphide locally so I thought it must be it. Thanks for pointing out. Ethically ^(Yours) 12:32, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, would you mind if I nominated Wave (Deraniyagala book) for DYK, which would hopefully result in it appearing on the main page? Thanks, Matty.007 18:22, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Matty, FYI I already nominated it. The Dyk subpage for the aforementioned nomination is Template:Did you know nominations/Wave (2013 book). Thank you so much! Ethically ^(Yours) 11:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed it. Thanks, Matty.007 18:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:13, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Greatest Mystery Solvers is private. I do not sell it. I only give it to my friends for reading.Are you mad? This not a hoax. It's private. Don't delete it. If you delete it, then i will call you an Idiot.

The point here is that none of the books and stories you have written about are notable enough. It needs a significant number of reliable sources for it to become eligible as an article here. Quoting you, "Greatest Mystery Solvers is private. I do not sell it. I only give it to my friends for reading" Given this I don't guess there is any possible source in this internet that reviews the book. And even if it does get reviewed, it's not going to get reviewed by someone like the New York Times, or say the The Daily Telegraph, is it? On another note, I would humbly request you to be civil while speaking with other editors. Let's say this is one of the fundamental pillars of Wikipedia. Thanks. Ethically ^(Yours) 16:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stonington, Maine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you've left comment on User:Tnb kep's report that they have not contributed so far. For your information, their contribution has been erased. They did create article on TNB KEP. Best Regards. Hitro talk 10:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

very much - you brought a warm smile to my face on a very cold day up here. Thank you for the Barnstar. Ian Furst (talk) 17:55, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello Ethically Yours, I'd just like to say that I really appreciate the comment you made about my edits on the requests for rollback page. In the year that I've been reverting vandalism no-one has seemed to make any comment about some of my efforts until you did just then. So for that, I would like to thank you. I'll let you know if I get rollback :) ◄Sandshark23► talk♦contribs 09:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

It's my pleasure Sandshark. You see what, I also don't get comments about my work, but still I keep doing that and award others, because I love making someone happy. That's my principle philosophy. You made my day good, mate. Cheers, and do keep me posted. Ethically^Yours! 10:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

I sure will! I guess while I am here, I'd like to ask a question about modifying signatures - as you can see I have modified mine, but how do I make it so that the arrows don't appear purple after I click them? Is there a certain code I have to use? ◄Sandshark23► talk♦contribs 10:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Although I do create websites and well know CSS, I'm afraid I'm not sure how to do it on-wiki here, because (a)Wikipedia does not allow the usage of <style> tag, and (b) No support for <a> tag. However, I may give you a clue. We need to use CSS for that. Using this as the code, a:visited {color:x;} where x is the color name, you can modify visited link colors. I have made a script that greatly simplifies looking at links in Wikipedia. Here's it: User:Ethically Yours/link.css. Paste importScript('User:Ethically Yours/link.css') in your vector.css page. However I have something to offer you and I don't want to leave you stranded. I offer you something cooler: cross hair signature. Use it if you like. Try hovering your mouse over your modified, custom signature below. You'll see a "+" kind of thing. Try it:

◄Sandshark23► talk♦contribs

	The Original Barnstar
	For all your great on wiki work; DYKs and great new articles, and being friendly all around. Matty.007 11:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Oh goodness, that was one from the blue. Completely unexpected, Matty, believe me. Today is going to be somewhat special for me. Thanks again! Ethically^Yours! 12:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Glad to have made you happy, thank you very much for my personalised barnstar. Have a great day, and hope you continue editing Wikipedia, Matty.007 16:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chennai Super Kings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Henry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Hey Ethically, I ended up getting Rollback! Thanks for your support. Also, thanks for the custom thing you did with my signature but I think I'll stick to the original cursor. Thanks anyway. And sorry I took so long to respond, I've been busy. ◄Sandshark23► talk♦contribs 23:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm glad you got it. It's okay, real life comes first. Ethically^Yours! 11:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

The copy editing for Chennai Express is going on at the moment. Once it is over, do u want to take it to GA status? Kailash29792 (talk) 14:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Y Yes. I maintain my stand as before. I wish to promote it to a GA Status. Ethically^Yours! 15:29, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Mate, we have WP:CONSENSUS over at WP:ICTF to use BoxofficeIndia.com as the only source for Box Office Figures specially if the rest of the article cites the website for BO related stuff. If you have any further questions ask at my tp. I'll be happy to resolve them. —Soham 15:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Byculla to Bangkok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metropolitan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Hye, you recently tagged the above page for unreliable sources, can I know why.--Skr15081997 (talk) 09:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Of course, yes. You have used only IMDB as a source of reference. You may want to check this link out. ImDB's credibility as a reference source. It's in the rulebooks, mate. Happy editing and good luck. Ethically^Yours! 09:41, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Shammi (actress) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Montanabw^(talk) 07:06, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

I passed this article but another editor has pulled it due to close paraphrasing concerns. Better head over there and see what you can do. I don't think the other editor onthis article will be able to fix them. Good luck and ping me if you need a hand! Montanabw^(talk) 23:11, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Sounds like there are more copy and paste or close paraphrasing issues with the article than expected, see User:Nikkimaria's talk about this issue. I don't know how much you want to help this new editor out, but it looks like ore rephrasing and rewriting may be needed to settle the issue. (Sigh...I've long given up on arguing on these issues... ) Montanabw^(talk) 01:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Byculla to Bangkok at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Montanabw^(talk) 18:19, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

• Issues still remain after your most recent edits to the article over a week and a half ago. Please stop by to address them as soon as possible. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:55, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
  • I am Ethically's brother here, and he's asked me to post this reply message. He's suffered a serious back injury because of an unfortunate accident that took place while he was returning from Delhi, India. He's admitted to a hospital now and cannot at present, reply back or fix the article. He is gradually recovering. He notified me as he noticed the e-mail in his account. Sorry for any inconvenience. Ethically^Yours! 04:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rashtriya Aam Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashtriya Aam Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 19:22, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited EBay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defacing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:The Siege Book.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 11:13, 30 August 2014 (UTC)