User:Adwiii/Demiurge1000

Languages, contact and location

Caption

Wikipedia:Babel

en-5

This user can contribute with a professional level of English.

en-GB

This user is a native speaker of British English.

en-us
-4

This user has a near-native understanding of American English.

grc-3

Ὅδε ὁ χρήστης δύναται συμβάλλεσθαι ἀνωτέρᾳ γνώσει τῆς ἀρχαίας ἑλληνικῆς.

la-3

Hic usor callidissima latinitate contribuere potest.

ke-2

Ὁ χρήστης οὗτος δύναται συνεισφέρειν μετὰ μέσης γνώσεως τῆς Κοινῆς Ἑλληνικῆς.

fr-2

Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau intermédiaire en français.

es-2

Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel intermedio de español.

el-2

Αυτός ο χρήστης μπορεί να συνεισφέρει σε μεσαίου επιπέδου ελληνικά.

pt-1

Este usuário/utilizador pode contribuir com um nível básico de português.

Search user languages

@

This user can be reached by email.

This user lives in the United Kingdom.

On Wikipedia

Caption

This user is bold, but not reckless, in updating pages.

This user is a known talk page watcher.

This user is a WikiImp
(and may practice drive-by tagging).

This editor is a WikiGnome.

4,000+

This user has made more than 4,000 contributions to Wikipedia.

This user has been on Wikipedia for 14 years, 6 months and 15 days.

This editor is a Journeyman Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

This user reports vandals to administrators so they can be blocked.

This user tried to do the right thing and believed in good faith but got disillusioned and started to believe in bad faith. If this user has become paranoid, please let this user know.

NPOV

This user gets quite annoyed when they see POV in the mainspace.

This user tries not to behave like an angry mastodon.

This user is a member of
the Guild of Copy Editors.

This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

SB

This user lets SuggestBot recommend articles to edit once a month.

This user disapproves of mindless PR firm sockpuppets spreading paid POV around Wikipedia.

Interests

Caption

This user is interested in military aircraft and their history.

This user is interested in the MILITARY HISTORY of the Ancient World

This user is interested in tanks.

This user is interested in
World War II

This user is interested in naval warfare.

This user is interested in aerial warfare.

Policy views

Caption

This user believes that anyone who thinks Wikipedia is an unreliable source should continue their quest to find a better website.

This user values the quality of Wikipedia articles over the quantity and thus supports the merging of related content and deletion of articles that violate policies and guidelines.

Wikipedia is not censored.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nunc a arcu dui. Curabitur in augue purus. Sed laoreet consequat rutrum. Duis in est quis massa laoreet viverra sit amet ut arcu. Maecenas consequat cursus sagittis. Nunc lacinia porta nulla, sollicitudin porttitor sem aliquam sed. In hendrerit, urna at laoreet semper, risus tortor egestas sem, ut facilisis leo urna eu ante. Morbi placerat lacinia quam non suscipit. Vivamus a porta risus. Integer consectetur mi ullamcorper ipsum volutpat condimentum. Pellentesque sit amet odio vitae massa pulvinar rutrum vitae id elit. Donec vestibulum augue et erat tempor congue. Etiam dapibus velit ut diam fringilla vitae ultricies nisl venenatis.

Etiam congue tempor augue eget varius. Mauris tristique lobortis sollicitudin. Vivamus arcu eros, consectetur eu dignissim eu, congue vel nisl. Sed ipsum sem, ultricies ut pharetra quis, accumsan ut arcu. Nunc suscipit, justo sed tempor varius, mauris tortor rhoncus augue, dapibus gravida mi felis sollicitudin eros. Phasellus a augue ut massa lacinia congue nec at orci. Duis semper purus vel nisl iaculis pellentesque. Praesent tellus quam, pharetra ac laoreet a, tincidunt ut libero. Praesent ullamcorper, sapien sit amet suscipit adipiscing, lacus neque lacinia tellus, id imperdiet est quam id eros. Nulla ac odio lacus. Donec congue lorem vel risus feugiat sollicitudin. Vivamus sem velit, consectetur ac molestie sit amet, luctus at augue.

Ut nisl quam, scelerisque id elementum non, tempor sed lectus. Etiam faucibus facilisis risus, non commodo odio ullamcorper quis. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut ut nibh sed enim varius semper. Pellentesque laoreet dictum augue, vitae posuere mauris facilisis in. Cras nec leo cursus eros tempor dapibus. Cras bibendum metus a felis auctor consequat. Ut at turpis elit, vel lacinia nulla. Cras non euismod ligula. Sed sed orci arcu, at bibendum ante. Nulla vehicula enim quis orci fermentum ultrices. Sed feugiat leo vitae justo fringilla hendrerit. Quisque nibh justo, faucibus id faucibus et, adipiscing nec libero.

Sed a dui nibh, a semper erat. Curabitur semper tincidunt tincidunt. Proin luctus sagittis tincidunt. Suspendisse sed nulla at purus eleifend pulvinar sed sit amet libero. Pellentesque nec urna arcu. Cras vitae nisi velit. Aliquam erat volutpat. Nulla vehicula interdum euismod. Praesent bibendum vulputate blandit. Donec vel fringilla tellus. Aenean laoreet cursus elit, ac fringilla lacus ullamcorper ac. Sed vitae felis massa, non rhoncus sem. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Donec eu nunc nec purus pulvinar auctor. Vestibulum lectus arcu, laoreet vel dapibus id, lobortis sed lectus. Fusce id elit eros. Duis ante felis, sollicitudin at condimentum vel, tempus a eros.

Duis lobortis volutpat erat, ac vestibulum sem bibendum a. Curabitur non dui id elit suscipit volutpat. Etiam eget ante dolor. Nam at dolor nulla, nec dignissim odio. Cras neque enim, tristique auctor varius id, volutpat vitae mi. Cras rhoncus condimentum pharetra. Fusce ac ipsum id lectus luctus pellentesque in ac nulla. Nam posuere sem et lacus placerat dapibus. Proin non pellentesque quam. Donec ultrices urna vitae nibh rutrum eget dignissim leo sagittis. Ut varius ipsum quis elit aliquet at vulputate orci laoreet. Donec nec nibh et elit eleifend ultrices. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Cras adipiscing mi ut orci bibendum porttitor. Fusce dictum, massa vitae dignissim rhoncus, purus purus ornare nunc, nec mollis ante nunc ut lorem. Nam accumsan diam nec tortor cursus pellentesque rhoncus purus viverra. Nullam faucibus eleifend sapien quis feugiat. Suspendisse in arcu in nisi viverra tempor vitae eget est. Nulla vel ante leo. Sed fringilla bibendum metus, a mattis nisl auctor vitae.

Grammar and spelling

Caption

This user employs a more formal style of writing in articles than in talk pages.

they

This user frequently uses singular they as it is a handy gender-neutral pronoun.

whom

This user insists upon using whom wherever it is called for, and fixes the errors of whomever they see.

~~you~~ one

This user knows that one should not use "you" in encyclopedia articles or other formal works.

than
then

This user understands the difference between using "than" and "then."

their
there
they're

This user thinks that there are too many people who don’t know that they're worse than their own children at spelling!

your
you're

This user thinks that if your grammar is incorrect, then you're in need of help.

Majority ≠ right

This user recognizes that even if 300,000,000 people make the same mistake, it's still a mistake.

Education

Caption

M

This user has a Master's degree.

This user graduated from the University of Oxford.

1sex

This user went to a single sex secondary school.

Miscellany

Caption

This user is male.

This user is a citizen of the European Union.

This user wastes far too much time editing Wikipedia.

This user contributes using Firefox.

Hackers, beware. This user has a strong password.

vn-2

This user page has been vandalized twice.

This user absolutely detests small flies that attempt to enter ears.

This user likes to play strategy games on a computer.

This user has posted to Usenet newsgroups.

Adwiii believes
there is no cabal.
And actively opposes it.

9

This user has visited 9 of the 205 countries in the world.

Date and time

Caption

00:00

This user uses 24-hour time.

2024-12-26

This user uses ISO-8601 to express dates.

This user observes British Summer Time during the summer.

Food and drink

Caption

This user likes
TABASCO pepper sauce .

This user will eat fish raw.
Here fishy, fishy, fishy.

This user likes a little bit of food with their red pepper.

Popular culture - film

Caption

This user knows that we can't stop here – this is bat country.

FC

This user does not talk about Fight Club.

This user ate a census taker's liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti.

LOTR

This user loves The Lord of the Rings, both the books and the films.

This user needs your clothes, your boots, and your motorcycle.

Things that aren't User Boxes

Caption

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

This editor is a **Grognard** and is entitled to display this **Wikipedia Little Red Book**.

Most people didn't like this scary revision of Jimbo's talk page (you need to wait on the page a few moments to see it...)

"Commentators often express doubt whether he is being sarcastic or just incoherent" - from our article on Muammar Gaddafi but sometimes true of me too.

Significant articles to which I have contributed

Caption
Malmö FF (as copyeditor).

Something to Keep in Mind

Caption

I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.

–Jimmy Wales ^[1]^[2]^[3]

Something Else to Keep in Mind

Caption

Wikipedia's policy on Biographies of living persons mentions that material about living persons in any Wikipedia page must follow all applicable laws in the United States of America. This does not mean that compliance with U.S. law is sufficient for compliance with Wikipedia policy on such material. The policy does not exist for the primary purpose of avoiding litigation. It exists for the primary purpose of avoiding the possibility of harm to living subjects -- and the avoidance of litigation is merely a fortuitous consequence of this.

In other words, confidence that publication of material would not be defamatory (for example because it is sourced to an identifiable third party publication) does not establish that the material meets the requirements of WP:BLP. It should be expected that even respectable broadsheet newspapers or news websites will routinely publish material about living persons that may not be suitable as part of an encyclopedia.

Barnstars

Caption

		The Original Barnstar
		Demiurge1000 I would like to award you this Barnstar for you help on my article The Academy at Lincoln. I am fairly new to Wikipedia and am still working on learning all of the rules and Wikipedia guide lines. Thanks for editing my page, stopping the vandalism on it, and making it better conform to Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks for all your help teaching me the ropes, if i need anymore help I will be sure to let you know! @ d \/\/ \| \| \|,~Adwiii -Questions? Comments? 00:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

		The Editor's Barnstar
		for your careful and deliberate edits on Shmuley_Boteach Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 04:42, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		To Demiurge1000, for diligent efforts to stymie P.R. sock puppeteers. The Interior (Talk) 03:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

		The Guidance Barnstar
		Thanks Demiurge1000, you have been so helpful to me showing me around learning, teaching me how this place works. WP needs more people like you helping out new users. If it wasn't for you I probably would have gotten booted out for not following some random policy I had never heard of. Again thanks for everything you have done, _{@ d \/\/ \| \| \|}^Talk 20:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Stop signs and sockpuppetry

Caption

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 21:53, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Daedalus969 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 18:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Boyd Barrett, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The warning you gave me on Viticulturist99 (talk) was a frivolous warning. I haven't done a single reversion but kept editing and improving the article according to the consensus finally reached on the talk page. Your intervention amounts to censorship if not to harrassment. Wikipedia is not not censored. Please stop. --Viticulturist99 (talk) 04:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Stop acting in what appears to be bad faith. Your hostile comments on my talk page and your revert of a simple, correct edit show signs of some kind of grudge. It would be more productive for you to use your energy elsewhere - Unixtastic (talk) 21:58, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Best user talk pages on Wikipedia

Caption
User talk:RHaworth User talk:Nableezy User talk:Malleus Fatuorum User talk:Mbz1 User talk:Sandstein User talk:GiacomoReturned

Resources

Caption

^ Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). ""Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved 2006-06-11.
^ http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046732.html
^ Wales, Jimbo. "Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales jwales at wikia.com Mon Dec 6 18:35:38 UTC 2004". Retrieved 2011-02-22. Delirium wrote: Well, I'd expand the ban on "original research" slightly further than just that. An article that makes no new low-level claims, but nonethless synthesizes work in a non-standard way, is effectively original research that I think we ought not to publish. This comes up most often in history, where there is a tendency by some Wikipedians to produce novel narratives and historical interpretations with citation to primary sources to back up their interpretation of events. Even if their citations are accurate, Wikipedia's poorly equipped to judge whether their particular synthesis of the available information is a reasonable one. [Jimbo Wales writes] I agree completely. I think in part this is just a symptom of an unfortunate tendency of disrespect for history as a professional discipline. Some who completely understand why Wikipedia ought not create novel theories of physics by citing the results of experiments and so on and synthesizing them into something new, may fail to see how the same thing applies to history. --Jimbo

[1] Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). ""Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved 2006-06-11.

[2] ttp://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046732.html

[3] Wales, Jimbo. "Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales jwales at wikia.com Mon Dec 6 18:35:38 UTC 2004". Retrieved 2011-02-22. Delirium wrote: Well, I'd expand the ban on "original research" slightly further than just that. An article that makes no new low-level claims, but nonethless synthesizes work in a non-standard way, is effectively original research that I think we ought not to publish. This comes up most often in history, where there is a tendency by some Wikipedians to produce novel narratives and historical interpretations with citation to primary sources to back up their interpretation of events. Even if their citations are accurate, Wikipedia's poorly equipped to judge whether their particular synthesis of the available information is a reasonable one. [Jimbo Wales writes] I agree completely. I think in part this is just a symptom of an unfortunate tendency of disrespect for history as a professional discipline. Some who completely understand why Wikipedia ought not create novel theories of physics by citing the results of experiments and so on and synthesizing them into something new, may fail to see how the same thing applies to history. --Jimbo

[1]

[2]

[3]

Fahrer / Team für die Suche eingeben:

Fahrer / Team für die Suche eingeben:

Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User:Adwiii/Demiurge1000