Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

Hi there! Just letting you know I have a FLC running, if you ever have time, feel free to leave some comments. Greets and all the best; Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Classical Compilation Albums Chart number ones of the 2000s is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Classical Compilation Albums Chart number ones of the 2000s until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 15:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there A Thousand Doors.

Firstly, I must apologise because I am not at all familiar with the formal conventions of Wikipedia, and so am not sure whether this is the appropriate place to ask this question. Anyway, I have discovered that you are largely responsible for the Wikipedia page for Bedsitcom, a show that I have been unable to track down and watch despite persistent efforts over the past couple of years (indeed ever since I read the page I've been fascinated by this elusive programme). However, since you have been able to write and maintain such a thorough Wikipedia entry, I am (dearly) hoping that you have some way of watching the show. If this is the case, could you please reach out to me at atrophyh@gmail.com? I would be eternally grateful for anything you could do to point me in the direction of a place where I could watch Bedsitcom. Thanks in advance, and once again I apologise profusely if this question violates any of the talk page guidelines.

All best (Atrophy husband (talk) 20:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Hi there Atrophy husband, thank you for your message. I wish that I had some better news for you, but unfortunately I haven't had access to the episodes of Bedsitcom for several years now, and, like you, I haven't been able to find them anywhere online either. I'm sorry that I can't be more help to you. The only thing that I can suggest is to contact either the production company that made the show (Objective Productions) or maybe one of the writers (Sam Bain and Jesse Armstrong are both on Twitter, for example), and ask them if Bedsitcom was released on DVD or is available to stream anywhere. I wouldn't get your hopes up, but best of luck! A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 12:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AQA Anthology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michele Roberts. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Having my edit reverted set off my inner pedant, so I had a look at the references on the page :). I was aware of the policy on leads when I made the edit, I should have taken longer to verify that there was unsourced material.

• I'm not sure that there's a reference on the page that supports the claim that the Canadian government pulled it, I tried to find one, but there is certainly no inline citation after that sentence
• BBC iPlayer references (25 and 27) are not the most verifiable, but they're not used for content in the lead and probably don't need "better citation needed" templates
• The plot of "Lift" was supported, but not by the nearest inline references, so I re-used a reference from elsewhere after that sentence. I don't think any of the references mention that the ladies "return to their desks" so that could be cut, though references do discuss that it is likely a recurring incident, which is perhaps more interesting.

Dhalamh (talk) 21:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, A Thousand Doors. I'm just posting to let you know that NME's Cool List – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for October 28. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Giants! A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 00:09, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pro-EU leaflet, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 2016 leaflet published by the British government warned that Brexit would increase the cost of living and lead to a decade or more of uncertainty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/EU leaflet. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pro-EU leaflet), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pro-EU leaflet you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hoary -- Hoary (talk) 04:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've finished reviewing the article, and that I did so by plonking a plus mark on it. Well done, and I hope that the GA process wasn't so arduous or otherwise horrible that you'll give up on it. (I'm amazed/amused to realize that, as far as I recall, I gave up on it for seventeen years.) -- Hoary (talk) 02:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your diligent review, Hoary! Your advice and feedback have certainly improved the article. Thanks again! A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 10:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pro-EU leaflet you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pro-EU leaflet for comments about the article, and Talk:Pro-EU leaflet/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hoary -- Hoary (talk) 02:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envy & Other Sins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of Brexit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign secretary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you created Great Reality TV Swindle (12 years ago, I know, but I see that you've edited it as recently as last year, so maybe you're still interested?). I've opened a discussion on the talk page that I'd invite you to weigh in on -- I believe that the basic premise of the article, and the article's title, are wrong. The con that Nik Russian came up with was a thing called Project MS-2; later Channel 4 aired a documentary titled The Great Reality TV Swindle about the con. Since the actual documentary is barely mentioned in passing in the "Media reactions" section, I believe the article would be better titled Project MS-2. Let me know your thoughts. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, A Thousand Doors! The list you nominated, Timeline of Brexit, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello A Thousand Doors, it's been a while. You might recall reviewing my list of List of best-selling Latin albums in the United States. Well I put a peer review request for List of best-selling Latin albums and was wondering if you would consider leaving a review on the list. I'd really appreciate it! Erick (talk) 19:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Timeline of Partygate, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a £142 wine fridge was smuggled into Downing Street on 11 December 2020, during the height of the COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Timeline of Partygate. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Timeline of Partygate), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,842 views (743.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, A Thousand Doors! The list you nominated, Timeline of Partygate, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]