This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Templates This template (like all templates) is within the scope of WikiProject Templates, a group dedicated to improving the maintenance of Wikipedia's templates. This particular template is especially important to the project because it is used in the maintenance of other templates. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TemplatesWikipedia:WikiProject TemplatesTemplate:WikiProject TemplatesTemplates

The a in ”Northern Sami” should be changed with an á, because it’s the proper way of spelling the language’s name. Thatpulpetti (talk) 01:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template {{Documentation}}. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On module sandboxes, there is a message "See also the companion subpage for test cases (run)." and the "run" is a link to the talk page of the test cases, where the tests are executed. (I don't know where this message is produced because it does not seem to come from Template:Template sandbox notice.) I would like to propose that the run link be added to this module to appear next to the link to test cases, at the end of the documentation. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MSGJ, this already displays for me on modules in the metadata box (aka "the end of the documentation" box): Editors can experiment in this module's sandbox (edit | diff) and testcases (edit | run) pages.? Izno (talk) 21:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I realised this later. I think I was looking at a module which had testcases in Module talk namespace but no unit tests in Module namespace. And the "run" link is not displayed in this case — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the run link is a redlink, could it be modified to preload {{#invoke:{{PAGENAME}}|run_tests}} the same way that the testcases link preloads Template:Documentation/preload-module-testcases? --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please add the following lines to the top of the module:

local makeInvokeFunc = require("Module:MakeInvokeFunc")(p)

And then remove the explicit function definition for makeInvokeFunc from the module at line 94.

I created that module because it actually has a lot of potential for utility across modules. If an admin could also protect Module:MakeInvokeFunc to be template or full protected then it would address the concerns of "high risk". Awesome Aasim 19:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pause for now because there is one more thing I realize this module needs. Awesome Aasim 19:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay reopening, but with modifications. Also do the same with local message = require("Module:Message")(cfg). These helper functions can be quite useful in other modules which is why I pulled them out. Also protect afterword. Awesome Aasim 22:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't you the same person who claimed only a few weeks ago that this module should never need to be edited? Anyway, I think this request simply makes things more complicated for no apparent benefit, so deactivating. There's no harm in a 15-line function that has never changed in years being duplicated in a few places. On top of that it isn't really that genericizable in the first place since each module uses a slightly different version to handle things like wrapper templates, whether to trim whitespace, etc. that vary from template to template. Deactivating. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Template talk:High-use

 – I hope moving this section here will generate more discussion and a more robust consensus for this idea from several weeks ago. A possible implementation of the proposed changes is still live in the sandbox, so interested editors can check the testcases for how it looks. —⁠andrybak (talk) 21:06, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When updating the documentation of {{citation needed}}, I realized that Template:Documentation doesn't have a link to Help:Template, which answers the question of 'what is a "template"?'. Wikilinking the word "Template" in the header "Template documentation" at the very top seems too disruptive (see Special:Diff/1231335346 and Template:Documentation/testcases#Documentation/sandbox). Template:Documentation does link to Wikipedia:Template documentation and Help:Transclusion, but at the very bottom, which is often not visible below the fold.

Newbies not familiar with templates are more likely to end up seeing documentation pages of high use templates. What if Template:High use linked to Help:Template and Wikipedia:Lua, as implemented in Special:Diff/1231332038? However, the banner text of Template:High use is aimed at implementors/editors of templates, who ought to be familiar with templates. —⁠andrybak (talk) 19:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One idea could be to add [help] alongside [view] [edit] [history] [purge] at the end. SWinxy (talk) 21:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the help would be better placed directly after [history], but otherwise agree that might be a good solution. I'm thinking that a lot of mature template editors utilize [purge] on instinct as the last option in that list, and wouldn't want that replaced. VanIsaac, GHTV ^cont_WpWS 21:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An implementation of SWinxy's idea would look something like this: main module and /config (I didn't update the corresponding code comments). With VanIsaac's suggestion: the purge link last in the list. Results are visible at Template:Documentation/testcases#Documentation/sandbox. —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that test case with "This is in line documentation." doesn't have any links at all. A [help] link there would be helpful as well. —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've implemented a hacky way of adding a [help] link to inline documentation. "Hacky", because there's already an if for "inline" vs "/doc subpage", which makes the separation of concerns between functions makeStartBoxLinksData and renderStartBoxLinks awkward. —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think a form like this ends up being pretty noisy, it's a link that gets put in with a bunch of page-specific links (so, cognitive dissonance for even the casual user), and help as the specific text doesn't make it clear how it's relevant to the specific page. Izno (talk) 17:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the criticism of the specifics, I think there's been some agreement that our "how to remove this link" additions in amboxes have not performed as expected. I don't think introing what a template is here is all that particularly helpful. Probably the modern way for someone to learn what one is is simply to google, which would probaby pop up Help:Template in short time. Izno (talk) 17:09, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with both arguments: the header is too crowded, those who want to know will find the help pages. Consider my proposal withdrawn. —⁠andrybak (talk) 19:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]