The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:16, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

• ... that Crooked Billet, a London hamlet, may have been named for a pub or a military camp and the army's "rugged staff." Source: From Wakefield to Towton: The Wars of the Roses. p. 130. ISBN 9780850528251. Matthews, Tony (6 January 2009). "Crooked Billet".
  • ALT1:... that Crooked Billet, a London hamlet, contains a garden that was a site for one of Marconi's first radio transmitters. Source:"Crooked Billet".
  • ALT2:... that Crooked Billet was the site of London's first house with electricity for illumination, boiling and ironing, and a telephone. Source: Id.

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/FDT (song)

5x expanded by 7&6=thirteen (talk). 7&6=thirteen (☎) Self-nominated at 15:40, 7 January 2019 (UTC).

Interesting, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. I am sure the deletion discussion will end "keep", but we'll have to wait for that. - Suggestions: write a bit more lead, and start the body with a bit of location and history, not the properties. I am no friend of the term "can be found" which is only for those who can actually roam around there, no? - Now what is it precisely, an area? a suburb? a district? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Expanded lead some. I decided to call it a "hamlet" which is not just a play by Shakespeare. But the sources are really nonspecific as to whether it is a "district" or "place","area" or "corner." It could be called an 'environ'. Hard to describe. Words are sometimes imprecise. I should know, as that is how I make my living. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

thanks for explaining, - there could still be more lead, but you decide. - This can appear as soon as the deletion discussion is over. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

At this point the deletion discussion is just silly. As I wrote the nominator, "Sometimes you get the bear, sometimes the bear gets you." He chose poorly. The article has developed inexorably and devastatingly. Nevertheless, he persisted. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:40, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Gerda Arendt I expanded the lead and the references. I also added a picture (which might be good if we can tie it into a hook). 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

You'd have to propose a new hook. Watching --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Article is kept! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:42, 12 January 2019 (UTC)