Who Can See It has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result November 17, 2012 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

The Beatles Low‑importance This Beatles-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. To-do list: For WikiProject The Beatles A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles. Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood. Verify : Beatle wives Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here. This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

This review is transcluded from Talk:Who Can See It/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Paul MacDermott (talk · contribs) 19:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review by Paul MacDermott

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   Article is laid out fairly well and the prose is reasonably well written. At one paragraph the lead is a little short, but it does cover the issues discussed in the main body of the text as a lead should. One small suggestion I have is that although they appear again later, you might want to attribute the quotes to the authors in the lead as well as later. I see some lyrics are quoted, which WP:LYRICS appears to suggest is fine when they're being discussed in the context of the song.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   Lots of references and inline citations throughout to verify the work. No original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   The article is broad in its coverage, discussing the major topics in relevant detail.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   No issues regarding bias. The article covers the topic in a neutral style.

5. It is stable.

   Article has one major contributor. No issues regarding edit wars or content dispute.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   No images at present. While this is not a problem for GA, it would need some images if you plan to take this forward as an FAC nomination. A couple of ideas might be an image of the record sleeve, and perhaps one of Harrison performing the song at a concert somewhere. Also you might like to consider adding an audio sample of the song for those unfamiliar with it.

7. Overall:

   Pass A good article into which a lot of work has gone. I would recommend expanding the lead, adding some images and perhaps asking for a copyedit if you want to take this to FAC at some future point, but this is fine for GA. Congratulations. Paul MacDermott (talk) 20:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, Paul MacDermott. I'll definitely take a look again at the lead-in, as you suggest. Cheers, JG66 (talk) 15:42, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]