This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Territories of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject United States TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject United States TerritoriesUnited States Territories
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Micronesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MicronesiaTemplate:WikiProject MicronesiaMicronesia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Oceania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceaniaWikipedia:WikiProject OceaniaTemplate:WikiProject OceaniaOceania
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography
Wake Island is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird
Being in the center of Pacific Ocean, this island wasn't liberated before the end of Second World War.The article doesn't tells why this island was forgotten, by american military commanders, during World War II.Why this siland wasn't liberated, before surrender of Japan?Agre22 (talk) 02:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]
Who said the island was forgotten? And MOST territory held by the empire of Japan was not liberated before surrender. The US strategy, which in the end resulted in the least number of US combatant, Japanese combatant, as well as the least number of non combatant deaths was skip over these areas and get close enough to Japan to bomb its war making capabilities. See Iwo Jima, Okinawa, or Battle of the Philippines articles here to see what happened with contested attacks on occupied areas.
The Japanese lost close ta 1,000 Japanese casualties taking the island from a couple hundred US military. The US would have lost as many or more taking it back contested. The Japanese garrison could defend it, but it could not field air craft. As long as the Jpanses could not field air craft from there, and it could not, taking it would have resulted in mass casualties on all sides for no strategic or tactical gain. Scores of other occupied islands presented the same logic.73.212.229.38 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article had a four-paragraph lead section until a few days ago. I'm not sure I understand the rationale for putting most of the lead in the new 'Summary' section. In most articles, the lead does the same work as this new summary section. What's the reason for the change? I also noticed that some of the recent changes have been removing information about the Marshall Islands' claim to Wake Island. While the U.S. has de facto control of Wake, the Marshalls' dispute over the island is well documented and shouldn't be minimised so that we ensure WP:NPOV and avoid pro-American bias in the article. CoatGuy2 (talk) 18:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, the lead is the summary section, a separate summary section is entirely redundant. On the dispute, I don't know if it needs to be as prominent as it was, but I agree removal is suboptimal. CMD (talk) 02:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Needs copyediting
I dropped the copyedit tag on the article after what I saw when correcting typos earlier. There is content that appears written without full fluency in English. I recommend a full review of the article to see where all such issues lie. Stefen Towers among the rest!Gab • Gruntwerk22:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Short suspension of military operations
Perhaps the IP editor can explain why "Military Operations on Wake Island were suspended in 2014 and the military base was left abandoned, and later restored by 2016 upon operations being resumed." is an important detail for the lead section that generally describes the subject of Wake Island. This 2-to-3-year period seems rather insignificant. Stefen Towers among the rest!Gab • Gruntwerk02:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On investigation of this, I can find nothing to that effect anywhere and is not support by the article. The only time the island was evacuated in recent times, is when a typhoon struck in 2006 (see Hurricane_Ioke) but they returned ASAP. The article says it was quite active during 2014-2016, so I suspect this was actually a vandalism or case of confusion. A75 (talk)
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
