This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Cultural Heritage of SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaCultural Heritage of Serbia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
One is about one place that happens to be the eponymous site, the other about the Vinca culture. I see no reason for a merger. Gow13:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Images
The Serbian version of this article has some good pictures that appear to be appropriately licensed. I can't navigate the Wikimedia Commons labyrinth myself, but they would be a good addition. —Joseph RoeTk•Cb, 16:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: