Varanasi has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 3, 2015 Good article nominee Listed December 26, 2018 Good article reassessment Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 29, 2015. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Kashi Vishwanath Temple in Varanasi has been destroyed and rebuilt several times and is one of the 12 Jyotirlingas Shiva temples in India?
Current status: Good article

This  level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hinduism Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Buddhism Top‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. India: Cities / Uttar Pradesh / History High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance). Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities Religion: Interfaith Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

It should be Hinduism and not Hindu Mythology. There are three instances in this article where "Hindu Mythology" has been used. These are real places and gods that lived in this world in the past and thus it's not right to call this a Myth. VM0717 (talk) 20:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. M.Bitton (talk) 00:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Google what mythology means before you comment this sort of gibberish. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 06:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"For scholars, this is very different from the vernacular usage of the term "myth" that refers to a belief that is not true. Instead, the veracity of a myth is not a defining criterion" the literal second sentence of the wikipedia page about myths/mythology. [do not change] 2406:3003:2006:2640:D3:7270:32D4:D923 (talk) 12:24, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Benares State is mentioned in multiple sources in the body article. in this section where multiple sources are cited. Therefore I think it is appreciate to mention the kingdom in the lead, as i did in this edit.

The Section:

"There were as many as 100,000 men backing the power of the Benares rajas in what later became the districts of Benares, Gorakhpur and Azamgarh. This proved a decisive advantage when the dynasty faced a rival and the nominal suzerain, the Nawab of Oudh, in the 1750s and the 1760s.

Raja Chait Singh of Benares State (r.1771–1781) An exhausting guerrilla war, waged by the Benares ruler against the Oudh camp, using his troops, forced the Nawab to withdraw his main force. The region eventually ceded by the Nawab of Oudh to the Benares State, a subordinate of the East India Company, in 1775, who recognised Benares as a family dominion.

https://archive.org/details/rulerstownsmenba0000bayl http://uqconnect.net/~zzhsoszy/ips/b/benares.html SKAG123 (talk) 19:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The particular part you added [1] in green in the following sentence − "Under the Treaty of Faizabad, the East India Company acquired the city through the Banaras kingdom in 1775" - isn't mentioned in the two accompanying sources. They only mention Benaras, nothing about the state/kingdom. The concern is about the particular sentence. Besides, what is it supposed to mean? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The last sentences of that section state that has multiple citations states that The EIC acquired the Benares kingdom form the Nawab.

The source do mention the Banaras Kingdom

Empire and Revolution: The Political Life of Edmund Burke

page 664

Chait Singh beginning in 1775 forms an important part of Burke's basic case against Hastings.245 According to Burke, this period covered an epoch in which the obligations of Benares as an independent tributary were respected in much the

Page 844

Chait Singh in Benares and agreed to relieve the Wazir of some of his burdens incurred by British pensioners, as well as some of the troops stationed in his territory. At the same time, a decision was made to continue the use of

Therefore I added “through the Banaras kingdom” since the kingdom was acquired as a subordinate based on the paragraph and sources linked above. SKAG123 (talk) 20:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see tomorrow. @Fowler&fowler: could you take a look? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A few other sources I could find also stated the same thing, although it should be noted that Raja Chait Singh of Banaras' uprisings were sparked by the Second Treaty of Banaras (1775).

https://doi.org/10.1177/23484489231198628 https://www.britannica.com/event/Treaties-of-Banaras Aditya Prakash-080 (talk) 04:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @Fylindfotberserk: I only just saw this! I had been traveling. My bell icon up top is permanently 99+! I've made a post below. Thanks. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 01:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fowler&fowler can you join in as a recent edit of yours is related to this. SKAG123 (talk) 00:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello there: Under the Treaty of Faizabad, the British acquired the Benares division from Asif uddaulah, the Nawab of Awadh; this contained the Benares District, and in turn, Benares City. These had nothing to do with the Benares Estate, a zamindari estate, under the "Maharaja of Benares". The latter, which simply paid taxes to the British, was not a princely state. It did not have a subsidiary alliance with the Company or the Raj. Here are the links from the Imperial Gazetteer of India]]: Benares Estate. In particular, Benares City, which was a part of Benares Tehsil, see same page of IGI, had nothing to do with Benares Estate. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 01:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  PS Benares Estate was a large zamindari; it had an area of 988 square miles. Pataudi State, one the other hand, with an area of only 52 square miles, was indeed a princely state. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 01:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  PS2 In other words, pages such as Vibhuti Narayan Singh which insinuate kings of Banaras, and as "Kashi Naresh," a direct link to the 2500 year old alleged Kingdom of Kashi during the Mahajanapadas, all have significant grade inflation. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 01:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I've moved Banaras State to Benares Estate per the Imperial Gazetteer of India, 1909. The article I moved seems to claim it became a full blown princely state in 1911, which I find dubious as no new princely states were created in the 20th century as far as I'm aware, especially not in the Hindi heartland.

  Someone else will need to clean it up more. A similar problem was seen in the Singrauli Estate, a red link now, which too had styled itself State, and someone changed all the Imperial Gazetteer maps on WP (many of which I had originally uploaded) so show Singrauli! Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Indeed, Benares, a princely state was created in 1911. Note spelling. It is not Banaras. The princely state did not exist at the time of the Treaty of Feyzabad, under which the Company acquired Benares District from the Nawab of Awadh. So, the phrasing in the lead does not need to be changed; in particular, Benares State, a princely state founded in 1911, would be meaningless in a 1777 treaty. Here are some sources for Benares State. The first:

  • Cohen, Saul Bernard (ed.), "Benares, former princely state", The Columbia Gazetteer of the World, A to G, Columbia University Press, p. 382, former princely state, N INDIA, created in 1911; Ramnagar town added in 1918; joined Gwalior Residency in 1936. Merged in 1949 with Benares (now VARANASi) district. Also spelled Banaras

  Fowler&fowler«Talk» 03:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The second, which is comprehensive:

  • Freitag, Sandra (1989), "Introduction", in Freitag, Sandra (ed.), Culture and Power in Banaras, University of California Press, p. 11, But in 1910—11 the British government took the unusual action of creating a new princely state of Banaras," investing the Maharaja with "full ruling powers" over the area encompassed within his zamindari." While retaining direct British rule in the city of Banaras, the British nevertheless recognized the Maharaja's cultural influence there by allowing him to retain his capital at Ramnagar (situated directly across the Ganges River, and the only other town of any size in the district). This decision to re-create the princely state was informed in part by early-twentieth-century British political concerns." The move also, however, officially recognized the ongoing politico cultural influence possessed by that triad of collaborators—the Bhumihar dynasty, the Gosains, and the merchant-bankers. In turn, it also perpetuated this influence: in its unofficial and then official role as princely state, Banaras provided important patronage for Indian artists and intellectuals, as well as opportunities for talented Indian administrators. The Maharaja's council, for instance, reflected the confluence of mercantile, landowning, caste, and educational elite possessing what we refer to here as "Hindu merchant style" culture (see below). Together the triad shaped this culture so successfully that it integrated those who resided in the city in a way that came to be virtually unparalleled in urban north India.

  If you turn the page back to page 10, you will see that the British acquired Benares from the Nawab of Awadh in 1775. The Raja of Benares, a Bhumihar large landlord, had s semi-independent status under the Nawab. In 1794 the Raja signed away his rights to the British and his lands became part of the Benares Estate. In other words, we will need two pages:

  a) Move Benares Estate to Benares (zamindari estate) for the period 1795 to 1910

  b) Create Benares (princely state) for the period 1911 to 1949.

  But we cannot have one page that incorporates both under one "ruling family." I have to go to bed now, but I'll suggest a few other things tomorrow. Meanwhile, I apologize to all here for incorrectly stating how things had stood. Again, no changes need to be made to the lead of this, i.e. Varanasi page. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 03:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  As you will see in the IGI 1909 referenced above, Benares Estate has three tehsils, Gangapur, Bhadohi and Chakia. The latter two, which are the large ones, can be seen in this map of the IGI 1931 Atlas: United Provinces.

  Gangapur is small. It is on the other side of the Ganges river from Varanasi city. It is where the palace of the Maharajas of Benares is.

  • Proviso/caveat I take back some of what I said earlier. There is a small possibility that by 1931, these tehsils had received some kind of upgrade from the Estate. To verify this one will need the Imperial Gazetteer of India, 1931. The website above has the 1931 Atlas, but not the actual gazetteer where once can check what it is called. I will look into this more.

  Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  In the mean time, may I request that no one edit war either on this page or the Benares Estate page. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The time sequence of my posts here is not linear. Apologies. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 03:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Good night! Fowler&fowler«Talk» 03:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I will clean this up tomorrow, so hold tight. Don't post here until I have rearranged my jumbled time-stamped posts. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 04:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  the source above does mention Benares as an independent tributary. Benares State also appears to be more commonly used than Benares Estate. Perhaps it is worth mentioning the state/estate? SKAG123 (talk) 01:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

• There are uncited passages in the article, some of which have had citation needed tags since February 2020.
• There is a gallery at the end of the article, which per WP:NOTGALLERY should probably be removed and the images intersperced within the article.
• There is no information about this place's history between the 1940s and the 2010s, so this article might not be complete.
• The climate data seems to stop at 2012

Is anyone willing to address these issues, or should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 20:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Haveanacc and Fowler&fowler: Regarding this edit by Fowler&fowler and its reversion by Haveanacc, please will you both explain your respective points of view on this. Other users are welcome to participate.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1 My point is, removal of voice note and description of pronunciations of Varanasi and Kashi. It was added don't know when but was easy to understand the pronunciation. Fowler&fowler came and removed unnecessary. What really led him to do? It was easy for pronunciation and understanding. official name is Varanasi and Kashi is widely used for cultural references. Haveanacc (talk) 07:42, 15 December 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki[reply]

@Haveanacc: what about the other changes in your revert - do they matter?-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:50, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1 My revert is same what it was before the edit by Fowler. I have explained above Haveanacc (talk) 07:58, 15 December 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki[reply]

We don't give the English-language pronunciation of Varanasi, which in fact might actually help the international reader, as they would most likely not normally stress the syllable -ra- instead of -na-.

Varanasi is not the ancient name of the city. It is a post-1947 name for Benares, promoted by the Hindi-language nationalists, taking as their cue the supposed Prakrit or Pali name, Baranasi, in turn based on the names of the two rivers, running into the Ganges, between which the city originally lay. Neither the two rivers nor the Ganges (Ganga) are included in the seven holy rivers of the early Rg Veda, i.e. it is not as old as the Sapta Sindhu (the name for the Indus river, and its six tributaries (Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, Sutlej, and Ghaggar-Hakra (aka Saraswati), mostly flowing through Pakistani Punjab and Sindh, which are the seven holy rivers of ancient Hinduism.

In other words, the name Varanasi is not anadi nor ananta (without beginning nor without end) Pali and Prakrit are no longer spoken in India. Despite the recent Indian declaration of Pali to be a classical language of India, it is not even a liturgical language in India, as it is in Sri Lanka. So which modern Indian language do we choose to be its true representative? I could go on, but there are too many issues with the audios. I have now footnoted all the extraneous verbiage. An interested linguist can look it up there.

I am pinging some knowledgeable administrators; they might be able to come up with a better solution, but making the lead sentence impossibly top heavy with symbols that are meaningless to an ordinary reader and .ogg files that are even more, is not the way to go in my humble opinion. @RegentsPark, Vanamonde93, and Abecedare: Fowler&fowler«Talk» 20:28, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have made two changes to the first sentence of Fowler&fowler's version to remove obvious errors.

• I deleted a ")" character, leaving the sentence with one "(" and one ")".
• This Hindi: [ʋaːˈraːɳəsi] ^ⓘ is simple and works, whereas Fowler&fowler's edit putting the .ogg file in a footnote produced a version that was complex and contained a format error that generated an error code.

I have no opinion about whether the .ogg file should be present. But if it is going to be present, that is the way to use it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can't have the ogg file as the editor who has made it has mispronounced "varanasi" in Hindi. There is an "ə" (short "a" sound) after the ņ sound. The editor has more or less pronounced it as varaṇsi. His ə is too short. This is precisely the problem with .ogg files.

Please remove it. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 00:36, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. As I said, I do not mind whether it is there or not. I just objected to it generating an error.-- Toddy1 (talk) 03:03, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1 Audio note should be there, and it was correct for all. Fowler's excuse of removal is illogical. Haveanacc (talk) 03:06, 16 December 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki[reply]

@Toddy1It was correct pronunciation in Hindi. Don't follow just one person. All the audios were correct and it was easy to understand for readers. And if not according to Fowler, then add correct one. But i oppose the removal. Problem is fowler really is dictating his own personal POV. Fowler knows nothing and pretends he knows better than anyone about India and its culture, specially Varanasi etc. Haveanacc (talk) 05:23, 16 December 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki[reply]

@Fowler&fowler Its is pronounced as Vārānasi, Banāras and Kāshī. All were correct. Stop exposing yourself deliberately please. Haveanacc (talk) 03:07, 16 December 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki[reply]

According to the .ogg file बनारस is pronounced waaransi, but according to Google translate it is pronounced banaaras. We need reliable sources.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What a mess:

• Varanasi (Q79980) on Wikidata says that the official name for the city in Hindi is बनारस
• वाराणसी on Hindi-language Wikipedia says that the common name in Hindi is वाराणसी
• Trying to find an interwikilink to Hindi-language Wikipedia on en:Varanasi defeated me (which probably means that changes are needed in Wikidata, but I do not know what those changes should be.)

वाराणसी on Google translate is pronounced differently from the .ogg file. I am not sure how reliable either are.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:36, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is precisely the problem with .ogg files. Self-styled native speakers or purists add them, but they are not helpful and make the lead sentence top heavy, distracting, if not also putting off the ordinary reader. To my ear, the pronunciation of Varanasi in the .ogg file is nowhere near the correct one. In addition, ordinary speakers, even in India, do not pronounce the retroflex ņ in Hindi unless they are being very careful, only the ordinary n.

People appear out of the blue and hold up either the lead sentence or the infobox in this inane manner. No work, no sources, and no demonstration of marshalling them in an argument, is required.

Then there is also an editor who is embarked on turning all Indic words into Sanskrit ones; so to an ordinary reader, Gandhi's name will become Mohandasa Karamchanda Gandhi. Having spent a lot of time fashioning the leads of both Varansi and Gandhi, or any of a host of other pages, ...., I have to spend even more time battling the appearance of these infobox or lead sentence demons. In my view all ogg files belong to footnotes. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 10:37, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fowler&fowler Fowler is literally propogating his personal opinions and understanding. He removed Kashi Vishwanath Temple from Vārānasi attraction images the city is especially known for. Removed the audio to demean the Varanasi. Making the sentences the way he wants to propagate to overseas readers. Looks like he owns the Wikipedia specially few particular pages. Fowler should be banned from @Wikipedia @Toddy1 Haveanacc (talk) 09:14, 18 December 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki[reply]

@Toddy1 Wikidata is official or What Indian government has ?? It's Varanasi officially. And Banāras and Kashi is old name, but widely used in India. Audio note was absolutely right. And it wasn't according to the greatest Indologist @Fowler&FowlerOnFowler&Fowler, he should add the correct one. Haveanacc (talk) 09:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki[reply]

Removal of Kashi Vishwanath Temple from images list?

The city is best known for it like Mecca, Jerusalem and Vetican City known for. All religious structures are added in their city pages.

Adding persons like Tulsidas and Bismillah khan is baseless. It's better to add another notable structure not persons. Jerusalem doesn't include Jesus, or same as Muhammad. This is stupid. Haveanacc (talk) 09:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki[reply]

@RegentsPark, Vanamonde93, and Abecedare: Please note Haveanacc (talk · contribs)'s suggestion above that I be banned from WP. The lead and the infobox pictures have been in place for several years. I note too that an IP has edit-warred over a picture of many years standing, the same one Haveanacc is attempting to defend here. The WP:ONUS is theirs. I shall restore the WP:STATUSQUO. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 11:37, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fowler&fowler Actually you know nothing and u are here to spread propoganda. You have become big user with your white supremist and anti-Hindu stances and You can do anything to me. My points still have valid point. Don't change the topic. Reply where i made valid point. and you deliberately violated the rule, you changed without discussions on Vārānasi page. Removed the audio notes. Haveanacc (talk) 11:43, 18 December 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki[reply]

I have left a comment about your post above and WP policy on your user talk page. Please read it. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

user:Haveanacc, please note MOS:LEADSENTENCE, which states, "The first sentence should introduce the topic, and tell the nonspecialist reader what or who the subject is, and often when or where." In a recent edit you have changed the lead sentence from:

is a city on the Ganges river in northern India that has a central place in the traditions of pilgrimage, death, and mourning in the Hindu world

to

is a city on the Ganges river in northern India. Considered a holy city in Hinduism, it has a central place in the traditions of pilgrimage, death, and mourning in the Hindu world.

The lead sentence now is nondescript, saying nothing distinctive about Varanasi, as MOS:LEADSENTENCE suggests. The second sentences is repetitive. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fowler&fowler Why not it's distinctive? Considered to be a holy city" should be mentioned there Stop demeaning the sacred places of Hinduism. Jerusalem is known for Christians, Mecca Madina is known for Islam, Vārānasi is known for Hinduism. You are a Christian propoganda user i know that since i have read your edits. Haveanacc (talk) 02:28, 21 December 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveforwiki[reply]