This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Magazines High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• This isn't necessarily a WP:RS but it does include info the current page is lacking and might be used to improve the article.

Is it completely impossible to find out? or was it ever explained or written down somewhere? I'm specifically looking for the authorship of the first English usage of the word myth, which appeared in Article III of the Jan 1830 issue, reviewing a book on Buddhist demon worshippers in Sri Lanka. (If you have any way of finding this out, kindly alert me at my talk page.) — LlywelynII 12:46, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]