Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Japanese / American / Animated This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. This article is supported by the Animated films task force. Anime and manga Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Animation: American / Asian / Films Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Asian animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance). Science Fiction Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Animation / Cinema Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.animationmagazine.net/2003/04/animatrix-director-andy-jones-takes-final-flight/ https://web.archive.org/web/20100802135820/https://www.cgchannel.com/2003/04/the-final-flight-of-the-osiris/

Is it worth noting on the page the large number of similarities between Kid's Story and the Perchance to Dream episode of Batman: The Animated Series? Specifically, the method of escape from the dream world is very similar -- both involve jumping off a building to commit suicide in order to wake up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.254.192.52 (talk) 06:35, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not without a secondary source saying that. Connor Behan (talk) 23:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the Animatrix in languages other than Japanese? Should the other languages be added to the infobox?

Is the Animatrix an anime? According to the Anime News Network encyclopedia, it is listed as an OAV. http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=1710 KyuuA4 10:20, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing in the body of the article to explain its inclusion in the category of Studio 4°C.

From IMDb: Studio 4°C (segments "Second Renaissance Part 1, The" "Second Renaissance Part 2, The", "Kid's Story", "Beyond" and "Detective Story") -Robixsmash (talk) 06:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The present version states that "The Animatrix is a collection of nine CG and anime shorts ...". Following the 'CG' link one learns that CG " ... was a French automobile maker"! So, what does 'CG' mean in the Animatrix context?

CG -> computer animation, problem solved, Fantasy ;-)

• Actually cg=Computer graphics, with cgi special effects being Computer-generated imagery. Seeing as how the origional wording was "CG", I've changed the link to computer graphs. However, if you think computer animation works better, I have no objections to changing it back. All three articles appear to accredit themselves with their use in films and tv shows.

Some of these were on tv as well before Reloaded came out. I think it might have been MTV, I forget. Also, the 4 films that were "originally released on the series' official website" are still available ; I'm making a small note of it. --ScarletSpiderDave 07:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The website won't allow me to download the four free preview videos of the animatrix from the website. The download and view options are there, but the download links just bring up the warner brothers website. Should that little note be removed? --Duckfootx 03:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very true, but the four free episodes are also preserved on FilePlanet in their previous high-quality resolution (640x272) in the QuickTime Movie (.mov) format. I was thinking that someone could put a link to that in the 'External Links' section of the article, or better yet, mention it in the 'Release' section as well. --Unsigned

It is unprofessional for an encyclopedia to direct content-seekers to a filesharing site. A production company giving away episodes is free to withdraw that offer at any time and that is clearly what happened when the original site went offline. I am generally not uptight about copyright and you will not see me campaign to rev-delete links to FilePlanet. But how is this in line with the manual of style? Connor Behan (talk) 23:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Connor Behan:

A production company giving away episodes is free to withdraw that offer at any time and that is clearly what happened when the original site went offline.

Them taking the site offline doesn't mean that they intended to withdraw their offer for the free download of the movie - I guess it was just too costly to keep the site up / the download available on their site. Unless they concretely state that they reverse the free-download license for their movie (also not sure to what extent that's possible?) the links should stay up. And I don't think it's unprofessional - it's very useful for readers.

--Fixuture (talk) 12:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well yes, the site going offline doesn't send a clear message about their intention. But when they made that site in ~2003 and uploaded the episodes, it is highly unlikely that they included text releasing them under a free license, even a revokable one. The DVD for instance says "copyright Warner Bros, all rights reserved". Connor Behan (talk) 00:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The individual parts of this are not notable in any way, so they belong here in the article. They are easily short enough to cut any long summaries down by a bit. TTN (talk) 20:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is just based on my observation of the film, but wasn't the conclusion of Matriculated more inclined toward the converted machine being unable to distinguish the "real" world from a virtual environment? One of the characters mentions in a brief dialog that machines cannot discern fantasy from reality, and that all environments are the same to them. In the conclusion, the converted machine is shown witnessing the brutal slaughter of his new allies in the real world, and I think it concludes that the virtual reality it was earlier exposed to is the more desirable environment, so it plugs itself and the female protagonist back in. I think she then dies as a result of her injuries, and the machine is faced with the realization that each environment is co-dependent -- when the female suffers an injury and dies in the real world, she perishes from the virtual world as well.

In the ending sequence, we see the machine sitting at the shore in place of the female protagonist. I've been trying to interpret this as best as I can, but I think this is simply indicating that the machine sympathizes with the humans' cause, and wants to convert other machines in their place. 72.150.233.141 (talk) 02:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The definition of self-substantiation given: "removing oneself from the Matrix without external aid" doesn't really seem correct. I think that self-substantiation means the ability to leave an "image" of oneself in the Matrix while having a body in the real world as well. This seems to make more sense, because it's like leaving the substance of oneself behind in the Matrix and it explains why there is a funeral at the end: there's still a body left behind.58.178.30.184 (talk) 04:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You mean letting a bidy in the Matrix and letting the mind/soul/whateva go the the body in the real world, so that the Matrix-death won't become real as usual?--85.180.9.7 (talk) 13:04, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The order of the plot summaries here is odd. It's not DVD order. It's not (according to the article) cinema order. It's almost alphabetical order, except "Final Flight of the Osiris" is near the end. Is there a particular order this was meant to be in? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.11.50 (talk) 07:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DM: Let me maybe twist the question a little bit, to look less at the audience’s side and more towards the creator’s side. We’ve talked about this before. I know that when you were working on Cowboy Bebop, it was more of a domestic product, and it ended up going abroad. When you were working on Samurai Champloo, I think you knew very early on that this was going to be a global show. Maybe you can tell me a little bit about how creating one versus the other is different.
Dai Satō: A simple explanation would be this: A director named Shinichiro Watanabe created Animatrix after Cowboy Bebop. He said Cowboy Bebop gave him many ideas for Animatrix.

http://www.japansociety.org/otaku_unmasked --Gwern (contribs) 05:10 21 January 2012 (GMT)

...itself has another meaning. It would mean "female animator" in Latin. Just a thought... --Arny (talk) 08:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The word 'animatrix' could also be a portmanteau for 'anime' and 'matrix'. --Hu753 (talk) 08:25, 30 Jan 2018 (AEST)

There is a lot of mention of "human allies" of robots, and the humans are repeatedly referred to as the "enemy human forces", almost as if the plot is written from the point of view of the machines.

<blockquote]The robots and their defected human allies retaliate by declaring war on the rest of the world, and their armies advance in all directions... with many of their inhabitants being welcomed into the robots' sanctuary to join the ever growing population of the human allies with open arms. As the machines and their human allies advance into Eastern Europe...

None of this is present in the actual Animatrix episode itself, there are no humans ever shown fighting alongside the robots, apart from the initial human supporters/sympathizers protesting and rioting after B1-66ER is destroyed. I note also that most of these sentences have citation needed tags, of which there are none. I propose for the parts referring to "human allies" to be re-written, unless anyone has any objections, or preferably some evidence. Feudonym (talk) 22:38, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Before I modified the article, it does sound like it was written by a Zero-One supporter. Those 'human allies' in Part 2 of the Second Renaissance are actually prisoners of the machines. --Hu753 (talk) 18:58, 30 Jan 2018 (AEST)

The story is told from the perspective of the machines, it might be natural for it to be told here from their perspective as it would be a direct sourcing of information. In addition, I came to the talk page to discuss the comment that the machines advanced on Eastern Europe as this doesn't appear in the film and is speculation. The machines simply advance and the focus is rather on the machine-horse that appears like one of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. Even the statement that they settled in the open desert of the Cradle of Civilization reads like an editorial as that's not stated either (the region is desert, that's all you can see). Note: I did add in the opening the direct observation that the story in this section of the film is told like the biblical Genesis creation myth as it is in fact told like a machine's version of Genesis using direct quotes and allusions to the end of each "day" in Genesis ("and it was good, for a time..."). These are direct observations from the film and I believe key to the aesthetic of the story and what, clearly, the writers were going for. (Other sections also feature information that breaks the 4th wall). JoeHenzi (talk) 08:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Animatrix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080219211621/http://archive.newyork-tokyo.com/nytff/index_flash.html to http://archive.newyork-tokyo.com/nytff/index_flash.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]