The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by a page mover) (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:02, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stenbock (family) → Stenbock – The family is clearly the primary topic. All entries on the dab Stenbock are members of the family, with the exception of Stenbock House, which is a partial title match and can be handled with a See also entry. Nick Number (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC) Nick Number (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. — Music1201 ^talk 04:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Note that this seems to be a malformed multi-page move request, or perhaps a deletion request, as the destination name is already occupied. There is no clear suggestion of what should be done with the current Stenbock dab page. Is it suggested to just delete it (since most of its entries are part of the family) or to move it? There has been no notification on the talk page of the dab page to indicate that a move or deletion of that dab page has been proposed. —BarrelProof (talk) 15:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The suggestion is to delete it, move this article to Stenbock, and add Stenbock House as a See also entry. All of the other entries on the dab are already listed here. Nick Number (talk) 16:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just placed a notice at Talk:Stenbock to inform anyone watching that page that it has been proposed to be deleted in this discussion. I suggest that the discussion here should be kept open for at least a few more days to allow for the possibility that someone might see that notice and want to come here and comment on the proposal. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom, since all people listed at Stenbock are members of that family. Two separate pages make no sense, and a see also/hatnote seems reasonable to deal with the house. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.