This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. UK geography Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do). Laplacemat (talk) 11:46, 09 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Far too much information and statistics here, all the guff about population needs removing. 146.199.238.29 (talk) 17:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@146.199.238.29 I've removed all the pointless statistics about population as it adds nothing pertinent. 87.114.59.56 (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stainton, Westmorland and Furness → Stainton (near Sedgwick) – Ambiguous with Stainton, Dacre. This article was created by me on 10 June 2010 as Stainton, Sedgwick and moved to Stainton, South Lakeland "Because there are lots of places called Sedgwick" which probably isn't a good reason as there don't appear to be any other Staintons in or even near Sedgwicks however I probably thought that Stainton with Adgarley wasn't just "Stainton" but actually it might be. It was then moved to Stainton, south Cumbria by User:Chocolateediter last year because South Lakeland was abolished and was moved to the current title today by User:Hey man im josh, see User talk:Hey man im josh#Stainton. Other than the title proposed in the RM and the title used until today there is Stainton (near Kendal) which might well be better due to being larger and the fact that A-Z uses (near Kendal) as a disambiguator in the index. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:55, 18 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:21, 27 December 2024 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stainton, Darce can be Stainton on Eamont or Stainton near Penrith.

This Stainton can be Stainton in Kendal since Kendal is actually Kirkby in Kendal.

I'd like postcodes Stainton, LA8 would be nice and short but thats a guideline change and would be wholesale conversation with many users.

It can revert the Stainton, south Cumbria; I think some user might want to move on from Cumbria after the county council was abolished but it will return as a combined authority and something something ceremonial county, etc. Chocolateediter (talk) 20:45, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're move was fine, the move the the current district wasn't due to the ambiguity. I think if there is no consensus the move made 10 days ago will get reverted. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:57, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria and WikiProject UK geography have been notified of this discussion. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Stainton (near Kendal), as per nom there are three "Stainton"s in Westmorland and Furness (the "with Adgarley" is sometimes cut-off for the other one)[1], multiple Sedgwicks (unless we go "(near Sedgwick, Cumbria/Westmorland and Furness)"?) for clarity, South Lakeland no longer exists, however Kendal (as primary) is more identifiable. Although "south Cumbria" is okay, it still exists somewhat, but if the "with Adgarley" is sometimes cut-off and also in "south Cumbria" then maybe "southeast Cumbria"? But using Kendal seems simpler. DankJae 18:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The chapel, which was "erected in 1698" is no longer used for religious reasons. Or should that read . . . for religious purposes? Ref no longer works so it's hard to determine from afar. Geopersona (talk) 13:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]