This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Architecture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This page has all the appearance of a personally created vanity page and lacks any major notable details warranting a dedicated Wiki 92.15.12.92 (talk) 15:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not create or submit this entry, although I am its subject. So it is not a 'personally created vanity page'.However I am attempting to improve it Ruariabu (talk) 18:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you you feel the title should be retained, then you should contribute to the (active and ongoing) discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roderick O'Donnell. Your comment here is unlikely to be considered as part of that discussion.

You should also read WP:COI. (You have already at least partially met one element of that guideline. Specifically: WP:DCOI).

Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 20:56, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks:I suggest you remove the 'personal vanity ' reference & stick to 'lacks any major notable details' criterion. 78.151.221.166 (talk) 21:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure who is referenced with the use of "you" there, but (a) I made absolutely no mention of "personal vanity" (and am not empowered to change the comments of others) and (b) the AfD discussion makes absolutely no mention "personal vanity" and the only "criterion" under discussion is that of notability. Guliolopez (talk) 22:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He-who-proposes deletion has 'a personally,created vanity page' As the person referred to,I did not create this entry. 78.151.221.166 (talk) 12:14, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. RE:

• "He-who-proposes deletion has 'a personally created vanity page'". I, as you can, can read that statement on this article talk page. However, just to be clear and per my previous note, THIS is not a (or the) deletion discussion page. The deletion discussion is taking place, where it should, at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roderick O'Donnell. You have not contributed to the (actual) deletion discussion. You will note that no participants in the (actual) deletion discussion have mentioned "vanity".
• "suggest you remove the 'personal vanity' reference". You've (now) repeatedly stated that you didn't create the article. That is recorded. Asking a random anonymous contributor to recant their statement (or whatever you're expecting to happen) is unlikely and unnecessary.
• "I am its subject [..signed..] Ruariabu" / "[I am] the person referred to [..signed..] 78.151.221.166". You appear to be contributing to this article talk page under multiple guises. Editors would ideally avoid editing while logged out. Or from multiple profiles. If you've created a profile, you should probably use it. Not least to (a) avoid exposing your IP address and (b) ensure that other editors (like me) can recognise whether they are in a discussion with multiple contributors. Or just one. It's confusing.

Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 22:06, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]