Friction energy is decreasing with increasing of the black hole because of increasing of the Schwarzschildradius for explanation of 10^14 sun energies and likely no impact energy coming out but annihilation energy can drive higher and higher also from black hole surfaces. A stone accelerated with c can`t escape but a rocket accelerated with photons from annihilation from infall of antimatter.

kayuweboehm(at)yahoo.de — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.221.253.38 (talk) 17:43, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

'Bold text'Quasars Quasars where first detected by radio telescopes an than observed by optical instruments. They are relatively bright an can be seen as a star-like objectin a comparatively small instrument. There spectra are unlike those of normal stars,and it was some time before it was reconigize that what was being pbserved was the nora invisible ultra-violet spectrum of a star which had been red shifted "down" into visual region. If we assume that the same red-shift distance relations that is used with galaxies can be applied to quasars, they are found to be extreamly distant, up to 8 billlion light years , in fact, an would thus be the most distance object ever observed. To look as bright as they do at this tremendus distance they would have to be hundreds of times as bright as the brightest galaxies. No physical process is know which would explain such extreme luminosity. "Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).the Telescope"Italic text ive witinessed a white light event / situation, that made me start to think about; whereas.... reread material over again. Both the tremendous distance an the incomprehesiable brightness ascribed to the quasars depend on the unverified assumption that they fit the same red-shift distance relation that is used four galaxies. Lacuna in brightness and changes in their apparent scintilla size have been observed which would seem to be completely impossiable if their distances are actually billoions of light years; anthropomorphic. thank you for reading this i hope bona fida

                                                        §§(David davidth Mr Espinoza (talk) 08:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC))§§David davidth Mr Espinoza (talk) 08:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Quasar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081217134733/http://www.galaxydynamics.org/papers/GreatMilkyWayAndromedaCollision.pdf to http://www.galaxydynamics.org/papers/GreatMilkyWayAndromedaCollision.pdf
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100202184123/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu:80/~tcox/localgroup/lg.pdf to http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~tcox/localgroup/lg.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)