This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation Start‑class This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. This article was accepted from this draft on 24 February 2020 by reviewer Bkissin (talk · contribs). Film: Indian This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force. India: Andhra Pradesh / Telangana / Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Telangana (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup.

If you want to add a release date talk about it on the talk page since it has not been announced yet--SP013 (talk) 23:58, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This news is not confirmed by the production house so do not change the cast as that is WP:CRYSTALBALL --SP013 (talk) 23:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ab207 It would be significant enough to move the page from Pushpa to Pushpa: The Rise because it is obviously being made in two parts. SP013 (talk) 22:01, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SP013 Sorry for the late reply. Yeah, I agree that the page should be moved to Pushpa: The Rise. Second part's page can be created in future. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:37, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please add this information in legal issue section: A men's association has filed a case against the song which was released recently in Tamil and Telugu as "Oo Solriya" and "Oo Antava" for portraying men as 'lustful' throughout its lyrics and visuals. Source Rizosome (talk) 05:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to describe about Hindi dubbing artist

43.245.93.151 (talk) 12:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Total box office collection =229 crore 2405:204:A68C:3ACA:E8B1:6A15:4EB1:247F (talk) 17:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - as you have not cited reliable sources to support your request, without which nothing should be added to or changed in a Wikipedia article}} - Arjayay (talk) 18:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is very wrong to give less screen to the film in the North inspite of not very good response by Hindi North Public, Makers should provide more screen so that there is good business! And Also The Good Reach of Allu Arjun Sir !! And Fahad Fassil Sir To The North !! 2409:4052:211D:58B4:CDB6:3E05:8307:A10C (talk) 13:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

reply - what are we supposed to about it.? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.244.139.149 (talk) 04:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The collection has not exceeded 260 Crores yet the page says 300Crores. There’s also no reliable sources to say it has earned 300Crores. Stop these false claims. 2406:B400:A9:A601:FC3C:11ED:2DDD:EEC4 (talk) 14:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Removed unsourced figures. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:13, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pushpa collection - 320 crores. Change it soon. 117.205.175.121 (talk) 05:54, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done No sources given to change the BO collection. SP013 (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

pushpa box office collectin 350 crores 2409:4042:4D4D:9C77:667A:9B17:635D:CC5E (talk) 04:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pushpa is a cookie (which is correct) But,he doesn't volunteer,he works for money.. 46.175.252.26 (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Changed the wording. -- Ab207 (talk) 05:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Highest gross indian film Minnalverali (talk) 12:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why lead say,' it was commercially successful', "was" word indicating like this film was released way back but it's not true it is still running in Maharashtra's theaters. I suggest to change this line into present tence.Success think (talk) 13:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is ok to make, Impact section in this article ? Due to mammoth Hindi version success the Goldmine telefilms decided to release hindi, Ala Vaikunthapuramalu in theater at 26 Jan 2022. I wnat your openion, if not got it I'll make one as WP : SILENT, SOURCE - ^[1] Success think (talk) 18:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success think, the film itself is a reliable source for the second part title which is shown at the end. SP013 can also confirm this. -- Ab207 (talk) 10:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the film say so, provide link so anyone can verify, User: SP013 not provided any ref. We need clear ref, so anyone can cross check it. Do not add WP: Original research. Success think (talk) 11:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The first part is stylised as, "Pushpa : The Rise Part - 01", use can see on poster, so the possibility is they will keep this style and will write it as, "Pushpa : The Rule - Part 02". I also suggest to change this article's name & write the way it written on Poster. Success think (talk) 11:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success Think The second film’s title was already announced at the end of the first part as Pushpa 2: The Rule I do not understand what the problem here is when it’s clearly in the film itself it does not require a source alongside of it to prove that it is correct. SP013 (talk) 13:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success think, that's clear misinterpretation of original research is. If I contact the movie production team to know ask what the title is, that's OR. But we are using what is already displayed in the film. Here is the citation,^[1] which can be added if you insist. On the other hand, trying to predict what the second part title is based on first part should be avoided per WP:CRYSTAL. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ab207: I don't have Amazon prime video subscription, so bro I can't cross check it & I think most folks don't have one but let the join 3-4 more editors here, let's here what they say, if mejority voted for your view then anyone can change, like a democratic way. I hope other editors 'll join this discussion. Success think (talk) 14:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ab207 (talk · contribs) I tried to add some critical views of reviewer's here but someone erased them. Fans don't want critical things here, which pointing out flaws? Success think (talk) 15:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success think, please see WP:PAYWALL. Both SP013 and I have have access and can confirm this. Also, Wikipedia is not a democracy for a "majority" to agree.

About the reviews, the focus should be on the original Telugu version. Adding 1 or 2 two reviews from the dubbed version "may be" okay to get a perspective but they should be limited. For example, a reviewer criticizing the Hindi dub songs is totally irrelevant to the film. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success think There is no majority to be considered when it is clearly evident in this screenshot from the end of the film [1] that the second film’s name is Pushpa 2: The Rule. SP013 (talk) 15:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you can post the screenshot, can you? (Surely, that's not on WP, but I'm not sure if you can link to them from WP.) Isn't that against copyright policies? — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 15:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could be. The link can be removed once our fellow editor is satisfied with it. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know WP: consensus, read it. WP says it discuss with fellow editors & come on a consensus point. Can you provided a news source for your claim. I'm not sure but I don't think usually add citations from OTT platforms. For me it's over, do what you think right. Success think (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success think The film itself counts as a primary source for the article if you want to check use this under Wikipedia Policies (Wikipedia:Verifiability). Under this it counts as a reliable source since its the work itself. SP013 (talk) 16:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just sayin provide WP: Reliable source. Prime video is a subscription based app. Everyone don't have it's access. But without providing you wanting do change by your research, I know you watched the film on Prime video you know the 2nd film's title but isn't it WP: Original research. Just provide 1 reliable source, otherwise don't do anything. Success think (talk) 15:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success think, as I said, please see WP:PAYWALL, you cannot reject a source just because its not accessible by you. Also, the film is the best-possible reliable source for the second part title, we don't need newspapers to tell that. This is not original research in any way. Anyway, here is a source confirming the same. Ironically, you who have not provided any reliable source to support your claim. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you can edit now, if you think this source is reliable. Success think (talk) 16:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from User talk:Ab207

 – Ab207 (talk) 17:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But is there any downside, if u mentioned the screenplay writer name. Ref sayin that he's one. Success think (talk) 12:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success think, I'm aware that but writer includes both story and screenplay, need not mention separately. You should probably bring content-related stuff at the article talk, so that other editors can also take a look. -- Ab207 (talk) 13:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You know screenplay also very important aspect of film making and we have to mention it. Look at the reception section many reviewer mention about Sukumar's screenplay. Success think (talk) 16:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success think, that's what written by means. Tenet is written by Christopher Nolan, not Story-Screenplay by Christopher Nolan. We mention it seperately only when story and screenplay credit is divided per Template:Infobox film. Here, Sukumar has both the credits, so its just "written by." -- Ab207 (talk) 17:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will you contribute Goldmines Telefilms Pvt Ltd. Success think (talk) 18:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ab207: You should do not have to remove tags without solving the mentioned problem. If any source don't say the organisation title who field law suite, then the news do have to be on WP.Success think (talk) 14:01, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success think, are you serious? No source has mentioned the organization name, so we are not compelled to add it unless its reported. Also in this edit, mentioning that they removed the scene on fans demand is enough. "Small strife has aroused online" part is not even mentioned in the source. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source says that you read before. Readers have right to know whole story, if the tag is there someone will reserch & add it. There is know need to remove tags, just u don't found sources for that. Possibly some Telugu physical newspaper had reported the org title. Some organization field a law suit - these type of "some" is known as 'Wisely' words on WP. Success think (talk) 16:13, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ab207: Are you want to hide that thing ? Success think (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Success think: Please indent your replies properly. You cannot expect it to be fixed by others everytime. No newspaper has reported the orginazation, even in Telugu. So its futile to tag it. You can restore the tag if you still believe it can be sourced. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Pushpa The Rise Part 01 theatrical poster.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir it's buffet is 120(118) crore of part Pushpa the rise confirm by producer Not 200-250 it's 120 crore 43.230.107.137 (talk) 06:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - I assume you meant budget, not buffet, but you have not provided a reliable independent source - I'm not commenting on whether the producer is reliable, or not - but he is clearly not independent - Arjayay (talk) 11:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change the name "Pushpa Raj" to "Pushparaj". This is important to the plot. Ready1034 (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: Inaccurate; Pushpa and Raj are clearly two distinct words. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:29, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are many reliable sources which mentioned the budget to be ₹200 crore. Only one source mentioned it as ₹170 crore (Samayam Telugu). 2 sources have published the value ₹250 crore. @Khiladi King (talk) Khiladi King (talk) 12:55, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]