Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 07:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: BigChrisKenney (talk · contribs) 02:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well met, @Chiswick Chap: I will be reviewing this as part of the January backlog elimination drive.

I made an edit you should review.

OK.

Good!

Good! (Added a comma.)

Good!

Good!

Good! (Added a comma.)

Good!

Good!

Good!

Good!

Good!

All Good!

This image used is acceptable.

The article is image sparse. I looked for anythat I could use and found: The Green Fairy Book-0013.jpg, and puictures of the Univerisity of St. Andrews. These might help to beautify the article if you so choose.

We can't use images just for decoration, but since we mention Lang's Fairy Books I've added an illustration from one of them to accompany the text.

Overall, with the exception of the Intro, not much needs to be amended! BigChrisKenney (talk) 02:48, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (references):

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   c (OR):

   d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):

   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall: Pass/Fail:

Not much needed to be done. Thanks again for another GA! BigChrisKenney (talk) 08:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]