Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: IJReid (talk · contribs) 05:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well take on this review, since this is the oldest species article nominated. From a quick glance the article looks good, although I do hate it when images cause section headers to shift, but I'm not sure if that's even a significant point to raise. Points will come soon. IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 05:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Skipping to taxonomy because I like doing the lead last, there are a few odd quirks I think merrit mention. IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 05:18, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• "short lived" and "short-lived" are odd ways to describe a taxonomic placement, rewording might fix this
• I don't know the significance of Verhandlungen der Zoologisch, link if possible, or otherwise mention why it is important
• If it may be split, perhaps mention how it would be if there is literature on that
• "I. itoi was described as a separate species, while I. itoi abbotti was recognised as a subspecies" this wording is odd, perhaps something similar to "I. itoi was described as a separate species, which includes the later-named I. itoi abbotti as a subspecies" (assuming the subspecies was named later)
• "and in the 1950s I. itoi was first noted to be similar to O. glaber" maybe move this statement to the beginning of the next sentence
• "It is commonly known as" perhaps mention the full name here just for simplicities sake
• You should know I love phylogenies, but there is no mention of any relatives anywhere in the article I can find. Cladograms can be requested here if you find any.

Commencing work today. Sorry for keeping this late. Burklemore1 (talk) 22:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Burklemore1 and IJReid: Hello! What is the status of this review? Doesn't look like any progress has been made in over a month.--Dom497 (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I lost this one because of lack of action. I will close it unless something happens within the span of a week (5 days). IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 04:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closing review now. No progress IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 00:02, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]