This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lepidoptera High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wondering if we need a sub page for the Fritillary butterflies. There seem to be a lot of these with entries but only a few linked from here. I don't know enough taxomony to place all of these correctly. --Salix alba (talk) 11:29, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea to me --Dematt 20:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Notable species" seems a sly way of introducing a list of (random? popular? wikified?) butterfly species. All plant and animal species are notable, and all have been granted the possibility of having their own article in WP. What might be a better title to this section?--Wloveral (talk) 21:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right - it just appears to be a small sample of a number of well known (to the general public that is) species. Would probably be better if the subheadding was changed to something else, as I do see a use of this list to "normal people" (yes, bad wording, but you know what I mean). I have changed it to "example species from this family" instead, but someone could probably come up with something better. 212.10.66.79 (talk) 03:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nymphalidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025220449/http://nymphalidae.utu.fi/Wahlbergetal2003b.pdf to http://nymphalidae.utu.fi/Wahlbergetal2003b.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]