New York State Route 342 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result November 11, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  U.S. state highways   Locations  New York   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 342/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

• In the west, NY 342 begins at an intersection with NY 12 in Pamelia, just a few miles north of Watertown. - "A few miles" needs a rough conversion.
• An intersection with US 11 is not far off, and NY 342 subsequently passes the Fort Drum Military Reservation. - Find better wording for "is not far off", which is rather informal.
• Planning for the highway started in 2002 and 2003, with the plans to reconstruct starting and ending in 2013 and 2014. - Needs to be worded better; as it is it's slightly confusing.
• The cost with the planned project would be $6.4 million - Change "with" to "of"

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

On hold for now. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 17:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All comments are resolved.Mitch32^(UP) 20:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]