This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chiropractic Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Chiropractic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chiropractic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChiropracticWikipedia:WikiProject ChiropracticTemplate:WikiProject ChiropracticChiropractic Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative medicine This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine Skepticism Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I can't believe that this whole article is left to stand without challenge. The whole are of chiropractic/homeopathic is not science and should be left in the dark ages.WriterJMD (talk) 15:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nmtcenter.com/history/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to redirect this article to Soft tissue therapy. There is practically nothing here and its covered under that and Manual therapy. Votes? Thoughts? Rap Chart Mike (talk) 19:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Change of proposal, sort of. Turns out that Soft tissue therapy was put up for deletion and the discussion resulted in a decision to merge with Manual therapy. So might as well redirect to the page it's merging with instead if a redirect is decided on.Rap Chart Mike (talk) 19:52, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]