Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Milky Way

Former good articleMilky Way was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 18, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 14, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 9, 2013Good article nomineeListed
January 4, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Semi-protected edit request on 18 September 2024

hihi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Froggyqwertyui (talk • contribs) 04:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. hamster717🐉(discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠) 15:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2024 (2)

Sorry, the spelling error is in reference 21, not 22. Change "Lausten" into "Laustsen". I could not figure out how to edit my previous request. AstroOgier (talk) 12:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done M.Bitton (talk) 12:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 November 2024

The idea that the bright sky in summer "can obscure" the Milky Way in Scandinavia and Northern Europe is funny. The sky does not become dark at all in the summer months, and Milky Way (like almost all stars in the night sky) is not visible in summer. 88.148.150.166 (talk) 17:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 December 2024

Attach hyperlinks for “voids” and “super clusters” to their respective articles Baschaa (talk) 19:22, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I added a link to Void (astronomy) and there is already a link to supercluster. cyberdog958Talk 11:46, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: No major edits to the article since posted at GAR, no one has indicated that they want to make the necessary improvements Z1720 (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are some citation needed tags, unreliable source? tags in the article, The "Appearance" has had an orange "additional sources needed" banner and the "Satellite observations" has had an orange "update needed" banner. Real4jyy (talk) 03:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.