Melbourne Airport has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 31, 2008 Good article nominee Listed August 7, 2008 Peer review Reviewed October 4, 2008 Featured article candidate Not promoted July 15, 2009 Peer review Reviewed Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Airports This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation This article is supported by the airport project. This article has failed an A-Class review. Australia: Melbourne / Transport Mid‑importance Melbourne Airport is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Top-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Top-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Melbourne Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080724033809/http://www.melbourneairport.com.au/downloads/pdfs/APACAnnualReport1999.pdf to http://www.melbourneairport.com.au/downloads/pdfs/APACAnnualReport1999.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090325112840/http://www.melbourneairport.com.au/downloads/pdfs/MelbourneAirport_MasterPlan2008.pdf to http://www.melbourneairport.com.au/downloads/pdfs/MelbourneAirport_MasterPlan2008.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The original "Melbourne Airport" was Essendon Airport (now MEB). The new airport was Tullamarine Airport (Now MEL). Was Tullamarine always MEL? Or did it change?, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.188.146.143 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t touch the talk page’s archives or place an auto-archive template at this moment as I’m currently waiting for assistance at the WP:Help desk on how to fix the mess that was created by an old manual archive. I will reply to this post once auto-archiving has been set up again. Fork99 (talk) 05:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All done. Fork99 (talk) 10:31, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) It's fixed now. I have deleted Talk:Melbourne Airport/Archive 2 since you copied the content to Talk:Melbourne Airport/Archive 1. The manual archiving was valid. The problem was to set up auto-archiving with counter = 1 instead of counter = 2 when there were 2 archives at the time. There is only 1 now so counter = 1 has become valid and I have restored auto-archiving. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:

• The article has uncited text, including entire paragraphs.
• The "History" section does not give much post-2006 information, with no information about the airport's operations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Is anyone interested in addressing the above concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result pending

This article has several uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. The "History" section does not give much information after 2006, which is surprising considering that many airports were affected by COVID-19 lockdowns. Z1720 (talk) 17:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]