This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
We need to obtain the nomination docs on this... I am not sure that the listed architect is correct. Also, The NRIS lists this building as being in the "Prairie style"... looking at google street view I question that (I could be wrong... but we do need to check) Blueboar (talk) 14:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for at least opening a discussion section. I came here to comment about the arrogant-seeming, crazy editing by you to delete material in the article, apparently based on a hunch by you that the architect info is wrong. It is sourced info. I added a bit. You're reasoning, essentially that you look at Google and you personally have little knowledge about architecture and/or this site, so you edit wikipedia, is poor, IMHO. --doncram