Madonna: Like an Icon has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 15, 2012 Good article nominee Not listed November 28, 2014 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 2, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that author Lucy O'Brien was criticized for giving too much emphasis to singer Madonna's discography in the biography Madonna: Like an Icon?
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Madonna Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Madonna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Madonna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MadonnaWikipedia:WikiProject MadonnaTemplate:WikiProject MadonnaMadonna Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Just to keep a record of the work that has been done here as part of User talk:Legolas2186/Fixing citation problems, I removed an unverified Christina Jansen cite, one that several editors could not find in the supposed source. I also removed a great swath of text (and quotes!) that had only the unverified citation to support it. I found the problem during GA1 review and it looked quite serious to me, violating WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:RS, MSU (making shit up), etc. This apparently false Jansen citation was the catalyst for me taking a look through Legolas2186's other article work. Binksternet (talk) 23:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]