This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Socialism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This is a bizarre biography, excluding the most active years of Fraina's political life, between 1913 and 1945. I don't know how to mark this fact out in using one of the symbolic boxes relating to status of articles, but if someone would do it that would be a good thing. Chris Lowe (talk) 16:14, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, wasn't he active in Mexico in the 1920s/1930s?--Radh (talk) 09:13, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm finally trying to get this thing up to snuff. Criticisms were appropriate and are now moot. Carrite (talk) 20:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A quick word to note that I am Tim Davenport and have put my own words into play as one footnote, dealing with the history of The New Review. It's minor and uncontroversial matter and not really even worth mentioning, but I will. Carrite (talk) 20:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]