This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Theatre Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Freedom of speech This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I'm going to suggest that the quotation from Lord Chamberlain's office is far to long for an encyclopedia article. Could you summarize the main points?. Also, try using a quotation template as a means of preserving the formatting of the original letter. -Dhodges (talk) 17:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I like to say, the LCO may be important to Lady Chatterley's Lover, but Lady Chatterley's Lover is not important to LCO. I've moved it to Lady Chatterley's Lover--Tysto (talk) 19:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]