This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance). Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. U.S. Streets Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Streets, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of streets in the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. StreetsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. StreetsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. StreetsU.S. city street Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• Film footage of 1917 Portola Drive User:Exit2DOS2000 23:08, September 3, 2011

Why only major thoroughfares, when we have so many articles on other streets? I say we add all streets with articles to this list.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:42, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, great idea. think ill do that.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:09, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do any of you Wikipedians honestly think that any published source out there would contain a simple list of city streets like this one? I don't think so. Because of this, tagging this article with {{unreferenced}} isn't going to get this article anywhere, and it just acts as clutter. Tag has been removed. Of course, if anyone happens to find any sources out there, go ahead and cite them, but I'm doubtful. 166.197.181.73 (talk) 02:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly you guys don't check this talk page, because after posting the above comment, I identified the lone bare URL located in the article. However, upon source completion, the article was tagged with {{refimprove}}. I already said that I didn't think any published sources would contain a simple list like this, and I meant it. Please stop cluttering the article with tags. Thank you. 107.225.145.212 (talk) 02:06, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]