This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
The article on Lily Phillips is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Well, that's... honestly, it sounds like a miserable time for all involved. Article is new enough, long enough. Hook facts are interesting. I'm not keen on ALT1, even as an April Fool's hook, because blending the girl next door archetype with an actual person feels like it's going too far. Earwig shows 44.1%, but those appear to all be correctly attributed quotes and titles. No image to check. Article is mostly neutral, though some of the opinions could be better described as such (Gold noting that Phillips was "not very bright and will soon not be very well" - that's not objective fact, but rather an inference drawn from one video). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of the reviews for this descended into outright nastiness; I only included her and Bindel's quotes because Lewis mentioned them in her piece. I've changed both the "noting"s in that sentence.--Launchballer00:51, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's... honestly, it sounds like a miserable time for all involved. Article is new enough, long enough. Hook facts are interesting. I'm not keen on ALT1, even as an April Fool's hook, because blending the girl next door archetype with an actual person feels like it's going too far. Earwig shows 44.1%, but those appear to all be correctly attributed quotes and titles. No image to check. Article is mostly neutral, though some of the opinions could be better described as such (Gold noting that Phillips was "not very bright and will soon not be very well" - that's not objective fact, but rather an inference drawn from one video). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)