This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Doctor Who Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force. BBC Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary) Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments) Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles Other : *Restructure the category Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments) Reassess BBC following improvements to article. Yorkshire Low‑importance Legend of the Sea Devils is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nadia Albina reprises her role as Diane, briefly, in the episode but is uncredited for it. Does that mean we can't include it in the infobox and if we can, does it need a note to say it was uncredited? Panda815 (talk) 07:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would have no issue including her at the end of the list, much like how uncredited cast have been included at "The Unicorn and the Wasp", "Vincent and the Doctor", or "The Day of the Doctor", to name a few episodes. -- Alex_21 _TALK 07:16, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

She’d still go in the cast list in the prose for sure CreecregofLife (talk) 07:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add it for now. Feel free to RV if this is contested in any way. Panda815 (talk) 08:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know it’s not pretty and I’m not trying to be mean, but this is the lowest rated episode in the revival series, shouldn’t it be mentioned? (204.126.3.183 (talk) 04:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Certainly, if you have a source that explicitly states so. -- Alex_21 _TALK 04:37, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"...On Rotten Tomatoes, a review aggregator website, 50% of seven critics gave "Legend of the Sea Devils" a positive review"

This is just embarrassing. That is a bad review, but skimming this section only has positive words. This is clearly, or identical to, an attempt by someone paid to make the series look good. CrickedBack (talk) 07:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CrickedBack WP:SOFIXIT. -- Alex_21 _TALK 08:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]