This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Mid-importance).

The section "future plans" entirely referred to the reverible lanes, which are part of the Homer M. Hadley Memorial Bridge. Therefore I transferred that section to the other article (and modified what was necessary to do so). --Matthiasb-DE (talk) 09:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Washington State Department of Transportation, the floating portion of the bridge, is 7,869 feet that makes it either the longest floating bridge in the world. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR104HoodCanalBridgeEast/numbers.htm

The Evergreen Point Bridge (SR520) is 7,578 feet (2,310 meters)

The I-90 (Lacey Murrow) floating bridge is 6,620 ft (2,020 meters)

70.90.187.22 (talk) 04:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)TheWizardOfAhhs wizard@wizardnco.com[reply]

Do you care to have a go at fixing it? You can find out how to add footnotes at WP:FN. Thank you, Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article lacks almost totally of information on technical data, e.g. length of spans, width, etc. as well as details on the construction itself. --Matthiasb (talk) 08:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the old 1940s bridge span that sunk, is it still at the bottom of the lake or did it get pulled back up and dismantled? LukasMaps (talk) 02:52, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@LukasMaps: The pontoons that sank still remain at the bottom of the lake, but a few were auctioned off for other uses (this one being a breakwater in Craig, Alaska). SounderBruce 05:34, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article lacks any information about why engineers needed to use the floating bridge design. (It has to do with extreme depth of Lake Washington.). That’s why I came here. Ian.gold (talk) 22:17, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]