This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Armenia Karbelian is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Karbelian → Gabelian – name misspelled. The correct name is Gabelian, used wrongly as the name for the district ruled by this family. Renato de Carvalho Ferreira (talk) 16:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Feeglgeef (talk) 20:12, 12 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Feeglgeef (talk) 21:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A good ref (or two) showing that they refer to the same place would make your argument more effective. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824 (talk · contribs), as far as I know, there is no family (this is not a place name) called Karbelian (see here). The family was called Gabelian (or Gabełean = Գաբեղեան) and the article is about them (some mentions here). For precise citation, see Toumanoff (1963), p. 220-221, 240, 252 etc. (cf. pt:Família Gabeliano). The district the Gabelians ruled was called Gabełeank (the family name + suffix k' to indicate place names).--Renato de Carvalho Ferreira (talk) 14:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should the articles be merged? There's basically nothing in either article and the district article also seems to be about the family by its one sentence. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 13:17, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Low participation Feeglgeef (talk) 21:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skarmory, trying not to be rude, these articles are all IP trash. They were made in 2005 or so and never were edited so far, at least not to include new content. I'm creating and expanding all articles on pt.wiki, but I just do minimal improvements here. If anyone understands Portuguese, it's a good start. All sources are there for this family and almost all others.--Renato de Carvalho Ferreira (talk) 23:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And the reason this isn't a CSD#A7? TiggerJay (talk) 04:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would at least turn this into a redirect to Gabełeank (or the other way around) rather than delete. I don't think it falls under any of the A7 categories anyway, and the ptwiki article seems to have a claim to significance, so I think it just needs expansion rather than deletion. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 22:37, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]